Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2017

01-12-2017 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Unnecessary preoperative biliary drainage: impact on perioperative outcomes of resectable periampullary tumors

Authors: Jean-Baptiste Cazauran, Julie Perinel, Vahan Kepenekian, Michel El Bechwaty, Gennaro Nappo, Mathieu Pioche, Thierry Ponchon, Mustapha Adham

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Routine preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (PEBD) is not recommended for malignant periampullary tumors (MPT) with uncomplicated obstructive cholestasis, yet many patients still receive routine PEBD. Herein were assessed perioperative outcomes of routine PEBD in resectable MPT with uncomplicated biliary obstruction.

Methods

From 2008 to 2014, we identified three groups among patients undergoing surgery for resectable MPT: “unnecessary-PEBD” (despite recommendations), “necessary-PEBD” (following recommendations), and “upfront-surgery groups.” The first two groups were compared on referral patterns, drainage procedure, and post-PEBD complications; “Unnecessary-PEBD” and “upfront-surgery” groups were compared on perioperative outcomes.

Results

A total 140 patients underwent surgery for resectable MPT; 38 had cholestasis with clear PEBD indication (“necessary-PEBD”). A further 66 presented uncomplicated obstructive cholestasis with total bilirubin < 300 μmol/l, of whom 26 had unnecessary PEBD and 40 underwent upfront surgery. In total, 40.1% of PEBD were unnecessary and 64.1% were performed before surgical consultation. Time-to-surgery was significantly increased in the “unnecessary-PEBD” group by a mean ± SD 35.3 ± 5.5 days as compared to “upfront-surgery” group (95%CI [24.4–46.2]; p < 0.001). The “unnecessary-PEBD” group had a post-PEBD complication rate of 34.6%, and 7.7% were unresectable due to severe fibrosis following PEBD-induced acute pancreatitis. Perioperative severe complication rate was higher in the “unnecessary-PEBD” (73.1%) than in the “upfront-surgery” group (37.5%, p = 0.005), as was Clavien-Dindo grade > II post-operative complication rate (65.4 and 37.5%; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

Routine preoperative biliary drainage is associated with an increased morbidity and persists despite recommendations against its systematic use. Early multidisciplinary team discussions with pancreatic surgeons should be implemented with an aim to reduce unnecessary stenting and improve patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blamey SL, Fearon KCH, Gilmour WH, Osborne DH, Carter DC (1983) Prediction of risk in biliary surgery. Br J Surg 70(9):535–538CrossRefPubMed Blamey SL, Fearon KCH, Gilmour WH, Osborne DH, Carter DC (1983) Prediction of risk in biliary surgery. Br J Surg 70(9):535–538CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Armstrong CP, Dixon JM, Taylor TV, Davies GC (1984) Surgical experience of deeply jaundiced patients with bile duct obstruction. Br J Surg 71(3):234–238CrossRefPubMed Armstrong CP, Dixon JM, Taylor TV, Davies GC (1984) Surgical experience of deeply jaundiced patients with bile duct obstruction. Br J Surg 71(3):234–238CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, Davidson BR, Lin H, Xie X et al (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice: safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg 100(12):1589–1596CrossRefPubMed Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q, Davidson BR, Lin H, Xie X et al (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice: safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg 100(12):1589–1596CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60(5):721–731CrossRefPubMed Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60(5):721–731CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T et al (2012) Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 75(3):467–473CrossRefPubMed Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T et al (2012) Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 75(3):467–473CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Silviera ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, Prosciak MP, Doraiswamy VA, Wang CF et al (2009) Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 18(1):73–82PubMed Silviera ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, Prosciak MP, Doraiswamy VA, Wang CF et al (2009) Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 18(1):73–82PubMed
7.
go back to reference Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ et al (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54(4):425–434CrossRefPubMed Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ et al (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54(4):425–434CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jeurnink SM, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, Dees J, Poley JW, Haringsma J et al (2011) Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognostic model for early discharge. Surg Endosc 25(9):2892–2900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeurnink SM, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, Dees J, Poley JW, Haringsma J et al (2011) Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognostic model for early discharge. Surg Endosc 25(9):2892–2900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Saleh MMA, Nørregaard P, Jørgensen HL, Andersen PK, Matzen P (2002) Preoperative endoscopic stent placement before pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on morbidity and mortality. Gastrointest Endosc 56(4):529–534CrossRefPubMed Saleh MMA, Nørregaard P, Jørgensen HL, Andersen PK, Matzen P (2002) Preoperative endoscopic stent placement before pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on morbidity and mortality. Gastrointest Endosc 56(4):529–534CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH, Rauws EJ, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2002) A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg 236(1):17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH, Rauws EJ, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2002) A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg 236(1):17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, Bruno MJ, van der Harst E, Kubben FJ et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362(2):129–137CrossRefPubMed van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, Bruno MJ, van der Harst E, Kubben FJ et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362(2):129–137CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Scheufele F, Schorn S, Demir IE, Sargut M, Tieftrunk E, Calavrezos L et al (2017) Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: a meta-analysis of current literature. Surgery 161(4):939–950 Scheufele F, Schorn S, Demir IE, Sargut M, Tieftrunk E, Calavrezos L et al (2017) Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: a meta-analysis of current literature. Surgery 161(4):939–950
15.
go back to reference Jinkins LJ, Parmar AD, Han Y, Duncan CB, Sheffield KM, Brown KM et al (2013) Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgery 154(2):179–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jinkins LJ, Parmar AD, Han Y, Duncan CB, Sheffield KM, Brown KM et al (2013) Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgery 154(2):179–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mansfield SD, Sen G, Oppong K, Jacques BC, O’Suilleabhain CB, Manas DM et al (2006) Increase in serum bilirubin levels in obstructive jaundice secondary to pancreatic and periampullary malignancy—implications for timing of resectional surgery and use of biliary drainage. HPB 8(6):442–445CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mansfield SD, Sen G, Oppong K, Jacques BC, O’Suilleabhain CB, Manas DM et al (2006) Increase in serum bilirubin levels in obstructive jaundice secondary to pancreatic and periampullary malignancy—implications for timing of resectional surgery and use of biliary drainage. HPB 8(6):442–445CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kloek JJ, Heger M, van der Gaag NA, Beuers U, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ et al (2010) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on coagulation and fibrinolysis in severe obstructive cholestasis. J Clin Gastroenterol 44(9):646–652CrossRefPubMed Kloek JJ, Heger M, van der Gaag NA, Beuers U, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ et al (2010) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on coagulation and fibrinolysis in severe obstructive cholestasis. J Clin Gastroenterol 44(9):646–652CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dixon JM, Armstrong CP, Duffy SW, Davies GC (1983) Factors affecting morbidity and mortality after surgery for obstructive jaundice: a review of 373 patients. Gut 24(9):845–852CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dixon JM, Armstrong CP, Duffy SW, Davies GC (1983) Factors affecting morbidity and mortality after surgery for obstructive jaundice: a review of 373 patients. Gut 24(9):845–852CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Lai ECH, Lau SHY, Lau WY (2014) The current status of preoperative biliary drainage for patients who receive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: a comprehensive review. Surgeon 12(5):290–296CrossRefPubMed Lai ECH, Lau SHY, Lau WY (2014) The current status of preoperative biliary drainage for patients who receive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: a comprehensive review. Surgeon 12(5):290–296CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Singhirunnusorn J, Roger L, Chopin-Laly X, Lepilliez V, Ponchon T, Adham M (2013) Value of preoperative biliary drainage in a consecutive series of resectable periampullary lesions: from randomized studies to real medical practice. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 398(2):295–302CrossRef Singhirunnusorn J, Roger L, Chopin-Laly X, Lepilliez V, Ponchon T, Adham M (2013) Value of preoperative biliary drainage in a consecutive series of resectable periampullary lesions: from randomized studies to real medical practice. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 398(2):295–302CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tempero M, Arnoletti JP, Ben-Josef E, Bhargava P, Casper ES, Kim P et al (2007) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN 5(10):998–1033CrossRefPubMed Tempero M, Arnoletti JP, Ben-Josef E, Bhargava P, Casper ES, Kim P et al (2007) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN 5(10):998–1033CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Imanaga H (1960) A new method of pancreaticoduodenectomy designed to preserve liver and pancreatic function. Surgery 47:577–586PubMed Imanaga H (1960) A new method of pancreaticoduodenectomy designed to preserve liver and pancreatic function. Surgery 47:577–586PubMed
23.
go back to reference Diener MK, Knaebel H-P, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245(2):187–200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Diener MK, Knaebel H-P, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245(2):187–200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Diener MK, Heukaeufer C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel H-P et al (2008) Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub2 Diener MK, Heukaeufer C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel H-P et al (2008) Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from: http://​doi.​wiley.​com/​10.​1002/​14651858.​CD006053.​pub2
25.
go back to reference Ballay JL, Mallédant Y, Bléry C, Quemener C (1994) Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastroduodenal surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Rèanim 13(5 Suppl):S135–S137CrossRefPubMed Ballay JL, Mallédant Y, Bléry C, Quemener C (1994) Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastroduodenal surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Rèanim 13(5 Suppl):S135–S137CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)—an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)—an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591 Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591
30.
go back to reference Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688CrossRefPubMed Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Morris-Stiff G, Tamijmarane A, Tan Y-M, Shapey I, Bhati C, Mayer AD et al (2011) Pre-operative stenting is associated with a higher prevalence of post-operative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 9(2):145–149CrossRefPubMed Morris-Stiff G, Tamijmarane A, Tan Y-M, Shapey I, Bhati C, Mayer AD et al (2011) Pre-operative stenting is associated with a higher prevalence of post-operative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 9(2):145–149CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230(2):131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230(2):131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F, Janny S, Sockeel P, Kianmanesh R et al (2006) Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 202(1):93–99CrossRefPubMed Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F, Janny S, Sockeel P, Kianmanesh R et al (2006) Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 202(1):93–99CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference da Costa DW, Boerma D, van Santvoort HC, Horvath KD, Werner J, Carter CR et al (2014) Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis: management strategies for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 101(1):e65–e79CrossRefPubMed da Costa DW, Boerma D, van Santvoort HC, Horvath KD, Werner J, Carter CR et al (2014) Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis: management strategies for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 101(1):e65–e79CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Chen VK, Arguedas MR, Baron TH (2005) Expandable metal biliary stents before pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a Monte-Carlo decision analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(12):1229–1237CrossRefPubMed Chen VK, Arguedas MR, Baron TH (2005) Expandable metal biliary stents before pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a Monte-Carlo decision analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(12):1229–1237CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Sanjeevi S, Ivanics T, Lundell L, Kartalis N, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Blomberg J et al (2016) Impact of delay between imaging and treatment in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer: timing of surgery in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 103(3):267–275CrossRefPubMed Sanjeevi S, Ivanics T, Lundell L, Kartalis N, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Blomberg J et al (2016) Impact of delay between imaging and treatment in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer: timing of surgery in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 103(3):267–275CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Yu J, Blackford AL, dal Molin M, Wolfgang CL, Goggins M (2015) Time to progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from low-to-high tumour stages. Gut 64(11):1783–1789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu J, Blackford AL, dal Molin M, Wolfgang CL, Goggins M (2015) Time to progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from low-to-high tumour stages. Gut 64(11):1783–1789CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Glant JA, Waters JA, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA et al (2011) Does the interval from imaging to operation affect the rate of unanticipated metastasis encountered during operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Surgery 150(4):607–616CrossRefPubMed Glant JA, Waters JA, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA et al (2011) Does the interval from imaging to operation affect the rate of unanticipated metastasis encountered during operation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Surgery 150(4):607–616CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC et al (2003) Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 57(6):633–638CrossRefPubMed Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC et al (2003) Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 57(6):633–638CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCK, Wong RCK, Ferrari AP, Montes H et al (2002) Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56(5):652–656CrossRefPubMed Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCK, Wong RCK, Ferrari AP, Montes H et al (2002) Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56(5):652–656CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Unnecessary preoperative biliary drainage: impact on perioperative outcomes of resectable periampullary tumors
Authors
Jean-Baptiste Cazauran
Julie Perinel
Vahan Kepenekian
Michel El Bechwaty
Gennaro Nappo
Mathieu Pioche
Thierry Ponchon
Mustapha Adham
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1635-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2017 Go to the issue