Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2017

01-02-2017 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Relationship between the surgical margin status, prognosis, and recurrence in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients

Authors: Hiroshi Kurahara, Kosei Maemura, Yuko Mataki, Masahiko Sakoda, Satoshi Iino, Yota Kawasaki, Shinichiro Mori, Yuko Kijima, Shinichi Ueno, Hiroyuki Shinchi, Sonshin Takao, Shoji Natsugoe

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between the surgical margin status of the bile duct and the prognosis and recurrence of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent surgery for EHBD cancer between February 2002 and September 2014 were analyzed. The ductal margin status was classified into the following three categories: negative (D-N), positive with carcinoma in situ (D-CIS), and positive with invasive carcinoma (D-INV).

Results

The number of patients with D-N, D-CIS, and D-INV was 69, 16, and 15, respectively. Local recurrence rates of patients with D-CIS (56.3 %) and D-INV (66.7 %) were significantly higher compared to those of patients with D-N (10.1 %; P < 0.001). D-CIS was a significant predictor of shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS). Lymph node metastasis (P = 0.037) and D-INV (P = 0.008) were independent predictors of shorter disease-specific survival (DSS). The prognostic relevance of the ductal margin status was high, particularly in patients without lymph node metastasis.

Conclusion

The surgical margin status of the bile duct was significantly associated with RFS, DSS, and the recurrence site.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ et al (2005) Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg 241:77–184PubMedPubMedCentral Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ et al (2005) Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg 241:77–184PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Wakai T, Shirai Y, Moroda T et al (2005) Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 103:1210–1216CrossRefPubMed Wakai T, Shirai Y, Moroda T et al (2005) Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 103:1210–1216CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sasaki R, Takeda Y, Funato O et al (2007) Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 31:1788–1796CrossRefPubMed Sasaki R, Takeda Y, Funato O et al (2007) Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 31:1788–1796CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2011) Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:651–658CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2011) Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:651–658CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Konishi M, Iwasaki M, Ochiai A et al (2010) Clinical impact of intraoperative histological examination of the ductal resection margin in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 97:1363–1368CrossRefPubMed Konishi M, Iwasaki M, Ochiai A et al (2010) Clinical impact of intraoperative histological examination of the ductal resection margin in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 97:1363–1368CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nakanishi Y, Kondo S, Zen Y et al (2010) Impact of residual in situ carcinoma on postoperative survival in 125 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:166–173CrossRefPubMed Nakanishi Y, Kondo S, Zen Y et al (2010) Impact of residual in situ carcinoma on postoperative survival in 125 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:166–173CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Han IW, Jang JY, Lee KB et al (2014) Clinicopathological analysis and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with a microscopic positive ductal margin. HPB 16:575–581CrossRefPubMed Han IW, Jang JY, Lee KB et al (2014) Clinicopathological analysis and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with a microscopic positive ductal margin. HPB 16:575–581CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hernandez J, Cowgill SM, Al-Saadi S et al (2008) An aggressive approach to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is warranted: margin status does not impact survival after resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:807–814CrossRefPubMed Hernandez J, Cowgill SM, Al-Saadi S et al (2008) An aggressive approach to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is warranted: margin status does not impact survival after resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:807–814CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Qiao QL, Zhang TP, Guo JC et al (2011) Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Am Surg 77:1445–1448PubMed Qiao QL, Zhang TP, Guo JC et al (2011) Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Am Surg 77:1445–1448PubMed
10.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, International Union against Cancer (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, International Union against Cancer (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell
11.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a surgery. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a surgery. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Higuchi R, Ota T, Araida T et al (2010) Prognostic relevance of ductal margins in operative resection of bile duct cancer. Surgery 148:7–14CrossRefPubMed Higuchi R, Ota T, Araida T et al (2010) Prognostic relevance of ductal margins in operative resection of bile duct cancer. Surgery 148:7–14CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakanishi Y, Zen Y, Kawakami H et al (2008) Extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma with extensive intraepithelial spread: a clinicopathological study of 21 cases. Mod Pathol 21:807–816CrossRefPubMed Nakanishi Y, Zen Y, Kawakami H et al (2008) Extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma with extensive intraepithelial spread: a clinicopathological study of 21 cases. Mod Pathol 21:807–816CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Furukawa T, Higuchi R, Yamamoto M (2014) Clinical relevance of frozen diagnosis of ductal margins in surgery of bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:459–462CrossRefPubMed Furukawa T, Higuchi R, Yamamoto M (2014) Clinical relevance of frozen diagnosis of ductal margins in surgery of bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:459–462CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Oguro S, Esaki M, Kishi Y et al (2015) Optimal indications for additional resection of the invasive cancer-positive proximal bile duct margin in cases of advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1915–1924CrossRefPubMed Oguro S, Esaki M, Kishi Y et al (2015) Optimal indications for additional resection of the invasive cancer-positive proximal bile duct margin in cases of advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1915–1924CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ et al (2005) Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg 241:77–84PubMedPubMedCentral Jang JY, Kim SW, Park DJ et al (2005) Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection. Ann Surg 241:77–84PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T et al (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 102:399–406CrossRefPubMed Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T et al (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 102:399–406CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ryoo I, Lee JM, Chung YE et al (2010) Gadobutrol-enhanced, three-dimensional, dynamic MR imaging with MR cholangiography for the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer. Investig Radiol 45:217–224CrossRef Ryoo I, Lee JM, Chung YE et al (2010) Gadobutrol-enhanced, three-dimensional, dynamic MR imaging with MR cholangiography for the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer. Investig Radiol 45:217–224CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S et al (2010) Multiditector computed tomography for preoperative prediction of postsurgical prognosis of patients with extrahepatic biliary cancer. J Surg Oncol 101:376–383PubMed Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S et al (2010) Multiditector computed tomography for preoperative prediction of postsurgical prognosis of patients with extrahepatic biliary cancer. J Surg Oncol 101:376–383PubMed
Metadata
Title
Relationship between the surgical margin status, prognosis, and recurrence in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients
Authors
Hiroshi Kurahara
Kosei Maemura
Yuko Mataki
Masahiko Sakoda
Satoshi Iino
Yota Kawasaki
Shinichiro Mori
Yuko Kijima
Shinichi Ueno
Hiroyuki Shinchi
Sonshin Takao
Shoji Natsugoe
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1491-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue