Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Increased rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after deep enucleation of small pancreatic tumors

Authors: Kristin Heeger, Massimo Falconi, Stefano Partelli, Jens Waldmann, Stefano Crippa, Volker Fendrich, Detlef K. Bartsch

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Only small, potentially benign pancreatic tumors located ≥3 mm distant from the main pancreatic duct (MPD) are considered good candidates for enucleation. This study evaluates the outcome of enucleations with regard to their distance to the MPD.

Methods

Clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of prospectively documented patients with small (≤30 mm), potentially benign pancreatic tumors, who underwent enucleation, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups, either deep enucleation (DE, distance ≤3 mm) or standard enucleation (SE, distance >3 mm), as determined by intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS).

Results

Sixty patients underwent DE (n = 30) or SE (n = 30) with IOUS. Both groups did not differ regarding age, tumor size, pathology, and operating time. Complications occurred in 24/30 (80 %) patients of the DE group compared to 15/30 (50 %) patients after SE (P = 0.029). Mortality was nil. The most frequent complication was pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurring in 22/30 (73.3 %) patients after DE and 9/30 (30 %) patients undergoing SE (P = 0.002). Especially, the rate of clinically significant POPF types B and C was higher after DE (21 of 30 patients) compared to SE (7 of 30 patients, P = 0.0006). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed DE as the only significant factor that negatively influenced the occurrence of POPF. Postoperative hospital stay tended to be longer after DE (15 vs. 11.5 days, P = 0.050). All but two patients with metastatic gastrinoma and two patients, who died of unrelated causes, showed no evidence of disease after a median follow-up of 24 (3–235) months.

Conclusions

Deep enucleation of small, potentially benign pancreatic tumors should be considered with caution given the high rate of clinically relevant POPF.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Megibow AJ, Lombardo FP, Guarise A, Carbognin G, Scholes J, Rofsky NM, Macari M, Balthazar EJ, Procacci C (2001) Cystic masses: cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. Abdom Imaging 26:640–647PubMedCrossRef Megibow AJ, Lombardo FP, Guarise A, Carbognin G, Scholes J, Rofsky NM, Macari M, Balthazar EJ, Procacci C (2001) Cystic masses: cross-sectional imaging observations and serial follow-up. Abdom Imaging 26:640–647PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Plockinger U, Wiedemann B (2002) Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system: the role of early diagnosis, genetic testing and preventive surgery. Dig Dis 20:49–60PubMedCrossRef Plockinger U, Wiedemann B (2002) Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system: the role of early diagnosis, genetic testing and preventive surgery. Dig Dis 20:49–60PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Falconi M, Mantovani W, Crippa S, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Pederzoli P (2008) Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours. Br J Surg 95:85–91PubMedCrossRef Falconi M, Mantovani W, Crippa S, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Pederzoli P (2008) Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours. Br J Surg 95:85–91PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kahl S, Malferheiner P (2004) Exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:947–955PubMedCrossRef Kahl S, Malferheiner P (2004) Exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:947–955PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Crippa S, Boninsegna L, Partelli S, Falconi M (2010) Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J Hepato-Biliary Pancreat Sci 17:782–787CrossRef Crippa S, Boninsegna L, Partelli S, Falconi M (2010) Parenchyma-sparing resections for pancreatic neoplasms. J Hepato-Biliary Pancreat Sci 17:782–787CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Crippa S, Bassi M, Salvia R, Falconi M, Butturini G, Pederzoli P (2007) Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 94:1254–1259PubMedCrossRef Crippa S, Bassi M, Salvia R, Falconi M, Butturini G, Pederzoli P (2007) Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 94:1254–1259PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Casadei R, Ricci C, Rega D, D'Ambra M, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, Campana D, Nori F, Minni F (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors less than 4 cm in diameter: resect or enucleate? A single-center experience. Pancreas 39:825–828PubMedCrossRef Casadei R, Ricci C, Rega D, D'Ambra M, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, Campana D, Nori F, Minni F (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors less than 4 cm in diameter: resect or enucleate? A single-center experience. Pancreas 39:825–828PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kiely JM, Nakeeb A, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Pitt HA (2003) Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect? J Gastrointest Surg 7:890–897PubMedCrossRef Kiely JM, Nakeeb A, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Pitt HA (2003) Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect? J Gastrointest Surg 7:890–897PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Talamini MA, Moesinger R, Yeo CJ, Poulose B, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, Pitt HA (1998) Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation? Ann Surg 227:896–903PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Talamini MA, Moesinger R, Yeo CJ, Poulose B, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, Pitt HA (1998) Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation? Ann Surg 227:896–903PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pitt SC, Pitt HA, Baker MS, Christians K, Touzios JG, Kiely JM, Weber SM, Wilson SD, Howard TJ, Talamonti MS, Rikkers LF (2009) Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1692–1698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pitt SC, Pitt HA, Baker MS, Christians K, Touzios JG, Kiely JM, Weber SM, Wilson SD, Howard TJ, Talamonti MS, Rikkers LF (2009) Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1692–1698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nikfarjam M, Warshaw AL, Axelrod L, Deshpande V, Thayer SP, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2008) Improved contemporary surgical management of insulinomas. A 24-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Surg 247:165–172PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nikfarjam M, Warshaw AL, Axelrod L, Deshpande V, Thayer SP, Ferrone CR, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2008) Improved contemporary surgical management of insulinomas. A 24-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Ann Surg 247:165–172PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Falconi M, Zerbi A, Crippa S, Balzano G, Boninsegna L, Capitanio V, Bassi C, Di Carlo V, Pederzoli P (2010) Parenchyma-preserving resections for small non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1621–1627PubMedCrossRef Falconi M, Zerbi A, Crippa S, Balzano G, Boninsegna L, Capitanio V, Bassi C, Di Carlo V, Pederzoli P (2010) Parenchyma-preserving resections for small non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1621–1627PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Madan AK, Weldon CB, Long WP, Raafat JD (2004) Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol 15:193–198CrossRef Madan AK, Weldon CB, Long WP, Raafat JD (2004) Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol 15:193–198CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sciaudone G, Perniceni T, Levy P, Bougaran J, Gayet B (2000) Enucleation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the head of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 24:17–20 Sciaudone G, Perniceni T, Levy P, Bougaran J, Gayet B (2000) Enucleation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the head of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 24:17–20
15.
go back to reference Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S, Strobel O, Schneider L, Hartwig W, Büchler MW, Werner J (2011) Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1197–1203PubMedCrossRef Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S, Strobel O, Schneider L, Hartwig W, Büchler MW, Werner J (2011) Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1197–1203PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Langer P, Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Kann PH, Rothmund M, Zielke A (2005) Minimal-invasive operative treatment of organic hyperinsulinism. Dtsch Med Wochschr 130:514–530CrossRef Langer P, Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Kann PH, Rothmund M, Zielke A (2005) Minimal-invasive operative treatment of organic hyperinsulinism. Dtsch Med Wochschr 130:514–530CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fernandez-Cruz L, Blanco L, Cosa R, Rendon H (2008) Is laparoscopic resection adequate in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors? World J Surg 32:904–917PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-Cruz L, Blanco L, Cosa R, Rendon H (2008) Is laparoscopic resection adequate in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors? World J Surg 32:904–917PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Brient C, Regenet N, Sulpice L, Brunaud L, Mucci-Hennekine S, Carrère N, Milin J, Ayav A, Pradere B, Hamy A, Bresler L, Meunier B, Mirallié E (2012) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulization subsequent to enucleation. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1883–1887PubMedCrossRef Brient C, Regenet N, Sulpice L, Brunaud L, Mucci-Hennekine S, Carrère N, Milin J, Ayav A, Pradere B, Hamy A, Bresler L, Meunier B, Mirallié E (2012) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulization subsequent to enucleation. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1883–1887PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Büchler M (2005) International study group on pancreatic fistula definition (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Büchler M (2005) International study group on pancreatic fistula definition (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG (2002) Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG (2002) Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection. Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMedCrossRef Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection. Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY, Bentrem DJ (2008) Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg 247:490–500PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY, Bentrem DJ (2008) Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg 247:490–500PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Norton JA (2006) Surgery for primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 10:327–331PubMedCrossRef Norton JA (2006) Surgery for primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 10:327–331PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, Ku YM, Byun JY, Lee JM (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62:371–377PubMedCrossRef Rha SE, Jung SE, Lee KH, Ku YM, Byun JY, Lee JM (2007) CT and MR imaging findings of endocrine tumor of the pancreas according to WHO classification. Eur J Radiol 62:371–377PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Langer P, Kann PH, Fendrich V, Richter G, Diehl S, Rothmund M, Bartsch DK (2004) Prospective evaluation of imaging procedures fort he detection of pancreaticoduodenal tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. World J Surg 28:1317–1322PubMedCrossRef Langer P, Kann PH, Fendrich V, Richter G, Diehl S, Rothmund M, Bartsch DK (2004) Prospective evaluation of imaging procedures fort he detection of pancreaticoduodenal tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. World J Surg 28:1317–1322PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Balzano G, Zerbi A, Veronesi P, Cristallo, Di Carlo MV (2003) Surgical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreatic body. Dig Surg 20:506–510PubMedCrossRef Balzano G, Zerbi A, Veronesi P, Cristallo, Di Carlo MV (2003) Surgical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreatic body. Dig Surg 20:506–510PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Farrell J, Kochman ML, Foley PJ, Drebin J, Oh YS, Ginsberg G, Ahmad N, Merchant NB, Isbell J, Parikh AA, Stokes JB, Bauer T, Adams RB, Simeone DM (2008) Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas ≤3 cm in size: Is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastroenterol Surg 12:234–242CrossRef Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Farrell J, Kochman ML, Foley PJ, Drebin J, Oh YS, Ginsberg G, Ahmad N, Merchant NB, Isbell J, Parikh AA, Stokes JB, Bauer T, Adams RB, Simeone DM (2008) Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas ≤3 cm in size: Is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastroenterol Surg 12:234–242CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Büchler MW (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Büchler MW (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fernández-Cruz L, Molina V, Vallejos R, Jiménez Chavarria E, López-Boado MA, Ferrer J (2012) Outcome after laparoscopic enucleation for non-functional neuroendocrine pancreatic tumours. HPB (Oxford) 14:171–176CrossRef Fernández-Cruz L, Molina V, Vallejos R, Jiménez Chavarria E, López-Boado MA, Ferrer J (2012) Outcome after laparoscopic enucleation for non-functional neuroendocrine pancreatic tumours. HPB (Oxford) 14:171–176CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Drymousis P, Raptis DA, Spalding D, Fernandez-Cruz L, Menon D, Breitenstein S, Davidson B, Frilling A. Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2013 [Epub ahead of print]. Drymousis P, Raptis DA, Spalding D, Fernandez-Cruz L, Menon D, Breitenstein S, Davidson B, Frilling A. Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
33.
go back to reference Bartsch DK, Waldmann J, Fendrich V, Boninsegna L, Lopez CL, Partelli S, Falconi M (2012) Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after surgery for sporadic gastrinoma. Br J Surg 99:1234–1240PubMedCrossRef Bartsch DK, Waldmann J, Fendrich V, Boninsegna L, Lopez CL, Partelli S, Falconi M (2012) Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after surgery for sporadic gastrinoma. Br J Surg 99:1234–1240PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Increased rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after deep enucleation of small pancreatic tumors
Authors
Kristin Heeger
Massimo Falconi
Stefano Partelli
Jens Waldmann
Stefano Crippa
Volker Fendrich
Detlef K. Bartsch
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1171-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 3/2014 Go to the issue