Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Review Article

Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care

Authors: Gencay Hatiboglu, Dogu Teber, Markus Hohenfellner

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has first been performed in 2000 and has since then become a widespread and often performed therapy option for surgical treatment of prostate cancer. The purpose of this review was to highlight the current clinical concepts for radical prostatectomy.

Discussion and conclusions

Actual literature search was performed in PubMed database and reviewed. Different surgical techniques for RARP are presented. Oncologic and functional outcomes of RARP are discussed and compared to radical retropubic prostatectomy. In conclusion, RARP has equal oncologic and functional outcome in localized prostate cancer. RARP as a less invasive treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer should be considered as a new standard of care by now.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (2001) Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 28:555–565PubMedCrossRef Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (2001) Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 28:555–565PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Eley JW, Albertsen PC, Harlan LC, Potosky AL (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. JAMA 283:354–360PubMedCrossRef Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Eley JW, Albertsen PC, Harlan LC, Potosky AL (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. JAMA 283:354–360PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sriprasad S, Feneley MR, Thompson PM (2009) History of prostate cancer treatment. Surg Oncol 18:185–191PubMedCrossRef Sriprasad S, Feneley MR, Thompson PM (2009) History of prostate cancer treatment. Surg Oncol 18:185–191PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Young HH (2002) The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. 1905. J Urol 168:914–921PubMedCrossRef Young HH (2002) The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. 1905. J Urol 168:914–921PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Walsh PC (2007) The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 177:1632–1635PubMedCrossRef Walsh PC (2007) The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 177:1632–1635PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Walsh PC, Jewett HJ (1980) Radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Cancer 45:1906–1911PubMed Walsh PC, Jewett HJ (1980) Radical surgery for prostatic cancer. Cancer 45:1906–1911PubMed
8.
go back to reference Prasad SM, Gu X, Lavelle R, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC (2011) Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185:111–115PubMedCrossRef Prasad SM, Gu X, Lavelle R, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC (2011) Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185:111–115PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC (1991) Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol 145:512–514, discussion 514–515PubMed Steiner MS, Morton RA, Walsh PC (1991) Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence. J Urol 145:512–514, discussion 514–515PubMed
10.
go back to reference Walsh PC, Quinlan DM, Morton RA, Steiner MS (1990) Radical retropubic prostatectomy. Improved anastomosis and urinary continence. Urol Clin North Am 17:679–684PubMed Walsh PC, Quinlan DM, Morton RA, Steiner MS (1990) Radical retropubic prostatectomy. Improved anastomosis and urinary continence. Urol Clin North Am 17:679–684PubMed
11.
go back to reference Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Zanni G, Briganti A, Deho’ F, Naspro R, Farina E, Rigatti P (2005) Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48:938–945PubMedCrossRef Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Zanni G, Briganti A, Deho’ F, Naspro R, Farina E, Rigatti P (2005) Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48:938–945PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Walsh PC (2000) Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 163:1802–1807PubMedCrossRef Walsh PC (2000) Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 163:1802–1807PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schuessler W, Kavoussi L, Clayman R, Vancaille T (1992) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 147: Abstract No. 130 Schuessler W, Kavoussi L, Clayman R, Vancaille T (1992) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report. J Urol 147: Abstract No. 130
14.
go back to reference Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50:854–857PubMedCrossRef Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50:854–857PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643–1649PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, Taille AdL, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Janetschek G, Nassar F, Turk I, Vanni AJ, Gill IS, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Pineiro LM, Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Bjartell A, Jiborn T, Eden C, Richards AJ, Velthoven RV, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Su LM, Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Touijer KA, Vickers A, Guillonneau B (2010) The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol 184:2291–2296PubMedCrossRef Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, Taille AdL, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Janetschek G, Nassar F, Turk I, Vanni AJ, Gill IS, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Pineiro LM, Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Bjartell A, Jiborn T, Eden C, Richards AJ, Velthoven RV, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Su LM, Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Touijer KA, Vickers A, Guillonneau B (2010) The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol 184:2291–2296PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR (2009) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 104:1428–1435PubMedCrossRef Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR (2009) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 104:1428–1435PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410PubMedCrossRef Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Lobontiu A, Saint F, Cicco A, Antiphon P, Chopin D (2000) Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 10:520–523PubMed Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Lobontiu A, Saint F, Cicco A, Antiphon P, Chopin D (2000) Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol 10:520–523PubMed
20.
go back to reference Su L-M (2010) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005. Curr Opin Urol 20:130–135PubMedCrossRef Su L-M (2010) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since 2005. Curr Opin Urol 20:130–135PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1738–1741PubMedCrossRef Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1738–1741PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Busch C, Nordling S, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spangberg A, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Johansson JE (2008) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1144–1154PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, Ruutu M, Garmo H, Busch C, Nordling S, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spangberg A, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Johansson JE (2008) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1144–1154PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid H-P, Tvd K, Wiegel T, Zattoni F (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61–71PubMedCrossRef Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid H-P, Tvd K, Wiegel T, Zattoni F (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61–71PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Williams SB, Prasad SM, Weinberg AC, Shelton JB, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC (2010) Trends in the care of radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2006. BJU Int (in press) Williams SB, Prasad SM, Weinberg AC, Shelton JB, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC (2010) Trends in the care of radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2006. BJU Int (in press)
25.
go back to reference Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan G, Hemal A, Shrivastava A, Menon M (2002) Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 60:569–572PubMedCrossRef Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan G, Hemal A, Shrivastava A, Menon M (2002) Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 60:569–572PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC (2003) Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 91:749–757PubMedCrossRef Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC (2003) Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 91:749–757PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kawakita M, Sato M, Oguchi N, Muguruma K, Murota T, Matsuda T (2001) Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Montsouris technique: experience in initial 5 cases. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 92:506–512PubMed Kawakita M, Sato M, Oguchi N, Muguruma K, Murota T, Matsuda T (2001) Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Montsouris technique: experience in initial 5 cases. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 92:506–512PubMed
28.
go back to reference Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, Team V (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169:2289–2292PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J, Team V (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169:2289–2292PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50:849–853PubMedCrossRef Raboy A, Ferzli G, Albert P (1997) Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 50:849–853PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, Konig F, Aedtner B, Dorschner W (2002) The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 20:48–55PubMedCrossRef Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, Konig F, Aedtner B, Dorschner W (2002) The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 20:48–55PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Katz R, Borkowski T, Antiphon P, Lobontiu A, Abbou CC (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 170:416–419PubMedCrossRef Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Katz R, Borkowski T, Antiphon P, Lobontiu A, Abbou CC (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 170:416–419PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175:945–950, discussion 951PubMedCrossRef Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175:945–950, discussion 951PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, Graefen M, Haese A, Montironi R, Montorsi F, Moul JW, Novara G, Sauter G, Sulser T, Poel H (2010) Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol 57:735–746PubMedCrossRef Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, Graefen M, Haese A, Montironi R, Montorsi F, Moul JW, Novara G, Sauter G, Sulser T, Poel H (2010) Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol 57:735–746PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Moniz RR, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Coughlin G, Patel VR (2010) Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 57:945–952PubMedCrossRef Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Moniz RR, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Coughlin G, Patel VR (2010) Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 57:945–952PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M (2007) Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110:1951–1958PubMedCrossRef Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M (2007) Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110:1951–1958PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D’Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2009) A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 104:534–539PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D’Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2009) A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 104:534–539PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW (2004) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 63:819–822PubMedCrossRef Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW (2004) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 63:819–822PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lo KL, Ng CF, Lam CN, Hou SS, To KF, Yip SK (2010) Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med J 16:31–35PubMed Lo KL, Ng CF, Lam CN, Hou SS, To KF, Yip SK (2010) Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate. Hong Kong Med J 16:31–35PubMed
39.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24:2003–2015PubMedCrossRef Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24:2003–2015PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O (2009) Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 104:991–995PubMedCrossRef Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O (2009) Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 104:991–995PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A, Plebani M, Artibani W (2008) Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101:1145–1149PubMedCrossRef Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A, Plebani M, Artibani W (2008) Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101:1145–1149PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Orvieto MA, Alsikafi NF, Shalhav AL, Laven BA, Steinberg GD, Zagaja GP, Brendler CB (2006) Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:1199–1203PubMedCrossRef Orvieto MA, Alsikafi NF, Shalhav AL, Laven BA, Steinberg GD, Zagaja GP, Brendler CB (2006) Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:1199–1203PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT (2005) Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 174:903–907PubMedCrossRef Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT (2005) Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 174:903–907PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Wright JL, Dalkin BL, True LD, Ellis WJ, Stanford JL, Lange PH, Lin DW (2010) Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 183:2213–2218PubMedCrossRef Wright JL, Dalkin BL, True LD, Ellis WJ, Stanford JL, Lange PH, Lin DW (2010) Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 183:2213–2218PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chun FK, Graefen M, Zacharias M, Haese A, Steuber T, Schlomm T, Walz J, Karakiewicz PI, Huland H (2006) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 24:273–280PubMedCrossRef Chun FK, Graefen M, Zacharias M, Haese A, Steuber T, Schlomm T, Walz J, Karakiewicz PI, Huland H (2006) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 24:273–280PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, Walsh PC (2004) An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol 171:23–26PubMedCrossRef Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, Walsh PC (2004) An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol 171:23–26PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ (2009) Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 55:1358–1366PubMedCrossRef Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ (2009) Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 55:1358–1366PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su L-M, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, Han M, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP (2010) Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int (in press) Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su L-M, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, Han M, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP (2010) Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int (in press)
50.
go back to reference Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG, Sammon J, Siddiqui SA, Diaz M (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol (in press) Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG, Sammon J, Siddiqui SA, Diaz M (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol (in press)
51.
go back to reference Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, Gross AJ, Jonas U, Burchardt M (2007) Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 25:149–160PubMedCrossRef Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, Gross AJ, Jonas U, Burchardt M (2007) Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 25:149–160PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, Bozzini G, Gazzano G, Morabito A (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175:2201–2206PubMedCrossRef Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, Bozzini G, Gazzano G, Morabito A (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175:2201–2206PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56:472–478PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56:472–478PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S, Takenaka A, El-Tabi N, Te A, Vaughan ED (2007) Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 69:726–731PubMedCrossRef Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S, Takenaka A, El-Tabi N, Te A, Vaughan ED (2007) Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 69:726–731PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Mendiola FP, Zorn KC, Mikhail AA, Lin S, Orvieto MA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2008) Urinary and sexual function outcomes among different age groups after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol 22:519–524PubMedCrossRef Mendiola FP, Zorn KC, Mikhail AA, Lin S, Orvieto MA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2008) Urinary and sexual function outcomes among different age groups after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol 22:519–524PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, Gettman MT (2009) Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 103:448–453PubMedCrossRef Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, Gettman MT (2009) Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 103:448–453PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A (2010) A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol (in press) Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A (2010) A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol (in press)
58.
go back to reference Wolin KY, Luly J, Sutcliffe S, Andriole GL, Kibel AS (2010) Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity. J Urol 183:629–633PubMedCrossRef Wolin KY, Luly J, Sutcliffe S, Andriole GL, Kibel AS (2010) Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity. J Urol 183:629–633PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Teber D, Sofikerim M, Ates M, Gozen AS, Guven O, Sanli O, Rassweiler J (2010) Is type 2 diabetes mellitus a predictive factor for incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? A matched pair and multivariate analysis. J Urol 183:1087–1091PubMedCrossRef Teber D, Sofikerim M, Ates M, Gozen AS, Guven O, Sanli O, Rassweiler J (2010) Is type 2 diabetes mellitus a predictive factor for incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? A matched pair and multivariate analysis. J Urol 183:1087–1091PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Orvieto MA, Patel VR (2009) Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 98:76–88PubMed Orvieto MA, Patel VR (2009) Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 98:76–88PubMed
61.
go back to reference Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ (2004) Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 94:1071–1076PubMedCrossRef Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ (2004) Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 94:1071–1076PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Patel VR (2010) Techniques of nerve-sparing and potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 36:259–272PubMedCrossRef Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Patel VR (2010) Techniques of nerve-sparing and potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 36:259–272PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, Peabody JO (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51:648–657, discussion 657–648PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, Peabody JO (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51:648–657, discussion 657–648PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Kaul S, Savera A, Badani K, Fumo M, Bhandari A, Menon M (2006) Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 97:467–472PubMedCrossRef Kaul S, Savera A, Badani K, Fumo M, Bhandari A, Menon M (2006) Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 97:467–472PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M (2006) Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “Veil of Aphrodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur Urol 49:1065–1073, discussion 1073–1064PubMedCrossRef Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M (2006) Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “Veil of Aphrodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur Urol 49:1065–1073, discussion 1073–1064PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Potdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, Kim IY (2009) Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 23:1479–1484PubMedCrossRef Potdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, Kim IY (2009) Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 23:1479–1484PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2011) Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 107:100–104PubMedCrossRef Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2011) Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 107:100–104PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92:205–210PubMedCrossRef Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92:205–210PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2002) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 60:864–868PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2002) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 60:864–868PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care
Authors
Gencay Hatiboglu
Dogu Teber
Markus Hohenfellner
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0743-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 3/2012 Go to the issue