Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2010

Open Access 01-08-2010 | Original Article

Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study

Authors: Traian Dumitrascu, Leonard David, Irinel Popescu

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aims

Posterior approach pancreatoduodenectomy (paPD) technique is one of the many modifications of the standard Whipple procedure (sPD). The most important modification of the technique is first approach of the superior mesenteric artery, thus enabling a complete dissection of the right side of this artery and of the portal vein, as well as a complete excision of the retroportal pancreatic lamina. The present study is a case-match one, comparing the paPD to sPD.

Materials and methods

The present study includes two groups of patients. A first group of 21 patients with PD by posterior approach (group 1, reference group, paPD) and a second group including 21 matched patients with PD by standard approach (group 2, control group, sPD). Demographic characteristics (sex, age), intraoperative data (approach type, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, need for vascular resections and type of reconstruction, type of resection upon remnant tissue), histological diagnosis and pathology data (tumor location, TNM staging, tumor grading, tumor vascular invasion), patient outcomes (postoperative length of stay, in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity, survival time) were analyzed in both groups of patients and compared.

Results

There were no significant differences in the two groups regarding early morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospitalization, overall survival, and survival according to tumor type. However, it was noticed that there was a significant lesser mean blood loss in the pa PD group vs SPD group (P = 0.0314) and a shorter operative time in the paPD group vs sPD group (P = 0.0002).

Conclusion

The paPD offers an early selection of patients during the operation (in terms of local resectability, by assessing the SMA infiltration), allows an optimal exposure of arterial abnormalities (a replaced right hepatic artery from the SMA), and better detection of venous invasion. In cases with PV/SMV invasion, paPD is particularly useful allowing a “no-touch” resection with no intraportal tumor dissemination and facilitates the vascular reconstruction. In addition, the operative bleeding and time are lower in the paPD group, probably due to early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and reduced congestion of the pancreatic head.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ionescu M, Stroescu C, Barbuta S, Ciurea S, Popescu I (2003) Pancreatoduodenectomy—routine surgery? Chirurgia (Bucur) 98:103–108 Ionescu M, Stroescu C, Barbuta S, Ciurea S, Popescu I (2003) Pancreatoduodenectomy—routine surgery? Chirurgia (Bucur) 98:103–108
3.
go back to reference Bachellier P, Tierris J, Wener JC, Pai M (2006) Current Practice in Pancreatic Surgery. In Habib NA and Canelo R (eds.) Liver and Pancreatic Diseases Management. Springer, pp 112–5 Bachellier P, Tierris J, Wener JC, Pai M (2006) Current Practice in Pancreatic Surgery. In Habib NA and Canelo R (eds.) Liver and Pancreatic Diseases Management. Springer, pp 112–5
4.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Brennan MF (2008) The Kausch-Whipple Pancreatectomy. In Beger HG, Matsuno S, and Cameron JL (eds.) Diseases of the Pancreas—Current Surgical Therapy. Springer, pp 567–79 Ferrone CR, Brennan MF (2008) The Kausch-Whipple Pancreatectomy. In Beger HG, Matsuno S, and Cameron JL (eds.) Diseases of the Pancreas—Current Surgical Therapy. Springer, pp 567–79
5.
go back to reference Howard JM (1997) Historical Aspects and the Future of Pancreatoduodenectomy. In Hanyu F and Takasaki K (eds.) Pancreatoduodenectomy. Springer, pp 3–10 Howard JM (1997) Historical Aspects and the Future of Pancreatoduodenectomy. In Hanyu F and Takasaki K (eds.) Pancreatoduodenectomy. Springer, pp 3–10
6.
go back to reference Schulick RD, Cameron JL (2008) Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy. In Beger HG, Matsuno S, and Cameron JL (eds.) Diseases of the pancreas—current surgical therapy. Springer, pp 581–91 Schulick RD, Cameron JL (2008) Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy. In Beger HG, Matsuno S, and Cameron JL (eds.) Diseases of the pancreas—current surgical therapy. Springer, pp 581–91
7.
go back to reference Traverso LW, Longmire WP (1978) Preservation of the pylorus in pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146:959–962PubMed Traverso LW, Longmire WP (1978) Preservation of the pylorus in pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146:959–962PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kausch W (1912) Das Carcinom der Papilla Duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung: beitrage klinischen. Chirurgie 78:439–486 Kausch W (1912) Das Carcinom der Papilla Duodeni und seine radikale Entfernung: beitrage klinischen. Chirurgie 78:439–486
12.
go back to reference Popescu I, David L, Dumitra AM, Dorobantu B (2007) The posterior approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary results. Hepatogastroenterology 54:921–926PubMed Popescu I, David L, Dumitra AM, Dorobantu B (2007) The posterior approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary results. Hepatogastroenterology 54:921–926PubMed
15.
go back to reference Tjarda van Heek N, Kuhlmann KFD, Scholten RJ, de Castro SMM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection. A systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in The Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–790. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000188462.00249.36 CrossRefPubMed Tjarda van Heek N, Kuhlmann KFD, Scholten RJ, de Castro SMM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection. A systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in The Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–790. doi:10.​1097/​01.​sla.​0000188462.​00249.​36 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hanyu F (1997) One thousand pancreatoduodenectomies at a single institution. In Hanyu F and Takasaki K (eds.) Pancreatoduodenectomy, pp 13–21 Hanyu F (1997) One thousand pancreatoduodenectomies at a single institution. In Hanyu F and Takasaki K (eds.) Pancreatoduodenectomy, pp 13–21
20.
22.
go back to reference Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, Bachi V (1991) Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreatoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 11:1831–1848PubMed Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, Bachi V (1991) Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreatoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 11:1831–1848PubMed
24.
go back to reference Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S, Hay JM, Fourtanier G, Fingerhut A, Sastre B, Chippioni J, Fagniez PL, Radovanovic A (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.012 CrossRefPubMed Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S, Hay JM, Fourtanier G, Fingerhut A, Sastre B, Chippioni J, Fagniez PL, Radovanovic A (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2005.​08.​012 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference van Berge Henegouwen DI, de Wit LT, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (1997) Incidence, risk factors and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg 185:18–24. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(97) 00007-0 PubMed van Berge Henegouwen DI, de Wit LT, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (1997) Incidence, risk factors and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg 185:18–24. doi:10.​1016/​S1072-7515(97) 00007-0 PubMed
26.
go back to reference Diener M, Keukaeufer C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel HP, Buchler MW (2008) Pancreatoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary an pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Diener M, Keukaeufer C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Knaebel HP, Buchler MW (2008) Pancreatoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary an pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
27.
go back to reference Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener M, Buchler MW, Friess H (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94:265–273. doi:10.1002/bjs.5716 CrossRefPubMed Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener M, Buchler MW, Friess H (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94:265–273. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5716 CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Machado MCC, Penteado S, Cunha JEM, Jukemura J, Herman P, Bacchella T, Machado MAC, Montagnini AL (2001) Pancreatic head tumors with portal vein involvement: an alternative surgical approach. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1486–1487PubMed Machado MCC, Penteado S, Cunha JEM, Jukemura J, Herman P, Bacchella T, Machado MAC, Montagnini AL (2001) Pancreatic head tumors with portal vein involvement: an alternative surgical approach. Hepatogastroenterology 48:1486–1487PubMed
33.
go back to reference Kaneko T, Nakao A, Inoue S, Nomoto S, Hosono J, Harada A, Nonami T, Takagi H (1995) Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography as a new diagnostic procedure in pancreatic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 42:711–716PubMed Kaneko T, Nakao A, Inoue S, Nomoto S, Hosono J, Harada A, Nonami T, Takagi H (1995) Intraportal endovascular ultrasonography as a new diagnostic procedure in pancreatic surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 42:711–716PubMed
34.
35.
39.
go back to reference Horiguchi A, Ishihara S, Ito M, Nagata H, Shimizu T, Furusawa K, Kato R, Katada K, Miyakawa S (2007) Pancreatoduodenectomy in which dissection of the efferent arteries of the head of the pancreas is performed first. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:575–578. doi:10.1007/s00534-006-1198-x CrossRefPubMed Horiguchi A, Ishihara S, Ito M, Nagata H, Shimizu T, Furusawa K, Kato R, Katada K, Miyakawa S (2007) Pancreatoduodenectomy in which dissection of the efferent arteries of the head of the pancreas is performed first. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:575–578. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-006-1198-x CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Kawai M, Tani M, Ina S, Hirono S, Nishioka R, Miyazawa M, Uchiyama K, Shimamoto T, Yamaue H (2008) CLIP method (preoperative CT image-assessed ligation of inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery) reduces intraoperative bleeding during pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg 32:82–87. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9305-y CrossRefPubMed Kawai M, Tani M, Ina S, Hirono S, Nishioka R, Miyazawa M, Uchiyama K, Shimamoto T, Yamaue H (2008) CLIP method (preoperative CT image-assessed ligation of inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery) reduces intraoperative bleeding during pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Surg 32:82–87. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-007-9305-y CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study
Authors
Traian Dumitrascu
Leonard David
Irinel Popescu
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0499-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2010 Go to the issue

Case Management & Clinical Consequences

Malignant melanoma of the anorectum—a rare entity