Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2005

01-11-2005 | Original Article

Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options

Authors: Christophe Müller, Orlin Belyaev, Thomas Deska, Ansgar Chromik, Dirk Weyhe, Waldemar Uhl

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery is the last resort for patients suffering from severe fecal incontinence. The armamentarium of surgical options for this condition has increased impressively during the last decade. Nevertheless, this fact seems to make neither patients nor surgeons feel more comfortable. Treatment of fecal incontinence still remains a challenge to modern medicine due to many specific sides of this problem.

Aims

This article gives an up-to-date overview of existing operative treatment options.

Methods

An unbiased review of relevant literature was performed to assess the role of all methods of surgical treatment for fecal incontinence available nowadays.

Results

Recent studies have shown poor late results after primary sphincter repair and low predictive value for most preoperative diagnostic tests. New surgical options such as artificial devices and electrically stimulated muscle transpositions are doomed by low success rates and unacceptably frequent complications. That is why current attention has focused on non- or minimally invasive therapies such as sacral nerve stimulation and temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal. However, all these innovative techniques remain experimental till enough high-evidence data are gathered for their objective evaluation.

Conclusion

Careful and detailed preoperative assessment to exactly determine the etiology of incontinence and individual approach remain the cornerstones of surgical treatment of fecal incontinence nowadays.
Literature
1.
Whitehead WE, Wald A, Norton NJ (2001) Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:131–144PubMed
2.
3.
Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C et al (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 50:480–484PubMed
4.
5.
Rao SSC (2004) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 99(8):1585–1604CrossRefPubMed
6.
Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90:1333–1337CrossRefPubMed
7.
Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC (2003) Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1591–1605PubMed
8.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMed
9.
Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80PubMed
10.
O’Brien PE, Skinner S (2000) Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1213–1216PubMed
11.
Coller JA (1987) Clinical application of anorectal manometry. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 16:17–33PubMed
12.
Sentovich SM, Wong WD, Blatchford GS (1998) Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1000–1004PubMed
13.
Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA (2003) Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 125:1320–1329CrossRefPubMed
14.
Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D, Stanton SL (1999) Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:318–323PubMed
15.
Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355:260–265PubMed
16.
Baxter NN, Bravo Guttierez A, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Madoff RD (2003) Long-term results of sphincteroplasty for acquired fecal incontinence (abstr). Dis Colon Rectum 46:A21–A22
17.
Gutierrez AB, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN (2004) Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 47:727–732CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Parks AG (1975) Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:683–687
20.
Deen KI, Oya M, Ortiz J, Keighley MB (1993) Randomized trial comparing three forms of pelvic floor repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 80:794–798PubMed
21.
Korsgen S, Deen KI, Keighley MR (1997) Long-term results of total pelvic floor repair for postobstetric fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 40:835–839PubMed
22.
Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT (1952) Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children. Ann Surg 135:853–862PubMed
23.
Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F et al (1991) Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 338:1163–1165CrossRefPubMed
24.
Williams NS, Patel J, George BD et al (1991) Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 338:1166–1169CrossRefPubMed
25.
Rongen MJGM, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, Konsten J, Baeten CGMI (2003) Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:716–721CrossRefPubMed
26.
Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG, LaFontaine LJ, Cavina E, Devesa M, Rouanet P, Christiansen J, Faucheron JL, Isbister W, Kohler L, Guelinckx PJ, Pahlman L (1999) Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 116:549–556PubMed
27.
Koch SM, Uludag O, Rongen M, Baeten CG, van Gemert W (2004) Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1711–1719CrossRefPubMed
28.
Penninckx F (2004) Belgian experience with dynamic graciloplasty for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:872–878CrossRefPubMed
29.
MSAC (2003) Placement of artificial bowel sphincters in the management of faecal incontinence. Assessment report. Medical Services Advisory Committee, Canberra
30.
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M (1987) Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 2(8553):244–245CrossRefPubMed
31.
Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, Denis P (2003) Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence. Ann Surg 237(1):52–56CrossRefPubMed
32.
Devesa JM, Rey A, Hervas PL, Halawa KS, Larranaga I, Svidler L, Abraira V, Muriel A (2002) Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1154–1163CrossRefPubMed
33.
Parker SC, Spencer MP, Madoff RD, Jensen LL, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA (2003) Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 46:722–729CrossRefPubMed
34.
Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE (2004) Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:665–672CrossRefPubMed
35.
Finlay IG, Richardson W, Hajivassiliou CA (2004) Outcome after implantation of a novel prosthetic anal sphincter in humans. Br J Surg 91:1485–1492CrossRefPubMed
36.
Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127PubMed
37.
Douglas JM, Smith LE (2001) Recent concepts in fecal incontinence. Curr Women’s Health Rep 1:67–71
38.
Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Arduini A, van den Hombergh U (2003) New percutaneous technique of sacral nerve stimulation has high initial success rate: preliminary results. Eur Urol 43:70–74CrossRefPubMed
39.
Ganio E, Realis A, Clerico G, Trompetto M (2001) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:619–628PubMed
40.
Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W (2004) Innovations in fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1720–1728CrossRefPubMed
41.
Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, Belmonte C, Barreto C, Velasco L (2003) Extended two-year results of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of fecal incontinence (the Secca procedure). Dis Colon Rectum 46:711–715CrossRefPubMed
42.
Efron JE, Corman ML, Fleshman J, Barnett J, Nagle D, Birnbaum E, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Sligh S, Rabine J, Wexner SD (2003) Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1606–1618PubMed
43.
Tuteja AK, Rao SSC (2004) Review article: recent trends in diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19:829–840CrossRefPubMed
44.
Davis K, Kumar D, Poloniecki J (2003) Preliminary evaluation of an injectable anal sphincter bulking agent (Durasphere) in the management of faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:237–243CrossRefPubMed
45.
Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J (2004) Perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence: preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1982–1989CrossRefPubMed
46.
Shafik A (1991) Puborectoplasty: new technique for the repair of fecal incontinence. Dig Surg 8:181–186
47.
Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K (2000) End-to-side pudendal nerve anastomosis for the creation of a new reinforcing anal sphincter in dogs. Surgery 127:92–98CrossRefPubMed
48.
Congilosi SM, Johnson DRE, Medot M et al (1997) Experimental model of pudendal nerve innervation of a skeletal muscle neosphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 84:1269–1273CrossRefPubMed
49.
Schrag HJ, Padilla FF, Goldschmidtboing F, Doll A, Woias P, Hopt UT (2004) German Artificial Sphincter System: first report of a novel and highly integrated sphincter prosthesis for therapy of major fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2215–2218CrossRefPubMed
50.
Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1218CrossRefPubMed
51.
Bardoel JW, Stadelmann WK, Perez-Abadia GA (2001) Dynamic rectus abdominis muscle sphincter for stoma continence: an acute functional study in a dog model. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:478–484CrossRefPubMed
52.
Altomare DF, Binda GA, Dodi G, La Torre F, Romano G, Rinaldi M, Melega E (2004) Disappointing long-term results of the artificial anal sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:1352–1353CrossRefPubMed
53.
Hill J, Hosker G, Kiff ES (2002) Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurement: what that do and do not tell us. Br J Surg 89:1268–1269CrossRefPubMed
54.
Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:735–760PubMed
55.
Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P et al (2002) Dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89
56.
Metadata
Title
Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options
Authors
Christophe Müller
Orlin Belyaev
Thomas Deska
Ansgar Chromik
Dirk Weyhe
Waldemar Uhl
Publication date
01-11-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0566-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2005 Go to the issue

Original Article

Insufficiency risk of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total abdominal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

Original Article

Effect of increasing cardiac preload, sympathetic antagonism, or vasodilation on visceral blood flow during pneumoperitoneum

Original Article

Fibrinolytic capacity in peritoneal fluid after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection: data from a randomized controlled trial

Original Article

Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma

Mastery in Surgery

Professor Louis Francois Hollender

Current Concepts in Clinical Surgery

The Nissen fundoplication: indication, technical aspects and postoperative outcome