Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Original Article

Interchangeability between two breath-by-breath O2 uptake calculation algorithms in asthmatic and healthy volunteers

Authors: Maria Pia Francescato, Mario Canciani, Valentina Cettolo

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The interchangeability analysis has been recently proposed to objectively assess whether a newly developed measurement tool can substitute the older ones; this analysis assumes that the measures yielded by the compared tools should differ less than a maximum acceptable value. We aimed to assess the interchangeability rate (IR) of the breath-by-breath O2 uptake data calculated with the “Independent breath” (IND) and the “Expiration-only” (EXP) algorithms.

Methods

Oxygen, carbon dioxide fractions, and ventilatory flow were recorded continuously over 26 min in 18 asthmatic and 20 well-matched healthy volunteers at rest, during cycling, and recovery; oxygen uptake (V’O2) was calculated with the two algorithms under comparison. Coefficients of variation (CVs) of all the steady-state condition were modeled as a function of the average V’O2 values and IR was calculated accordingly.

Results

CVs were significantly greater in the asthmatic volunteers (F = 5.97, p < 0.05), being lower for IND compared to EXP (F > 7.04, p < 0.02). CVs decreased as a function of the reciprocal of the square root of the average V’O2. The IR, calculated on the basis of this relationship, was not significantly different in the two groups of volunteers (F = 0.77, p = 0.385); taking as reference method the IND, or EXP algorithms, the IR values were significantly different (F = 58.6, p < 0.001), amounting to 97.4 ± 2.2% or to 98.2 ± 1.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

The relative noise of V’O2 was greater in the asthmatic volunteers compared to the healthy ones and was lower for IND compared to EXP. The interchangeability analysis suggested that IND might be a better substitute for EXP than the opposite.
Literature
go back to reference Bates D, Watts D (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Bates D, Watts D (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRef
go back to reference Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Metadata
Title
Interchangeability between two breath-by-breath O2 uptake calculation algorithms in asthmatic and healthy volunteers
Authors
Maria Pia Francescato
Mario Canciani
Valentina Cettolo
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04374-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

European Journal of Applied Physiology 6/2020 Go to the issue