Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Original Article

Contraction level, but not force direction or wrist position, affects the spatial distribution of motor unit recruitment in the biceps brachii muscle

Authors: Daniele Borzelli, Marco Gazzoni, Alberto Botter, Laura Gastaldi, Andrea d’Avella, Taian M. Vieira

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Different motor units (MUs) in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle have been shown to be preferentially recruited during either elbow flexion or supination. Whether these different units reside within different regions is an open issue. In this study, we tested wheter MUs recruited during submaximal isometric tasks of elbow flexion and supination for two contraction levels and with the wrist fixed at two different angles are spatially localized in different BB portions.

Methods

The MUs’ firing instants were extracted by decomposing high-density surface electromyograms (EMG), detected from the BB muscle of 12 subjects with a grid of electrodes (4 rows along the BB longitudinal axis, 16 columns medio-laterally). The firing instants were then used to trigger and average single-differential EMGs. The average rectified value was computed separately for each signal and the maximal value along each column in the grid was retained. The center of mass, defined as the weighted mean of the maximal, average rectified value across columns, was then consdiered to assess the medio-lateral changes in the MU surface representation between conditions.

Results

Contraction level, but neither wrist position nor force direction (flexion vs. supination), affected the spatial distribution of BB MUs. In particular, higher forces were associated with the recruitment of BB MUs whose action potentials were represented more medially.

Conclusion

Although the action potentials of BB MUs were represented locally across the muscle medio-lateral region, dicrimination between elbow flexion or supination seems unlikely from the surface representation of MUs action potentials.
Literature
go back to reference Riek S, Bawa P (1992) Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. J Neurophysiol 68(1):100–108CrossRef Riek S, Bawa P (1992) Recruitment of motor units in human forearm extensors. J Neurophysiol 68(1):100–108CrossRef
go back to reference Uellendahl J (2017) Myoelectric versus body-powered upper-limb prostheses: a clinical perspective. J Prosthet Orthot 29(4S):25–29CrossRef Uellendahl J (2017) Myoelectric versus body-powered upper-limb prostheses: a clinical perspective. J Prosthet Orthot 29(4S):25–29CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Contraction level, but not force direction or wrist position, affects the spatial distribution of motor unit recruitment in the biceps brachii muscle
Authors
Daniele Borzelli
Marco Gazzoni
Alberto Botter
Laura Gastaldi
Andrea d’Avella
Taian M. Vieira
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04324-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Journal of Applied Physiology 4/2020 Go to the issue