Top

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Published in:

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Original Article

Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants

Authors: Julia Kathrin Baumgart, Laura Gürtler, Gertjan Ettema, Øyvind Sandbakk

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 9/2018

Abstract

Purpose

To compare peak oxygen uptake (VO_2peak) and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling (UBP) and arm crank ergometry (ACE) in able-bodied (AB) and paraplegic participants (PARA).

Methods

Seven PARA and eleven AB upper-body trained participants performed four 5-min submaximal stages, and an incremental test to exhaustion in UBP and ACE. VO_2peak was the highest 30-s average during the incremental test. Metabolic rate (joule/second = watt) at fixed power outputs of 40, 60, and 80 W was estimated using linear regression analysis on the original power-output-metabolic-rate data and used to compare exercise efficiency between exercise modes and groups.

Results

VO_2peak did not significantly differ between UBP and ACE (p = 0.101), although peak power output was 19% lower in UBP (p < 0.001). Metabolic rate at fixed power outputs was 24% higher in UBP compared to ACE (p < 0.001), i.e., exercise efficiency was lower in UBP. PARA had 24% lower VO_2peak compared to AB (p = 0.010), although there were no significant differences in peak power output between PARA and AB (p = 0.209).

Conclusions

In upper-body-trained PARA and AB participants, VO_2peak did not differ between UBP and ACE, indicating that these two test modes tax the cardiovascular system similarly when the upper body is restricted. As such, the 19% lower peak power output in UBP compared to ACE may be explained by the coinciding lower efficiency.

Available only for authorised users

Arabi H, Vandewalle H, Pitor P, de Lattre J, Monod H (1997) Relationship between maximal oxygen uptake on different ergometers, lean arm volume and strength in paraplegic subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 76(2):122–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050223 CrossRefPubMed

Atkinson G, Reilly T (1996) Circadian variation in sports performance. Sports Med 21(4):292–312CrossRefPubMed

Bloemen MA, de Groot JF, Backx FJ, Westerveld RA, Takken T (2015) Arm cranking versus wheelchair propulsion for testing aerobic fitness in children with spina bifida who are wheelchair dependent. J Rehabil Med 47(5):432–437. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1944 CrossRefPubMed

Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14(5):377–381CrossRefPubMed

Drory Y, Ohry A, Brooks ME, Dolphin D, Kellermann JJ (1990) Arm crank ergometry in chronic spinal cord injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71(6):389–392PubMed

Ettema G, Loras HW (2009) Efficiency in cycling: a review. Eur J Appl Physiol 106(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1008-7 CrossRefPubMed

Gass GC, Camp EM (1984) The maximum physiological responses during incremental wheelchair and arm cranking exercise in male paraplegics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 16(4):355–359CrossRefPubMed

Gass EM, Harvey LA, Gass GC (1995) Maximal physiological responses during arm cranking and treadmill wheelchair propulsion in T4-T6 paraplegic men. Paraplegia 33(5):267–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1995.60 PubMedCrossRef

Gayle GW, Pohlman RL, Glaser RM, Davis GM (1990) Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to arm crank and wheelchair exercise using various handrims in male paraplegics. Res Q Exerc Sport 61(3):224–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1990.10608683 CrossRefPubMed

Glaser RM, Sawka MN, Brune MF, Wilde SW (1980) Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 48(6):1060–1064PubMed

Hegge AM, Bucher E, Ettema G, Faude O, Holmberg HC, Sandbakk O (2015) Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross-country skiers during whole-body, upper-body, and arm poling. Eur J Appl Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3281-y PubMedCrossRef

Hintzy F, Tordi N, Perrey S (2002) Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: a comparison. Int J Sports Med 23(6):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33734 CrossRefPubMed

Hopman MT, Oeseburg B, Binkhorst RA (1992) Cardiovascular responses in paraplegic subjects during arm exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 65(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed

Hopman MT, Verheijen PH, Binkhorst RA (1993) Volume changes in the legs of paraplegic subjects during arm exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985) 75(5):2079–2083. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.5.2079 CrossRef

Hopman MT, Houtman S, Groothuis JT, Folgering HT (2004) The effect of varied fractional inspired oxygen on arm exercise performance in spinal cord injury and able-bodied persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(2):319–323CrossRefPubMed

Leicht C, Perret C (2008) Comparison of blood lactate elimination in individuals with paraplegia and able-bodied individuals during active recovery from exhaustive exercise. J Spinal Cord Med 31(1):60–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2008.11753982 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Leicht CA, Tolfrey K, Lenton JP, Bishop NC, Goosey-Tolfrey VL (2013) The verification phase and reliability of physiological parameters in peak testing of elite wheelchair athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 113(2):337–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2441-6 CrossRefPubMed

Martel G, Noreau L, Jobin J (1991) Physiological responses to maximal exercise on arm cranking and wheelchair ergometer with paraplegics. Spinal Cord 29(7):447–456CrossRef

McCafferty WB, Horvath SM (1977) Specificity of exercise and specificity of training: a subcellular review. Res Q 48(2):358–371PubMed

Mossberg K, Willman C, Topor MA, Crook H, Patak S (1999) Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry. Spinal Cord 37(8):569–574CrossRefPubMed

Mukherjee G, Samanta A (2001) Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. J Rehabil Res Dev 38(4):391–399PubMed

Peronnet F, Massicotte D (1991) Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci 16(1):23–29PubMed

Price M, Campbell I (1999a) Thermoregulatory responses of spinal cord injured and able-bodied athletes to prolonged upper body exercise and recovery. Spinal Cord 37(11):772–779CrossRefPubMed

Price MJ, Campbell IG (1999b) Thermoregulatory and physiological responses of wheelchair athletes to prolonged arm crank and wheelchair exercise. Int J Sports Med 20(7):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-1999-8831 CrossRefPubMed

Price MJ, Bottoms L, Smith PM, Nicholettos A (2011) The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry. J Sports Sci 29(3):263–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.525520 CrossRefPubMed

Sawka MN (1986) Physiology of upper body exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 14:175–211CrossRefPubMed

Sawka MN, Glaser RM, Wilde SW, von Luhrte TC (1980) Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise. J Appl Physiol 49(5):784–788CrossRefPubMed

Smith PM, Price MJ, Doherty M (2001) The influence of crank rate on peak oxygen consumption during arm crank ergometry. J Sports Sci 19(12):955–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101317108453 CrossRefPubMed

Smith PM, Doherty M, Drake D, Price MJ (2004) The influence of step and ramp type protocols on the attainment of peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry. Int J Sports Med 25(8):616–621. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-817880 CrossRefPubMed

Smith PM, Amaral I, Doherty M, Price MJ, Jones AM (2006) The influence of ramp rate on VO₂peak and “excess” VO₂ during arm crank ergometry. Int J Sports Med 27(8):610–616. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865857 CrossRefPubMed

Smith PM, Doherty M, Price MJ (2007) The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry. J Sports Sci 25(6):711–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600831955 CrossRefPubMed

Taylor HL, Buskirk E, Henschel A (1955) Maximal oxygen intake as an objective measure of cardio-respiratory performance. J Appl Physiol 8(1):73–80CrossRefPubMed

Thijssen DH, Steendijk S, Hopman MT (2009) Blood redistribution during exercise in subjects with spinal cord injury and controls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(6):1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318196c902 CrossRefPubMed

Tropp H, Samuelsson K, Jorfeldt L (1997) Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry. Br J Sports Med 31(1):41–44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants
Authors: Julia Kathrin Baumgart
Laura Gürtler
Gertjan Ettema
Øyvind Sandbakk
Publication date: 01-09-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3912-1

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Overall and differentiated sensory responses to cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with cystic fibrosis: kinetics and ability to predict peak oxygen uptake

Impact of 60 days of 6° head down tilt bed rest on muscular oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics: efficacy of a reactive sledge jump countermeasure

Effect of circulatory system response to motor control in one-sided contractions

Vastus lateralis muscle tissue composition and motor unit properties in chronically endurance-trained vs. sedentary women

Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength

Change in maximal fat oxidation in response to different regimes of periodized high-intensity interval training (HIIT)