Top

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Original Article

The impact of repetition mechanics on the adaptations resulting from strength-, hypertrophy- and cluster-type resistance training

Authors: G. Nicholson, T. Ispoglou, A. Bissas

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 10/2016

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute and chronic training responses to strength-, hypertrophy- and cluster-type resistance training.

Methods

Thirty-four trained males were assigned to a strength [STR: 4 × 6 repetitions, 85 % of one repetition maximum, (1RM), 900 s total rest], hypertrophy (HYP: 5 × 10 repetitions, 70 % 1RM, 360 s total rest), cluster 1 (CL-1: 4 × 6/1 repetitions, 85 % 1RM, 1400 s total rest), and cluster 2 (CL-2: 4 × 6/1 repetitions, 90 % 1RM, 1400 s total rest) regimens which were performed twice weekly for a 6-week period. Measurements were taken before, during and following the four workouts to investigate the acute training stimulus, whilst similar measurements were employed to examine the training effects before and after the intervention.

Results

The improvements in 1RM strength were significantly greater for the STR (12.09 ± 2.75 %; p < 0.05, d = 1.106) and CL-2 (13.20 ± 2.18 %; p < 0.001, d = 0.816) regimens than the HYP regimen (8.13 ± 2.54 %, d = 0.453). In terms of the acute responses, the STR and CL-2 workouts resulted in greater time under tension (TUT) and impulse generation in individual repetitions than the HYP workout (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the STR (+3.65 ± 2.54 mmol/L⁻¹) and HYP (+6.02 ± 2.97 mmol/L⁻¹) workouts resulted in significantly greater elevations in blood lactate concentration (p < 0.001) than the CL-1 and CL-2 workouts.

Conclusion

CL regimens produced similar strength improvements to STR regimens even when volume load was elevated (CL-2). The effectiveness of the STR and CL-2 regimens underlines the importance of high loads and impulse generation for strength development.

Aagaard P, Simonsen E, Andersen J, Magnusson S, Halkjaer-Kristensen J, Dyhre-Poulsen P (2000) Neural inhibition during maximal eccentric and concentric quadriceps contraction: effects of resistance training. J App Physiol 89:2249–2257

Baechle T, Earle R (2008) Essentials of strength training and conditioning, 3rd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign

Behm D, Sale D (1993) Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Med 15:374–388CrossRefPubMed

Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sport Exer 14:S77–S381CrossRef

Burd NA, Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, Phillips SM (2012) Bigger weights may not beget bigger muscles: evidence from acute muscle protein synthetic responses after resistance exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Me 37:551–554CrossRef

Campos G, Luecke T, Wendeln H, Toma K, Hagerman F, Murray T, Ragg K, Ratamess N, Kraemer W, Staron R (2002) Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:50–60CrossRefPubMed

Carpinelli R (2008) The size principle and a critical analysis of the unsubstantiated heavier is better recommendation for resistance training. J Exerc Sci Fit 6:67–86

Chilibeck P, Calder A, Sale D, Webber C (1998) A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women. Eur J App Physiol O 77:170–175CrossRef

Cormie P, McGuigan M, Newton R (2010) Adaptations in athletic performance after ballistic power versus strength training. Med Sci Sport Exer 42:1582CrossRef

Coyle E, Feiring D, Rotkis T, Cote R, Roby F, Lee W, Wilmore J (1981) Specificity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. J App Physiol 51:1437–1442

Crewther B, Cronin J, Keogh J (2005) Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses. Sports Med 35:967–989CrossRefPubMed

Crewther B, Cronin J, Keogh J (2006) Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute metabolic responses. Sports Med 36:65–78CrossRefPubMed

De Luca CJ (1997) The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 13:135–163CrossRef

Denton J, Cronin JB (2006) Kinematic, kinetic and blood lactate profiles of continuous and intraset rest loading schemes. J Strength Cond Res 20:528–534PubMed

Folland J, Irish C, Roberts J, Tarr J, Jones D (2002) Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training. Brit J Sport Med 36:370–373CrossRef

Gordon T, Thomas C, Munson J, Stein R (2004) The resilience of the size principle in the organization of motor unit properties in normal and reinnervated adult skeletal muscles. Can J Physiol Pharm 82:645–661CrossRef

Goto K, Ishii T, Kizuka N, Takamatsu K (2005) The impact of metabolic stress on hormonal responses and muscular adaptations. Med Sci Sport Exer 37:955–963

Haff G, Whitley A, McCoy L, O’Bryant H, Kilgore J, Haff E, Pierce K, Stone M (2003) Effects of different set configurations on barbell velocity and displacement during a clean pull. J Strength Cond Res 17:95–103PubMed

Hakkinen K, Komi P, Alen M, Kauhanen H (1987) EMG, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during a 1 year training period in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:419–427CrossRef

Hansen K, Cronin J, Pickering S, Newton M (2011) Does cluster loading enhance lower body power development in preseason preparation of elite rugby union players? J Strength Cond Res 25:2118–2126CrossRefPubMed

Hardee J, Travis Triplett N, Utter A, Zwetsloot K, Mcbride J (2012) Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean. J Strength Cond Res 26:883–889CrossRefPubMed

Henneman E (1957) Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Sci 126:1345–1347CrossRef

Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C, Hagg G (1999) European recommendations for surface electromyography. Roessingh Res Dev 8:13–54

Houtman C, Stegeman J, Van Dijk J, Zwarts M (2003) Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations. J App Phyisol 95:1045–1054

Iglesias E, Boullosa D, Dopico X, Carballeira E (2010) Analysis of factors that influence the maximum number of repetitions in two upper-body resistance exercises: curl biceps and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 24:1566–1572CrossRefPubMed

Iglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Rodriguez D, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M (2015) Inter-repetition rest training and traditional set configuration produce similar strength gains without cortical adaptations. J Sport Sci 34:1473–1484CrossRef

Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Toji H, Suei K (1983) Training effect of different loads on the force-velocity relationship and mechanical power output in human muscle. Scand J Sport Sci 5:50–55

Komi P, Buskirk E (1972) Effect of eccentric and concentric muscle conditioning on tension and electrical activity of human muscle. Erg 15:417–434CrossRef

Kraemer W, Marchitelli L, Gordon S, Harman E, Dziados J, Mello R, Frykman P, McCurry D, Fleck S (1990) Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols. J App Physiol 69:1442–1450

Linnamo V, Newton R, Hakkinen K, Komi P, Davie A, McGuigan M, Triplett-McBride T (2000) Neuromuscular responses to explosive and heavy resistance loading. J Electro Kinesiol 10:417–424CrossRef

McDonagh M, Davies C (1984) Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol O 52:139–155CrossRef

Moore D, Burgomaster K, Schofield L, Gibala M, Sale D, Phillips S (2004) Neuromuscular adaptations in human muscle following low intensity resistance training with vascular occlusion. Eur J Appl Physiol 92:399–406CrossRefPubMed

Neils C, Udermann B, Brice G, Winchester J, McGuigan M (2005) Influence of contraction velocity inn untrained individuals over the initial early phase of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 19:883–887PubMed

Nicholson G, Bissas A (2015) The effect of knee joint angle on the reliability of the maximal isometric back squat. J Sport Sci 33:S61–S64CrossRef

Nicholson G, Mcloughlin G, Bissas A, Ispoglou T (2014) Do the acute biochemical and neuromuscular responses justify the classification of strength- and hypertrophy-type resistance exercise? J Strength Cond Res 28:3188–3199CrossRefPubMed

Oliver J, Jagim A, Sanchez A, Mardock M, Kelly K, Meredith H, Smith G, Greenwood M, Parker J, Riechman S, Fluckey J, Crouse S, Kreider R (2013) Greater gains in strength and power with intra-set rest intervals in hypertrophic training. J Strength Cond Res 27:3116–3131CrossRefPubMed

Pincivero D, Gear W, Moyna N, Robertson R (1999) The effects of rest interval on quadriceps torque and perceived exertion in healthy males. J Sport Med Phys Fit 39:294–299

Sakamaki M, Yasuda T, Abe T (2012) Comparison of low-intensity blood flow-restricted training-induced muscular hypertroph in eumenorrheic women in the follicular phase and luteal phase and age-matched men. Clin Physiol Func Imag 32:185–191CrossRef

Schoenfeld B (2010) The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 24:2857–2875CrossRefPubMed

Schuenke M, Herman J, Gliders R, Hagerman F, Hikida R, Rana S, Ragg K, Staron R (2012) Early-phase muscular adaptations in response to slow-speed versus traditional resistance-training regimens. Eur J Appl Physiol 112:3585–3595CrossRefPubMed

Takarada Y, Sato Y, Ishii N (2002) Effects of resistance exercise combined with vascular occlusion on muscle function in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:308–314CrossRefPubMed

West D, Kujbida G, Moore D, Atherton P, Burd N, Padzik J, De Lisio M, Tang J, Parise G, Rennie M, Baker S (2009) Resistance exercise-induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signalling in young men. J Physiol 587:5239–5247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yasuda T, Ogasawara R, Sakamaki M, Ozaki H, Sato Y, Abe T (2011) Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size. Eur J Appl Physiol 111:2525–2533CrossRefPubMed

Title: The impact of repetition mechanics on the adaptations resulting from strength-, hypertrophy- and cluster-type resistance training
Authors: G. Nicholson
T. Ispoglou
A. Bissas
Publication date: 01-10-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3439-2

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

The impact of repetition mechanics on the adaptations resulting from strength-, hypertrophy- and cluster-type resistance training

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

No evidence of neural adaptations following chronic unilateral isometric training of the intrinsic muscles of the hand: a randomized controlled study

1RM prediction: a novel methodology based on the force–velocity and load–velocity relationships

Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine responses to a 164-km road cycle ride in a hot environment

Low-volume high-intensity swim training is superior to high-volume low-intensity training in relation to insulin sensitivity and glucose control in inactive middle-aged women

High oxygen extraction and slow recovery of muscle deoxygenation kinetics after neuromuscular electrical stimulation in COPD patients

Post-exercise blood flow restriction attenuates muscle hypertrophy