Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Letter to the Editor

Response to Letter to the Editor: a counterweight is not necessary to implement simple, natural and comfortable single-leg cycle training

Authors: Keith J. Burns, James C. Martin, Steve J. Elmer, John McDaniel

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Dr. Dolmage and colleagues commented on a recent publication titled, “Cardiovascular responses to counterweighted single-leg cycling: implications for rehabilitation.” They assert that a counterweight is not required to facilitate natural single-leg cycling, rather a fixed gear ergometer can also accomplish the same goal. We agree with Dolmage and colleagues that a fixed gear ergometer can facilitate natural single-leg cycling with minimal deviation in the angular velocity of the crank if the kinetic energy of the flywheel is large. We also present some simple comparisons between the two modalities.
Metadata
Title
Response to Letter to the Editor: a counterweight is not necessary to implement simple, natural and comfortable single-leg cycle training
Authors
Keith J. Burns
James C. Martin
Steve J. Elmer
John McDaniel
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2965-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

European Journal of Applied Physiology 11/2014 Go to the issue