Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 1/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Article

Accuracy, reliability, linearity of Accutrend and Lactate Pro versus EBIO plus analyzer

Authors: Carlo Baldari, Valerio Bonavolontà, Gian Pietro Emerenziani, Maria Chiara Gallotta, Antonio José Silva, Laura Guidetti

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The accuracy, reliability and linearity in two hand-portable lactate analyzers, the Accutrend Lactate® (AL) and the Lactate Pro™ (LP) versus the EBIO® plus analyzer (EP) were evaluated. For accuracy, duplicate samples recorded on both the AL and LP revealed an overall average difference versus EP (P < 0.05). The limits of agreement between AL and EP were −0.7 to +1.0, and −1.3 to +1.5 mM between LP and EP. Reliability of AL and LP was assessed at different lactate concentrations; coefficient of variation ranged between 1.8 and 3.3% for AL and between 2.8 and 5.0% for LP. AL and LP had a good reliability for intra-, inter-analyzers, and between test strips (ICC r = 0.999). The linearity was determined versus the EP as reference. The slope coefficient of AL (1.0394) was closer to 1 than that of LP (1.1053). On these bases, AL and LP can be individually considered suitable for the sports research field.
Literature
go back to reference Baldari C, Videira M, Madeira F, Sergio J, Guidetti L (2004) Lactate removal during active recovery related to the individual anaerobic and ventilatory thresholds in soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol 93:224–230. doi:10.1007/s00421-004-1203-5 PubMedCrossRef Baldari C, Videira M, Madeira F, Sergio J, Guidetti L (2004) Lactate removal during active recovery related to the individual anaerobic and ventilatory thresholds in soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol 93:224–230. doi:10.​1007/​s00421-004-1203-5 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assess agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assess agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
go back to reference Goodwin ML, Harris JE, Hernandez A, Gladden LB (2007) Blood lactate measurements and analysis during exercise: a guide for clinicians. J Diabetes Sci Technol 1:558–569PubMed Goodwin ML, Harris JE, Hernandez A, Gladden LB (2007) Blood lactate measurements and analysis during exercise: a guide for clinicians. J Diabetes Sci Technol 1:558–569PubMed
go back to reference Mc Naughton LR, Thompson D, Philips G, Backx K, Crickmore L (2002) A comparison of the Lactate Pro, Accusport, Analox GM7 and Kodak Ektachem Lactate Analysers in normal, hot and humid conditions. Int J Sports Med 23:130–135. doi:10.1055/s-2002-20133 PubMedCrossRef Mc Naughton LR, Thompson D, Philips G, Backx K, Crickmore L (2002) A comparison of the Lactate Pro, Accusport, Analox GM7 and Kodak Ektachem Lactate Analysers in normal, hot and humid conditions. Int J Sports Med 23:130–135. doi:10.​1055/​s-2002-20133 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nordstrom L, Chua S, Roy A, Arulkumaran S (1998) Quality assessment of two lactate test strip methods suitable for obstetric use. J Perinat Med 26:83–88PubMedCrossRef Nordstrom L, Chua S, Roy A, Arulkumaran S (1998) Quality assessment of two lactate test strip methods suitable for obstetric use. J Perinat Med 26:83–88PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nordstrom L, Achanna S, Naka K, Arulkumaran S (2001) Fetal and maternal lactate increase during active second stage of labour. BJOG 108:263–268PubMedCrossRef Nordstrom L, Achanna S, Naka K, Arulkumaran S (2001) Fetal and maternal lactate increase during active second stage of labour. BJOG 108:263–268PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy, reliability, linearity of Accutrend and Lactate Pro versus EBIO plus analyzer
Authors
Carlo Baldari
Valerio Bonavolontà
Gian Pietro Emerenziani
Maria Chiara Gallotta
Antonio José Silva
Laura Guidetti
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1107-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

European Journal of Applied Physiology 1/2009 Go to the issue