Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology 3/2009

01-02-2009 | Original Article

Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing

Authors: Mako Fukano, Toru Fukubayashi

Published in: European Journal of Applied Physiology | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

This study determined sagittal plane motion of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) and lateral longitudinal arch (LLA) as well as the kinematics of the arch during landing. IRB-approved informed consent was obtained from 10 healthy male subjects (23.4 ± 3.4 years old) who performed single leg landings from a height of 10 cm with their knee extended. The subjects were then asked to stop and balance after each landing. Each trial was recorded using cineangiography. Images were obtained at a rate of 60 Hz using a radiation exposure equivalent to 200 mA (1 ms) with an intensity of 50 kV. Simultaneous ground reaction forces were measured using a force plate. The data were analyzed using a template method. Sagittal motion was defined as the change in the angle and the translational motion of the arch. A paired t test was performed to determine the differences in the measured values between the MLA and the LLA. The magnitude of the arch angle increased with time for 80–100 ms in all subjects. The magnitude of the arch angle for the LLA was significantly larger than that for the MLA. Regarding translational motion, the motion of the MLA was larger than that of the LLA. It was clear that each longitudinal arch had a different deformation pattern in absorbing the impact on landing. The MLA had a small angular change and a moderate degree of translational motion. Conversely, the motion of the LLA was mainly an angular change with a small translational motion.
Literature
go back to reference de Asla RJ, Wan L, Rubash HE, Li G (2006) Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique. J Orthop Res 24(5):1019–1027. doi:10.1002/jor.20142 PubMedCrossRef de Asla RJ, Wan L, Rubash HE, Li G (2006) Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique. J Orthop Res 24(5):1019–1027. doi:10.​1002/​jor.​20142 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng 122(6):630–639. doi:10.1115/1.1318904 PubMedCrossRef Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng 122(6):630–639. doi:10.​1115/​1.​1318904 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Guettler JH, Ruskan GJ, Bytomski JR, Brown CR, Richardson JK, Moorman CTIII (2006) Fifth metatarsal stress fractures in elite basketball players: evaluation of forces acting on the fifth metatarsal. Am J Orthop 35(11):532–536PubMed Guettler JH, Ruskan GJ, Bytomski JR, Brown CR, Richardson JK, Moorman CTIII (2006) Fifth metatarsal stress fractures in elite basketball players: evaluation of forces acting on the fifth metatarsal. Am J Orthop 35(11):532–536PubMed
go back to reference Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR (1999) The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 27(5):585–593PubMed Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR (1999) The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 27(5):585–593PubMed
go back to reference Kitaoka HB, Lundberg A, Luo ZP, An KN (1995) Kinematics of the normal arch of the foot and ankle under physiologic loading. Foot Ankle Int 16(8):492–499PubMed Kitaoka HB, Lundberg A, Luo ZP, An KN (1995) Kinematics of the normal arch of the foot and ankle under physiologic loading. Foot Ankle Int 16(8):492–499PubMed
go back to reference Maeda A, Shima N, Nishizono H, Kurata H, Higuchi S, Motohashi Y (2003) Lower extremity function in terms of shock absorption when landing with unsynchronized feet. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 22(6):279–283. doi:10.2114/jpa.22.279 PubMedCrossRef Maeda A, Shima N, Nishizono H, Kurata H, Higuchi S, Motohashi Y (2003) Lower extremity function in terms of shock absorption when landing with unsynchronized feet. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 22(6):279–283. doi:10.​2114/​jpa.​22.​279 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nester CJ, Liu AM, Ward E, Howard D, Cocheba J, Derrick T, et al (2006) In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model. J Biomech 40(9):1927–1937PubMedCrossRef Nester CJ, Liu AM, Ward E, Howard D, Cocheba J, Derrick T, et al (2006) In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model. J Biomech 40(9):1927–1937PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing
Authors
Mako Fukano
Toru Fukubayashi
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1439-6319
Electronic ISSN: 1439-6327
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0915-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

European Journal of Applied Physiology 3/2009 Go to the issue