Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 3/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Original Article

Consideration of psychosocial factors in workplace risk assessments: findings from a company survey in Germany

Authors: David Beck, Uwe Lenhardt

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Work-related psychosocial risks are an increasingly important issue in occupational safety and health (OSH) policy. In Germany, as in many other European countries, employers are legally required to carry out workplace risk assessments (WRAs) and to account for psychosocial factors when doing this. The aim of this study was to expand the still scarce and sketchy empirical evidence on the extent to which employers comply with these obligations, as well as on possible determinants of compliance behaviour.

Methods

Survey data from 6500 German companies were used to calculate the prevalence of workplace risk assessments that include psychosocial factors. Furthermore, multinomial logistic regressions were performed to explore which company characteristics influence the chance of psychosocial risk assessment occurrence.

Results

The prevalence of psychosocial risk assessments was 21%. Next to company size (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 3.0–11.0), availability of safety specialist assistance (OR = 3.5, 95% CI 2.6–4.6), availability of occupational health specialist assistance (OR = 3.4; 95% CI 2.6–4.4) and inspection by OSH authority (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 2.4–4.7) were the strongest predictors of psychosocial risk assessment occurrence. Smaller (but still significant) effect sizes were found for the level of knowledge about legal OSH requirements, training of managers in OSH, economic situation of the company, presence of a works council, positive view on the benefit of OSH, affiliation with the production sector and magnitude of psychosocial risks within the company.

Conclusions

The study results indicate large deficiencies in the implementation of psychosocial risk assessments, especially for small companies. Findings suggest that enhancing companies’ utilisation of professional OSH experts and strengthening the advisory and control capacities of the OSH inspection authorities in the area of psychosocial risks would be beneficial for improving the current situation.
Literature
Ahlers E (2017) Work and health in German companies. Findings from the WSI works councils survey 2015. In: Report No. 33e. WSI Institute of Economic and Social Research, Düsseldorf
Ahlers E, Brussig M (2005) Workplace risk assessments in company practice [in German]. WSI Mitt 58:517–523
Amaya A, Presser S (2017) Nonresponse bias for univariate and multivariate estimates of social activities and roles. Public Opin Q 81:1–36
Beck D, Richter G, Lenhardt U (2011) The significance of the topic “psychosocial stress” in labour inspectorates’ control and advisory activities [in German]. Sicher ist sicher 62:228–233
Beck D, Schuller K, Schulz-Dadaczynski A (2017) Psychosocial risk management in company practice. Opportunities and limitations [in German]. Präv Gesundheitsf 12:302–310CrossRef
Blair E, Zinkhan GM (2006) Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research. J Acad Mark Sci 34:4–7CrossRef
Champoux D, Brun JP (2003) Occupational health and safety management in small size enterprises: an overview of the situation and avenues for intervention and research. Saf Sci 41:301–318CrossRef
Colligan MJ, Cohen A (2004) The role of training in promoting workplace safety and health. In: Barling J, Frone MR (eds) The psychology of workplace safety. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 223–248CrossRef
Cox T, Griffiths A (2015) Assessment of potentially stressful work and organisational environments: theory and method. In: Wilson JR, Sharples S (eds) Evaluation of human work, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 565–582
Ellguth P, Kohaut S (2018) Collective bargaining and works councils: current findings from the IAB establishment panel 2017 [in German]. WSI Mitt 71:299–306CrossRef
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2012) Drivers and barriers for psychosocial risk management: an analysis of the findings of the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2014a) Calculating the cost of work-related stress and psychosocial risks. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2016) Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER-2). Overview report: managing safety and health at work. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2015) Third European Company Survey: workplace practices—patterns, performance and well-being. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2014) Psychosocial risks in Europe: prevalence and strategies for prevention. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Filer RK, Golbe DL (2003) Debt, operating margin, and investment in workplace safety. J Ind Econ 51:359–381CrossRef
Groves RM, Peytcheva E (2008) The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias. A meta-analysis. Public Opin Q 72:167–189CrossRef
Groves RM, Cialdini RB, Couper MP (1992) Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opin Q 56:475–495CrossRef
Groves RM, Presser S, Dipko S (2004) The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opin Q 68:2–31CrossRef
Hamacher W, Lenartz N, Riebe S et al (2013) Designing effective prevention—findings from the long-term study on occupational safety specialists [in German]. DGUV Report 3. German Statutory Accident Insurance, Berlin
Hämäläinen RM, Husman K, Räsänen K et al (2001) Survey of the quality and effectiveness of occupational health services in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. People and Work Research Report 45. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki
Hansen T, Lidsmoes LC, Laursen P et al (2015) Psychosocial working environment. Workplace inspection of the psychosocial working environment in the Nordic countries. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
Harber P, Rose S, Bontemps J et al (2010) Occupational medicine practice: activities and skills of a national sample. J Occup Environ Med 52:1147–1153CrossRef
Hasle P, Limborg HJ (2006) A review of the literature on preventive occupational health and safety activities in small enterprises. Ind Health 44:6–12CrossRef
Hasle P, Kines P, Andersen LP (2009) Small enterprises owners’ accident causation attribution and prevention. Saf Sci 47:9–19CrossRef
Health and Safety Executive (2007) Managing the causes of work-related stress: a step-by-step approach using the Management Standards, 2nd edn. HSE Books, Sudbury
Heggestad ED, Rogelberg S, Goh A et al (2015) Considering the effects of nonresponse on correlations between surveyed variables. A simulation study to provide context to evaluate survey results. J Pers Psychol 14:91–103CrossRef
Helbo Jespersen A, Hasle P et al (2016) The wicked character of psychosocial risks: implications for regulation. Nord J Work Life Stud 6(3):23–42CrossRef
Inspectie SZW, Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid (2014) Safety and health at the workplace 2012 [in Dutch]. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, The Hague
Janetzke H, Ertel M (2017) Psychosocial risk management in more and less favourable workplace conditions. Int J Workplace Health Manag 10:300–317CrossRef
Johnstone R (2016) The changing nature of work and the regulation of health and safety. In: Brodie D, Busby N, Zahn R (eds) The future regulation of work: new concepts, new paradigms. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp 82–104CrossRef
Kivimäki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD et al (2012) Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of inividual participant data. Lancet 380:1491–1497CrossRef
Ko K, Mendeloff J, Gray W (2010) The role of inspection sequence in compliance with the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) standards: interpretations and implications. Regul Gov 4:48–70CrossRef
Kompier MAJ (2006) New systems of work organization and workers’ health. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:421–430CrossRef
Korunka C, Kubicek B (eds) (2017) Job demands in a changing world of work. Springer, Cham
Langenhan MK, Leka S, Jain A (2013) Psychosocial risks: is risk management strategic enough in business and policy making? Saf Health Work 4:87–94CrossRef
Leitão S, Greiner BA (2017) Psychosocial, health promotion and safety culture management—are health and safety practitioners involved? Saf Sci 91:84–92CrossRef
Lenhardt U (2017) Psychosocial risks as an issue in company practice. Experiences and views of occupational safety and health consultants [in German]. Z Arb Wiss 71:6–13CrossRef
Mackay CJ, Cousins R, Kelly PJ et al (2004) ‘Management Standards’ and work-related stress in the UK: Policy background and science. Work Stress 18:91–112CrossRef
Madsen IEH, Nyberg ST, Magnusson Hanson LL et al (2017) Job strain as a risk factor for clinical depression: systematic review and meta-analysis with additional individual participant data. Psychol Med 47:1342–1356CrossRef
Masi D, Cagno E (2015) Barriers to OHS interventions in small and medium-sized enterprises. Saf Sci 71:226–241CrossRef
Mellor N, Mackay C, Packham C et al (2011) ‘Management Standards’ and work-related stress in Great Britain: progress on their implementation. Saf Sci 49:1040–1046CrossRef
Niskanen T, Kallio H, Naumanen P et al (2009) The effectiveness of risk assessment-related occupational safety and health provisions [in Finnish]. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki
Persechino B, Fontana L, Buresti G et al (2016) Professional activity, information demands, training and updating needs of occupational medicine physicians in Italy: national survey. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 29:837–858CrossRef
Pinder J, Gibb A, Dainty A et al (2016) Occupational safety and health and smaller organisations: research challenges and opportunities. Policy Pract Health Saf 14:34–49CrossRef
Popma JR (2009) Does worker participation improve health and safety? Findings from the Netherlands. Policy Pract Health Saf 7(1):33–51CrossRef
Rasmussen KB, Thimm H (2009) Fact-based understanding of business survey non-response. Electr J Bus Res Methods 7:83–92
Rasmussen MB, Hansen T, Nielsen KT (2011) New tools and strategies for the inspection of the psychosocial working environment: the experience of the Danish Working Environment Authority. Saf Sci 49:565–574CrossRef
Rindfuss RR, Choe MK, Tsuya NO et al (2015) Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan. Dem Res 32:797–828CrossRef
Sczesny C, Keindorf S, Droß PJ et al (2014) State of knowledge of entrepreneurs and employees in the area of occupational safety and health in small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) [in German]. Federal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Dortmund
Sleik K, Baier E, Künzel S et al (2015) Evaluation of the Joint German Occupational Safety and Health Strategy (GDA). In: Company and employee survey 2015. Methodological report [in German]. TNS Infratest Social Research, Munich
van Goor H, Verhage AL (1999) Nonresponse and recall errors in a study on absence because of illness: an analysis of their effects on distributions and relationships. Qual Quant 33:411–428CrossRef
van Stolk C, Staetsky L, Hassan E et al (2012) Management of occupational safety and health. An analysis of the findings of the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Walters D, Nichols T (2007) Worker representation and workplace health and safety. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRef
Walters D, Wadsworth E (2016a) Contexts and arrangements for occupational safety and health in micro and small enterprises in the EU—SESAME project. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Walters D, Wadsworth E (2016b) Worker participation in the management of OSH—qualitative evidence from ESENER 2. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Walters D, Johnstone R, Frick K et al (2011) Regulating workplace risks: a comparative study of inspection regimes in times of change. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRef
Weissbrodt R, Giauque D (2017) Labour inspections and the prevention of psychosocial risks at work: a realist synthesis. Saf Sci 100:110–124CrossRef
Zoni S, Lucchini RG (2012) European approaches to work-related stress: a critical review on risk evaluation. Saf Health Work 3:43–49CrossRef
Zwetsloot GIJM, van Scheppingen AR, Dijkman AJ et al (2010) The organizational benefits of investing in workplace health. Int J Workplace Health Manag 3:143–159CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Consideration of psychosocial factors in workplace risk assessments: findings from a company survey in Germany
Authors
David Beck
Uwe Lenhardt
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01416-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 3/2019 Go to the issue

Original Article

Sick leave before and after a work-place targeted terror attack

Original Article

Personal meaning of work and perceived work ability among middle-aged workers with physically strenuous work: a Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

Original Article

Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work

Original Article

Long-term exposure to heavy physical work, disability pension due to musculoskeletal disorders and all-cause mortality: 20-year follow-up—introducing Helsinki Health Study job exposure matrix

Original Article

Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing among women working in the aged care services in Japan

Original Article

Physical capacity, occupational physical demands, and relative physical strain of older employees in construction and healthcare