Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 6/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

What is return to work? An investigation into the quantification of return to work

Authors: Adam P. Vogel, Samantha J. Barker, Amanda E. Young, Rasa Ruseckaite, Alex Collie

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and demonstrate issues with return to work (RTW) outcome metrics in common use among clinical researchers and injury compensation organisations. We also aim to describe a framework on which to capture relevant RTW information including current employment status and data on participation and maintenance.

Methods

Structured telephone interviews discussing participant health and vocational status were conducted following compensable transport-related injury. Participants who were working at the time of injury and took time off work because of their injuries (N = 414) were asked questions relating to their work participation and maintenance, including length of continuous employment, hours worked and duties performed before and after injury. A series of RTW metrics was developed and applied to survey data. Rates of RTW according to each metric were calculated.

Results

Eighty-four per cent of participants had achieved some employment since their injury, and 74% were working at the time of the survey. In contrast, only 58% of participants were working the same hours as prior to their injury and had been doing so for at least 3 months. These data show that different impressions of rehabilitative success can be obtained depending on the criterion used to define RTW suggesting that reliance on a single RTW index (e.g. ‘are you currently working?’) will not represent important characteristics of employment.

Conclusion

A multi-layered approach to measuring RTW that includes data on reasons for not working, length of continuous employment, hours and duties performed after injury provides greater insight into the vocational status of injured individuals compared to single metrics or outcomes that fail to capture key detail on motives and participation. This information can assist clinicians to more accurately monitor the progress of rehabilitation following injury and compensation schemes to more effectively monitor their performance.
Literature
go back to reference Amick BCI, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN (2000) A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine 25(24):3152–3160CrossRef Amick BCI, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN (2000) A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine 25(24):3152–3160CrossRef
go back to reference Blonk R, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld S, Houtman I (2006) Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work & Stress 20:129–144CrossRef Blonk R, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld S, Houtman I (2006) Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work & Stress 20:129–144CrossRef
go back to reference Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm I, Koller AK, Riise R, Reikeras O (2003) Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28(17):1913–1921. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A CrossRef Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm I, Koller AK, Riise R, Reikeras O (2003) Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28(17):1913–1921. doi:10.​1097/​01.​BRS.​0000083234.​62751.​7A CrossRef
go back to reference Bültmann U, Franche R-L, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Lee H, Severin C, Vidmar M, Carnide N (2007) Health status, work limitations, and return-to-work trajectories in injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res 16(7):1167–1178CrossRef Bültmann U, Franche R-L, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Lee H, Severin C, Vidmar M, Carnide N (2007) Health status, work limitations, and return-to-work trajectories in injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res 16(7):1167–1178CrossRef
go back to reference Burton WN, Conti DJ (1999) The real measure of productivity. Bus Health 17:34–36 Burton WN, Conti DJ (1999) The real measure of productivity. Bus Health 17:34–36
go back to reference Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML (1995) Managing work disability: why first return to works is not a measure of success. Ind Labor Relat Rev 48(3):452–469CrossRef Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML (1995) Managing work disability: why first return to works is not a measure of success. Ind Labor Relat Rev 48(3):452–469CrossRef
go back to reference Casso G, Cachin C, van Melle G, Gerster J-C (2004) Return-to-work status 1 year after muscle reconditioning in chronic low back pain patients. Joint Bone Spine 71(2):136–139CrossRef Casso G, Cachin C, van Melle G, Gerster J-C (2004) Return-to-work status 1 year after muscle reconditioning in chronic low back pain patients. Joint Bone Spine 71(2):136–139CrossRef
go back to reference Fadyl J, McPherson K (2008) Return to Work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil 18(4):362–374CrossRef Fadyl J, McPherson K (2008) Return to Work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil 18(4):362–374CrossRef
go back to reference Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Williamson OD, Edwards ER, Graves SE, Richardson MD (2007) The relationship between compensable status and long-term patient outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. Med J Aust 187(1):14–17 Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Williamson OD, Edwards ER, Graves SE, Richardson MD (2007) The relationship between compensable status and long-term patient outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. Med J Aust 187(1):14–17
go back to reference Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F (1998) Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 8(2):113–139CrossRef Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F (1998) Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 8(2):113–139CrossRef
go back to reference Pantazis C, Gordon D, Levitas R (eds) (2006) Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: the millennium survey. The Policy Press, Bristol Pantazis C, Gordon D, Levitas R (eds) (2006) Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: the millennium survey. The Policy Press, Bristol
go back to reference Price C, Arden N, Coglan L, Rogers P (2005) Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. Health Technol Assess 9(33):1–58 Price C, Arden N, Coglan L, Rogers P (2005) Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. Health Technol Assess 9(33):1–58
go back to reference SafeWork Australia (2010) Comparison of work health and safety and workers’ compensation schemes in Australia and New Zealand (2010). Comparative performance monitoring report, 12th edn. Canberra, Australia SafeWork Australia (2010) Comparison of work health and safety and workers’ compensation schemes in Australia and New Zealand (2010). Comparative performance monitoring report, 12th edn. Canberra, Australia
go back to reference Smith A (1864) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. T. Nelson & Sons, London, p 1 Smith A (1864) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. T. Nelson & Sons, London, p 1
go back to reference Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B, Chassany O (2009) Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 25:929–942CrossRef Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B, Chassany O (2009) Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 25:929–942CrossRef
go back to reference Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25(20):2616–2621CrossRef Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25(20):2616–2621CrossRef
go back to reference van Velzen JM, de Groot S, Post MW, Slootman JH, van Bennekom CA, van der Woude LH (2009a) Return to work after spinal cord injury: is it related to wheelchair capacity at discharge from clinical rehabilitation? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88(1):47–56. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818e6140 CrossRef van Velzen JM, de Groot S, Post MW, Slootman JH, van Bennekom CA, van der Woude LH (2009a) Return to work after spinal cord injury: is it related to wheelchair capacity at discharge from clinical rehabilitation? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88(1):47–56. doi:10.​1097/​PHM.​0b013e31818e6140​ CrossRef
go back to reference van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CAM, Edelaar MJA, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2009b) How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review. Brain Inj 23(6):473–488. doi:10.1080/02699050902970737 CrossRef van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CAM, Edelaar MJA, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2009b) How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review. Brain Inj 23(6):473–488. doi:10.​1080/​0269905090297073​7 CrossRef
go back to reference Waddell G, Burton AK (2006) Is work good for your health and well-being?. Department for Work and Pensions, The Stationary Office, London Waddell G, Burton AK (2006) Is work good for your health and well-being?. Department for Work and Pensions, The Stationary Office, London
go back to reference Wasiak R, Young A, Roessler R, McPherson K, van Poppel M, Anema JR (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17(4):766–781CrossRef Wasiak R, Young A, Roessler R, McPherson K, van Poppel M, Anema JR (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17(4):766–781CrossRef
go back to reference Wilkinson R, Marmot MG (2003) Social determinants of health: the solid facts, 2nd edn. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen, Denmark Wilkinson R, Marmot MG (2003) Social determinants of health: the solid facts, 2nd edn. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen, Denmark
go back to reference Young A, Roessler R, Wasiak R, McPherson K, van Poppel M, Anema J (2005a) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):557–568CrossRef Young A, Roessler R, Wasiak R, McPherson K, van Poppel M, Anema J (2005a) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):557–568CrossRef
go back to reference Young A, Wasiak R, Roessler R, McPherson K, Anema J, van Poppel M (2005b) Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):543–556CrossRef Young A, Wasiak R, Roessler R, McPherson K, Anema J, van Poppel M (2005b) Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):543–556CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What is return to work? An investigation into the quantification of return to work
Authors
Adam P. Vogel
Samantha J. Barker
Amanda E. Young
Rasa Ruseckaite
Alex Collie
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0644-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 6/2011 Go to the issue