Top

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Published in:

01-11-2009 | Original Article

The psychometric properties of demand-control and effort–reward imbalance scales among Brazilian nurses

Authors: Rosane Härter Griep, Lucia Rotenberg, Ana Glória G. Vasconcellos, Paul Landsbergis, Cláudia M. Comaru, Márcia Guimarães M. Alves

Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Issue 10/2009

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the psychometric adequacy of the demand-control-support (DCS) and the effort–reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaires in relation to their respective theoretical models among workers within the same psychosocial work environment.

Methods

A self-report questionnaire was administered to 1,509 nursing personnel at two Brazilian hospitals. Analyses were based on internal consistency, corrected item-total correlation, and confirmatory factor analysis models for ordinal data (conducted with Mplus software) to test the fit of each model.

Results

Internal consistency was satisfactory (>0.70) for most scales of the DCS and ERI questionnaires, except for the job decision latitude scale (α = 0.50). With reference to corrected item-total correlations, adequate performance was observed for most items of both questionnaires. The item ‘Do you have to do same thing over and over again’ had a very low corrected item-total correlation (−0.09) and the removal of this item increased the internal consistency of the skill discretion subscale. Overall, fit indices (of factorial validity) for the DCS and the ERI questionnaires were adequate. However, a low correlation between subscales of the decision latitude scale (−0.164) was observed. For the psychological job demands and overcommitment scales, the best adjustment of the model was obtained when correlated errors between items were considered.

Conclusions

Strengths and limitations were observed in both the DCS and the ERI scales. The questionnaires could be improved by the revision of some items.

Alves MGM, Chor D, Faerstein E, Lopes C. de S, Werneck GL (2004) Short version of the ‘job stress scale’: a Portuguese-language adaptation. Rev Saúde Pública 38(2): 164–171

Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J, Marmot M (1998) Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 88:68–74CrossRef

Brown TA (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 1ª edn. The Guilford Press, New York, p 475

Buapetch A, Lagampan S, Faucett J, Kalampakorn S (2008) The Thai version of effort–reward imbalance questionnaire (Thai ERIQ): a study of psychometric properties in garment workers. J Occup Health 50(6):480–491CrossRef

Calnan M, Wadsworth E, May M, Smith A, Wainwright D (2004) Job strain, effort–reward imbalance, and stress at work: competing or complementary models? Scand J Public Health 32:84–93CrossRef

Choi B, Kawakami N, Chang S, Koh S, Bjorner J, Punnett L, Karasek R (2008) A cross-national study on the multidimensional characteristics of five-item psychological demands scale of the job content questionnaire. Int J Behav Med 15:120–132CrossRef

Chor D, Werneck GL, Faerstein E, Alves MGM, Rotenberg L (2008) The Brazilian version of the effort–reward imbalance questionnaire to assess job stress. Cad Saúde Pública 24(1):219–224CrossRef

de Araujo TM, Karasek R (2008) Validity and reliability of the job content questionnaire in formal and informal jobs in Brazil. SJWEH Suppl 6:52–59

de Jonge J, Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J (2000) Job strain, effort–reward imbalance and employee well being a large-scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med 50:1317–1327CrossRef

Griffin JM, Greiner BA, Stansfeld SA, Marmot M (2007) The effect of self-reported and observed job conditions on depression and anxiety symptoms: a comparison of theoretical models. J Occup Health Psychol 12(4):334–349CrossRef

Hanson E, Schaufeli W, Vrijkotte T, Plomp NH, Godaert GLR (2000) The validity and reliability of the Dutch effort–reward imbalance questionnaire. J Occup Health Psychol 5(1):142–155CrossRef

Johnson JV, Hall EM (1988) Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 78:1336–1342CrossRef

Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–307CrossRef

Karasek RA, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress. Productivity and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, New York

Karasek RA, Grodon G, Pietrokovsky C, Frese M, Pieper C, Schwartz J, Fry L, Schirer D (1985) Job content instrument: questionnaire and user’s guide Los Angeles/Lowell. University of Southern California/University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Karasek RA, Choi BK, Ostergren PO, Ferrario M, De Smet P (2007) Testing two methods to create comparable scale scores between the job content questionnaire (JCQ) and JCQ-Like questionnaires in the European JACE study. Int J Behav Med 14:189–201CrossRef

Landsbergis P, Theorell T (2000) Measurement of psychosocial workplace exposure variables. Occup Med: State of the Art Reviews 15:163–188

Li J, Yang W, Cheng Y, Siegrist J, Cho S-I (2005) Effort–reward imbalance at work and job dissatisfaction in Chinese healthcare workers: a validation study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:198–204CrossRef

Li J, Karasek R, Cho SI, Choi BK, Johnson JV, Ostry A, Landsbergis P (2008) Reliability, scale structure and findings from Chinese JCQ 2.0 study. ICOH Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors Conference Quebec, Canada September 2

Macías-Robles MD, Fernández-López JA, Hernández-Mejía R, Cueto-Espinar A, Rancaño I, Siegrist J (2003) Evaluación del estrés laboral en trabajadores de un hospital público español: estudio de las propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del modelo ‘Desequilibrio Esfuerzo-Recompensa’. Med Clin (Barc) 120(17):652–657

Magnavita N (2007) Two tools for health surveillance of job stress: the Karasek job content questionnaire and the Siegrist effort reward imbalance questionnaire. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29(3 Suppl):667–700

McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD (1995) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32:40–66CrossRef

Muthén BO (1993) Goodness of fit with categorical and other non-normal variables. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 205–243

Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2007) Mplus user’s guide, Fifth edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, p 682

Muthén BO, Toit SHC, Spisic D (1997) Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished technical report, pp 1–49. http://www.statmodel.com/wlscv.shtml. Assessed 24 March 2009

Niedhammer I, Siegrist J, Landre M, Goldberg M, Leclerc A (2000) Psychometric properties of French version of the effort–reward Imbalance model. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 48(5):419–437

Ostry A, Kelly S, Demers PA, Mustard C, Hertzman C (2003) A comparison between the effort–reward imbalance and demand control models. BMC Public Health 3:10–21CrossRef

Ota A, Masue T, Yasuda N, Tsutsumi A, Mino Y, Ohara H (2005) Association between psychosocial job characteristics and insomnia: an investigation using two relevant job stress models—the demand-control-support (DCS) model and the effort–reward imbalance (ERI) model. Sleep Med 6:353–358CrossRef

Sale JEM, Kerr MS (2002) The psychometric properties of Karasek’s demand and control scales within a single sector: data from a large teaching hospital. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:145–152CrossRef

Sanne B, Torp S, Mykletun A, Dahl AA (2005) The Swedish demand-control-support questionnaire (DCSQ): factor structure, item analyses, and internal consistency in a large population. Scand J Public Health 33:166–174CrossRef

Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high effort–low reward conditions at work. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–43CrossRef

Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58(8):1483–1499CrossRef

Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F (2009) A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, Nov. [Epub ahead of print]

Soderfeldt B, Soderfeldt M, Muntaner C, O′Campo P, Warg L-E, Ohlson C-G (1996) Psychosocial work environment in human service organizations: a conceptual analysis and development of the demand-control model. Soc Sci Med 42:1217–1226CrossRef

Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Theorell T, Perski A, Akerstedt T, Sigala F, AhlbergHulten G, Svensson J et al (1988) Changes in job strain in relation to changes in psychological state: a longitudinal study. Scand J Work Environ Health 14(3):189–196

Tsutsumi A, Iwata N, Wakita T, Kumagai R, Noguchi H, Kawakami N (2008) Improving the measurement accuracy of the effort–reward imbalance scales. Int J Behav Med 15:109–119CrossRef

Weyers S, Peter R, Boggild H, Jeppesen HJ, Siegrist J (2006) Psychosocial work stress is associated with poor self-rated health in Danish nurses: a test of the effort–reward imbalance model. Scand J Caring Sci 20:26–34CrossRef

Yang WJ, Li J (2004) Measurement of psychosocial factors in work environment: application of two models of occupational stress. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 22(6):422–426

Title: The psychometric properties of demand-control and effort–reward imbalance scales among Brazilian nurses
Authors: Rosane Härter Griep
Lucia Rotenberg
Ana Glória G. Vasconcellos
Paul Landsbergis
Cláudia M. Comaru
Márcia Guimarães M. Alves
Publication date: 01-11-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0460-3

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The psychometric properties of demand-control and effort–reward imbalance scales among Brazilian nurses

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Indoor environment in dwellings, asthma, allergies, and sick building syndrome in the Swedish population: a longitudinal cohort study from 1989 to 1997

Work characteristics and determinants of job satisfaction in four age groups: university employees’ point of view

Does sickness presenteeism have an impact on future general health?

Longitudinal study on potential neurotoxic effects of aluminium: II. Assessment of exposure and neurobehavioral performance of Al welders in the automobile industry over 4 years

Evaluation of different methods to determine total serum lipids for normalization of circulating organochlorine compounds

Sleep length and quality, sleepiness and urinary melatonin among healthy Danish nurses with shift work during work and leisure time