Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Guest Editorial

ICMJE criteria for authorship: why the criticisms are not justified?

Author: Mohammad Javed Ali

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

Authorship in scientific publications denotes creator of an original idea or a significant intellectual contributor and is a matter of pride as well as responsibility. There are no authorship guidelines that are set in stone. Still, several recommendations are available from global bodies (ICMJE, COPE) publishers or institutional guidelines (National Institute of Health [NIH], Harvard Medical School). The fundamental spirit of each of these bodies is to ensure ethics in scientific publications, promote due credit to deserving individuals, and discourage inappropriate authorship. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Moffat B (2013) Orphan papers and ghostwriting: the case against the ICMJE criterion of authorship. Account Res 20:59–71CrossRef Moffat B (2013) Orphan papers and ghostwriting: the case against the ICMJE criterion of authorship. Account Res 20:59–71CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abimbola SM (2013) Letter to the editor: orphan papers and ghostwriting: the case against the ICMJE. Account Res 20:285–286CrossRef Abimbola SM (2013) Letter to the editor: orphan papers and ghostwriting: the case against the ICMJE. Account Res 20:285–286CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Abbasi K (2012) End the farce; a new approach to authorship. J R Soc Med 105:361CrossRef Abbasi K (2012) End the farce; a new approach to authorship. J R Soc Med 105:361CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Patience GS, Galli F, Patience PA, Boffito DC (2019) Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One 14:e0198117CrossRef Patience GS, Galli F, Patience PA, Boffito DC (2019) Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One 14:e0198117CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ICMJE criteria for authorship: why the criticisms are not justified?
Author
Mohammad Javed Ali
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04825-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2021 Go to the issue