Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Retinal Detachment | Retinal Disorders

Anatomical and functional results of ILM peeling vs. non-peeling in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Authors: Keissy Sousa, Gil Calvão-Santos, Jorge Costa, Luís Ferreira, Luís Mendonça, Rita Gentil, Nuno Lourenço Gomes

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare anatomical and functional results between internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and non-ILM peeling in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods

We completed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) due to macula-off RRD. ILM peeling (P) versus non-ILM peeling (NP) groups were compared regarding best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomical success, endotamponade, concomitant scleral band placement and BCVA gain for epiretinal membranes (ERM) resubjected to PPV. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05.

Results

PPV was conducted in 352 patients, among which 43.5% (n = 153) were in the P group and 55.6% (n = 196) were in the NP group. Both groups had significant BCVA improvement during the study period (p < 0.001), but with no significant difference between them. Anatomical success was similar between P (84.2%) and NP (87.2%) groups. No difference was found with regard to endotamponade (p = 0.07) or concomitant scleral band placement (p = 0.43). The NP group developed subsequent ERM more frequently (p = 0.004), but BCVA gains for eyes requiring repeat PPV for ERM were not found (p = 0.14).

Conclusions

Although ERM formation and greater anatomical success are reasons to support the use of ILM peeling in RRD, we did not observe any anatomical or functional difference regarding ILM peeling or functional gain with secondary ERM peeling.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Thompson JA, Snead MP, Billington BM (2011) National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eye (Lond) 16(6):771–777CrossRef Thompson JA, Snead MP, Billington BM (2011) National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eye (Lond) 16(6):771–777CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Distefano L (2012) Epiretinal membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary pseudophakic or aphakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: incidence and outcomes. Retina 32(7):1350–1355CrossRef Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Distefano L (2012) Epiretinal membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary pseudophakic or aphakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: incidence and outcomes. Retina 32(7):1350–1355CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cox MS, Azen SP, Barr CC (1995) Macular pucker after successful surgery for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Silicone study report 8. Ophthalmology 102:1884–1891CrossRef Cox MS, Azen SP, Barr CC (1995) Macular pucker after successful surgery for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Silicone study report 8. Ophthalmology 102:1884–1891CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Council MD, Shah GK, Lee HC, Sharma S (2005) Visual outcomes and complications of epiretinal membrane removal secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 112:1218–1221CrossRef Council MD, Shah GK, Lee HC, Sharma S (2005) Visual outcomes and complications of epiretinal membrane removal secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 112:1218–1221CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Forlini M, Date P, Ferrari LM, Lorusso M, Lecce G, Verdina T, Neri G, Benatti C, Rossini P, Bratu A, D'Eliseo D, Ferrari TM, Cavallini GM (2018) Comparative analysis of retinal reattachment surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling to prevent postoperative macular pucker. Retina 38:1770–1776CrossRef Forlini M, Date P, Ferrari LM, Lorusso M, Lecce G, Verdina T, Neri G, Benatti C, Rossini P, Bratu A, D'Eliseo D, Ferrari TM, Cavallini GM (2018) Comparative analysis of retinal reattachment surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling to prevent postoperative macular pucker. Retina 38:1770–1776CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nam KY, Kim JY (2015) Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on the development of epiretinal membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 35:880–885CrossRef Nam KY, Kim JY (2015) Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on the development of epiretinal membrane after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 35:880–885CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Garweg JG, Deiss M, Pfister IB, Gerhardt C (2018) Impact of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual recovery after vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the fovea. Retina 0:1–7 Garweg JG, Deiss M, Pfister IB, Gerhardt C (2018) Impact of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual recovery after vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the fovea. Retina 0:1–7
10.
go back to reference Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be qualified with the Freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1236–1240CrossRef Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be qualified with the Freiburg visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(3):1236–1240CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chang JW, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Su YS (2014) Congenital Aniridia: long-term clinical course, visual outcome and prognostic factors. Korean J Ophthalmol 28(6):479–485CrossRef Chang JW, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Su YS (2014) Congenital Aniridia: long-term clinical course, visual outcome and prognostic factors. Korean J Ophthalmol 28(6):479–485CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, Pulvirenti A, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V, Castellino N, Cennamo G, Reibaldi M (2018) Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201010 Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, Pulvirenti A, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V, Castellino N, Cennamo G, Reibaldi M (2018) Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 13(7). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0201010
14.
go back to reference Hisatomi T, Tachibana T, Notomi S, Koyanagi Y, Murakami Y, Takeda A, Ikeda Y, Yoshida S, Enaida H, Murata T, Sakamoto T, Sonoda K-H, Ishibashi T (2017) Internal limiting membrane peeling-dependent retinal structural changes after vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 0:1–9 Hisatomi T, Tachibana T, Notomi S, Koyanagi Y, Murakami Y, Takeda A, Ikeda Y, Yoshida S, Enaida H, Murata T, Sakamoto T, Sonoda K-H, Ishibashi T (2017) Internal limiting membrane peeling-dependent retinal structural changes after vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 0:1–9
15.
go back to reference Yannuzzi NA, Callaway NF, Sridhar J, Smiddy WE (2018) Internal limiting membrane peeling during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 38:2081–2087CrossRef Yannuzzi NA, Callaway NF, Sridhar J, Smiddy WE (2018) Internal limiting membrane peeling during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 38:2081–2087CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR study): design issues and implications. SPR study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:657–674 Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR study): design issues and implications. SPR study report no. 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:657–674
20.
go back to reference Azen SP, Scott IU, Flynn HWJ, Lai MY, Topping TM, Benati L (1998) Silicon oil in the repair of complex retinal detachments. A prospective observational multicenter study Ophthalmology 105:1587–1597PubMed Azen SP, Scott IU, Flynn HWJ, Lai MY, Topping TM, Benati L (1998) Silicon oil in the repair of complex retinal detachments. A prospective observational multicenter study Ophthalmology 105:1587–1597PubMed
21.
go back to reference Katira RC, Zamani M, Berinstein DM, Garfinkel RA (2008) Incidence and characteristics of macular pucker formation after primary retinal detachment repair by pars plana vitrectomy alone. Retina 28:744–748CrossRef Katira RC, Zamani M, Berinstein DM, Garfinkel RA (2008) Incidence and characteristics of macular pucker formation after primary retinal detachment repair by pars plana vitrectomy alone. Retina 28:744–748CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anatomical and functional results of ILM peeling vs. non-peeling in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Authors
Keissy Sousa
Gil Calvão-Santos
Jorge Costa
Luís Ferreira
Luís Mendonça
Rita Gentil
Nuno Lourenço Gomes
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04775-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 10/2020 Go to the issue