Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Refractive Surgery

In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony

Authors: Alberto Domínguez-Vicent, Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada, Antonio J. Del Águila-Carrasco, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Robert Montés-Micó

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the optical quality between two intraocular lenses (IOLs): the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal (SIFI Medtech, Catania, Italy), and the TECNIS Symfony (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, USA), which both provide a continuous range of vision from far to near positions.

Methods

The in vitro optical quality of each lens was assessed with an instrument conceived for measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF). The optical quality of each lens was described in terms of MTF, through-focus MTF, defocus tolerance, pupil dependence, and Strehl ratio MTF. These metrics were assessed for the best lens far focus, and at four vergences (from −1.5 to −3.0 D in 0.5-D steps), at 3.0 and 4.5 mm apertures.

Results

The through-focus curves of each lens showed two main areas: one corresponding to far-distance vision, and another to intermediate- and near-distance vision. Both lenses showed similar MTF curves and Strehl ratio values at both apertures. The optical quality of both lenses slightly decreased with the aperture for all vergences. Nevertheless, the quality of the progressive multifocal lens increased with the aperture at far-distance vision. This lens also showed the largest defocus tolerance at near-distance vision for both apertures.

Conclusions

The results obtained in the present study suggest that both designs might enlarge the depth of focus. Whereas, the Mini WELL Ready showed better optical quality than the TECNIS Symfony at far vision with 4.5 mm aperture, and larger defocus tolerance than the diffractive lens at near-distance vision.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atkinson MJ, Tally S, Heichel CW, Kozak I, Leich J, Levack A (2013) A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function. Qual Life Res 22:437–453CrossRefPubMed Atkinson MJ, Tally S, Heichel CW, Kozak I, Leich J, Levack A (2013) A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function. Qual Life Res 22:437–453CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Maxwell WA, Cionni RJ, Lehmann RP, Modi SS (2009) Functional outcomes after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric acrylic intraocular lenses with a +3.0 or +4.0 diopter addition power randomized multicenter clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(12):2054–2061. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.06.041 CrossRefPubMed Maxwell WA, Cionni RJ, Lehmann RP, Modi SS (2009) Functional outcomes after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric acrylic intraocular lenses with a +3.0 or +4.0 diopter addition power randomized multicenter clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(12):2054–2061. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2009.​06.​041 CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garcia-Lazaro S, Montes-Mico R (2013) Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. J Refract Surg 29(11):749–754. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20131021-04 CrossRefPubMed Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garcia-Lazaro S, Montes-Mico R (2013) Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. J Refract Surg 29(11):749–754. doi:10.​3928/​1081597X-20131021-04 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carson D, Hill W, Hong X, Karakelle M (2014) Optical bench performance of AcrySof(®) IQ ReSTOR(®), AT LISA(®) tri, and FineVision(®) intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 8:2105–2113PubMedPubMedCentral Carson D, Hill W, Hong X, Karakelle M (2014) Optical bench performance of AcrySof(®) IQ ReSTOR(®), AT LISA(®) tri, and FineVision(®) intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 8:2105–2113PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Santhiago MR, Wilson SE, Netto MV, Ghanen RC, Monteiro ML, Bechara SJ, Espana EM, Mello GR, Kara N Jr (2012) Modulation transfer function and optical quality after bilateral implantation of a +3.00 D versus a +4.00 D multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(2):215–220. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.029 CrossRefPubMed Santhiago MR, Wilson SE, Netto MV, Ghanen RC, Monteiro ML, Bechara SJ, Espana EM, Mello GR, Kara N Jr (2012) Modulation transfer function and optical quality after bilateral implantation of a +3.00 D versus a +4.00 D multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(2):215–220. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2011.​08.​029 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G (2014) Comparison of two multifocal intraocular lens designs that differ only in near add. J Refract Surg 30:754–760CrossRefPubMed Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G (2014) Comparison of two multifocal intraocular lens designs that differ only in near add. J Refract Surg 30:754–760CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference International Organization for Standardization (2014) Part 2: optical propierties and test methods. In: ISO 11979: Ophthalmic impants – Intraocular lenses – Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–30 International Organization for Standardization (2014) Part 2: optical propierties and test methods. In: ISO 11979: Ophthalmic impants – Intraocular lenses – Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–30
13.
go back to reference Norrby N (1995) Standardized methods for assessing the imaging quality of intraocular lenses. Appl Opt 34:7327–7333CrossRefPubMed Norrby N (1995) Standardized methods for assessing the imaging quality of intraocular lenses. Appl Opt 34:7327–7333CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Thibos L, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA (2004) Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 4:329–351CrossRefPubMed Thibos L, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA (2004) Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 4:329–351CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Artigas JM, Menezo JL, Peris C, Felipe A, Diaz-Llopis M (2007) Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(12):2111–2117. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.035 CrossRefPubMed Artigas JM, Menezo JL, Peris C, Felipe A, Diaz-Llopis M (2007) Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(12):2111–2117. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2007.​07.​035 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference International Organization for Standardization (2006) Part 9: multifocal intraocular lenses. In: ISO 11979: Ophthalmic impants – Intraocular lenses – Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–20 International Organization for Standardization (2006) Part 9: multifocal intraocular lenses. In: ISO 11979: Ophthalmic impants – Intraocular lenses – Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–20
17.
go back to reference Felipe A, Pastor F, Artigas J, Diez-Ajenjo A, Gené A, Menezo J (2010) Correlation between optics quality of multifocal intraocular lenses and visual acuity. Tolerance to modulation transfer function decay. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:557–562CrossRefPubMed Felipe A, Pastor F, Artigas J, Diez-Ajenjo A, Gené A, Menezo J (2010) Correlation between optics quality of multifocal intraocular lenses and visual acuity. Tolerance to modulation transfer function decay. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:557–562CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Koch DD, Samuelson SW, Haft EA, Merin LM (1991) Pupillary size and responsiveness. Implications for selection of a Bifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 98:1030–1035CrossRefPubMed Koch DD, Samuelson SW, Haft EA, Merin LM (1991) Pupillary size and responsiveness. Implications for selection of a Bifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 98:1030–1035CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Venter J, Pelouskova M, Collins B, Schallhorn S, Hannan S (2013) Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1477–1484CrossRefPubMed Venter J, Pelouskova M, Collins B, Schallhorn S, Hannan S (2013) Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1477–1484CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Venter J, Pelouskova M, Bull C, Schallhorn S, Hannan S (2015) Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction with a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens for emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:585–593CrossRefPubMed Venter J, Pelouskova M, Bull C, Schallhorn S, Hannan S (2015) Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction with a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens for emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:585–593CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rosa A, Silva M, Lobo C, Mira J, Farinha C, voa Po J, Castelo-Branco M, Murta J (2013) Comparison of visual function after bilateral implantation of inferior sector-shaped near-addition and diffractive–refractive multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1653–1659CrossRefPubMed Rosa A, Silva M, Lobo C, Mira J, Farinha C, voa Po J, Castelo-Branco M, Murta J (2013) Comparison of visual function after bilateral implantation of inferior sector-shaped near-addition and diffractive–refractive multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1653–1659CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rabsilber TM, Rudalevicius P, Jasinskas V, Holzer M, Auffarth GU (2013) Influence of +3.00 D and +4.00 D near addition on functional outcomes of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens model. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:350–357CrossRefPubMed Rabsilber TM, Rudalevicius P, Jasinskas V, Holzer M, Auffarth GU (2013) Influence of +3.00 D and +4.00 D near addition on functional outcomes of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens model. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:350–357CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Venter J, Barclay D, Pelouskova M, Bull C (2014) Initial Experience With a New Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg 30:770–776CrossRefPubMed Venter J, Barclay D, Pelouskova M, Bull C (2014) Initial Experience With a New Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg 30:770–776CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Montés-Micó R, López-Gil N, Pérez-Vives C, Bonaque S, Ferrer-Blasco T (2012) In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive-diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: impact of tilt and decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(9):1657–1663. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.040 CrossRefPubMed Montés-Micó R, López-Gil N, Pérez-Vives C, Bonaque S, Ferrer-Blasco T (2012) In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive-diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: impact of tilt and decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(9):1657–1663. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2012.​03.​040 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A (2009) Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: Review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:172–181CrossRefPubMed Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A (2009) Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: Review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:172–181CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Pieh S, Fiala W, Malz A, Stork W (2009) In vitro Strehl ratios with spherical, aberration-free, average, and customized spherical aberration-correcting intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:1264–1270CrossRefPubMed Pieh S, Fiala W, Malz A, Stork W (2009) In vitro Strehl ratios with spherical, aberration-free, average, and customized spherical aberration-correcting intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:1264–1270CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Eppig T, Scholz K, Loffler A, Meßner A, Langenbucher A (2009) Effect of decentration and tilt on the image quality of aspheric intraocular lens designs in a model eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1091–1100CrossRefPubMed Eppig T, Scholz K, Loffler A, Meßner A, Langenbucher A (2009) Effect of decentration and tilt on the image quality of aspheric intraocular lens designs in a model eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1091–1100CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony
Authors
Alberto Domínguez-Vicent
Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada
Antonio J. Del Águila-Carrasco
Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Robert Montés-Micó
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3240-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2016 Go to the issue