Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Oculoplastics and Orbit

Association of rhinostomy shape and surgical outcome after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Authors: Joonsik Lee, Sung Won Yang, Hwa Lee, Minwook Chang, Minsoo Park, Sehyun Baek

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate surgical outcomes and complications after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) in relation to rhinostomy shape.

Methods

A retrospective electronic medical record review of patients who underwent EDCR for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) was performed. Surgical success rates and postoperative complications were compared among three groups of patients in relation to rhinostomy shape (alcove, cavern, or concealed cavern).

Results

A total of 280 patients (358 eyes) were included in the study. Of the 358 eyes, 194 rhinostomies were alcove-shaped, 157 were cavern-shaped, and 7 were concealed cavern-shaped. There were no patients with flat-shaped rhinostomies. The nasal cavity was wider in patients in the alcove group than those in the cavern and concealed cavern groups (p = 0.012). The mean time to tube removal was longest in the concealed cavern group (p = 0.029). There were no significant differences in anatomical success rates among the three groups (p = 0.338). With regard to functional success for patients with anatomically patent DCR, the cavern and concealed cavern groups had significantly poorer results than the alcove group (p = 0.001). Functional success rates were 91.6 %, 84.8 %, and 57.1 % for the alcove, cavern, and concealed cavern groups, respectively. Development of postoperative granuloma was more frequent in the concealed cavern group (85.7 %) than in the alcove (29.3 %) or cavern groups (26.1 %) (p= 0.003). Multiple logistic regression models for surgical outcome showed that rates of functional failure after EDCR were influenced by patient age and rhinostomy shape (odds ratio 1.824, p = 0.045 for age; odds ratio = 9.605, p = 0.000 for rhinostomy shape) (Table 5).

Conclusions

The incidence rate of symptomatic epiphora after EDCR was approximately 12 %, and this result may have been associated with cavernous and concealed rhinostomy shapes. For patients with persistent epiphora and anatomically patent DCR, it is important to identify rhinostomy shape by endoscopy in order to differentiate causes of functional failure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P (1993) Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 7(Pt 4):545–549CrossRefPubMed Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P (1993) Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 7(Pt 4):545–549CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Allen K, Berlin AJ (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg 20:486–489PubMed Allen K, Berlin AJ (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg 20:486–489PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rosen N, Sharir M, Moverman DC, Rosner M (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 253 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 20:115–119PubMed Rosen N, Sharir M, Moverman DC, Rosner M (1989) Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 253 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 20:115–119PubMed
5.
go back to reference Fayet B, Racy E, Assouline M (2004) Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 111:837–845CrossRef Fayet B, Racy E, Assouline M (2004) Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 111:837–845CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2005) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 112:1463–1468CrossRef Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2005) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 112:1463–1468CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ (2004) Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20:50–56CrossRefPubMed Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ (2004) Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20:50–56CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sham CL, van Hasselt CA (2000) Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope (LWW) 110:1045–1049CrossRef Sham CL, van Hasselt CA (2000) Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope (LWW) 110:1045–1049CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Apaydin KC, Fisenk F, Karayalcin B, Akar Y, Saka O (2004) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Ophthalmologica 218:306–311CrossRefPubMed Apaydin KC, Fisenk F, Karayalcin B, Akar Y, Saka O (2004) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Ophthalmologica 218:306–311CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tabatabaie SZ, Heirati A, Rajabi MT, Kasaee A (2007) Silicone intubation with intraoperative mitomycin C for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults: a prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23:455–458CrossRef Tabatabaie SZ, Heirati A, Rajabi MT, Kasaee A (2007) Silicone intubation with intraoperative mitomycin C for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults: a prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23:455–458CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Selig YK, Biesman BS, Rebeiz EE (2000) Topical application of mitomycin-C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol 14:205–207CrossRefPubMed Selig YK, Biesman BS, Rebeiz EE (2000) Topical application of mitomycin-C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol 14:205–207CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Olver J (2002) Colour Atlas of Lacrimal Surgery. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, p 135 Olver J (2002) Colour Atlas of Lacrimal Surgery. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, p 135
13.
go back to reference Lee MJ, Khwarg SI, Choung HK, Kim N (2014) Associated factors of functional failure of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Can J Ophthalmol 49:40–44CrossRefPubMed Lee MJ, Khwarg SI, Choung HK, Kim N (2014) Associated factors of functional failure of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Can J Ophthalmol 49:40–44CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wu W, Yan W, MacCallum JK, Tu Y, Jiang AC, Yang Y, Xiao T, Li J, Wang Q, Qu J (2009) Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 116:116–122CrossRef Wu W, Yan W, MacCallum JK, Tu Y, Jiang AC, Yang Y, Xiao T, Li J, Wang Q, Qu J (2009) Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe. Ophthalmology (Elsevier) 116:116–122CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Berlucchi M, Castelnuovo P, Vincenzi A, Morra B, Pasquini E (2009) Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 266:839–845CrossRef Berlucchi M, Castelnuovo P, Vincenzi A, Morra B, Pasquini E (2009) Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 266:839–845CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Xu G, Chen HX, Wen WP, Shi JB, Li Y (2003) Clinical evaluation of local application of Merogel after endoscopic sinus surgery. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol 38:95–97 Xu G, Chen HX, Wen WP, Shi JB, Li Y (2003) Clinical evaluation of local application of Merogel after endoscopic sinus surgery. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol 38:95–97
18.
go back to reference Yazici B, Yazici Z (2003) Final nasolacrimal ostium after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 121(1):76–80CrossRefPubMed Yazici B, Yazici Z (2003) Final nasolacrimal ostium after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 121(1):76–80CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Zilelioğlu G, Uğurbaş SH, Anadolu Y, Akiner M, Aktürk T (1998) Adjunctive use of mitomycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 82(1):63–66CrossRefPubMed Zilelioğlu G, Uğurbaş SH, Anadolu Y, Akiner M, Aktürk T (1998) Adjunctive use of mitomycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 82(1):63–66CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ezra E, Restori M, Mannor GE, Rose GE (1998) Ultrasonic assessment of rhinostomy size following external dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 82(7):786–789PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ezra E, Restori M, Mannor GE, Rose GE (1998) Ultrasonic assessment of rhinostomy size following external dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 82(7):786–789PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rose GE (2004) The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 20:262–265CrossRef Rose GE (2004) The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 20:262–265CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Durrani OM, Fernando AI, Reuser TQ (2007) Use of a novel topical hemostatic sealant in lacrimal surgery: a prospective, comparative study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23:25–27CrossRef Durrani OM, Fernando AI, Reuser TQ (2007) Use of a novel topical hemostatic sealant in lacrimal surgery: a prospective, comparative study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 23:25–27CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320CrossRefPubMed Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH (2001) Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 22:306–320CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wang YP, Wang MC, Chen YC, Leu YS, Lin HC, Lee KS (2011) The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 74:16–21CrossRefPubMed Wang YP, Wang MC, Chen YC, Leu YS, Lin HC, Lee KS (2011) The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 74:16–21CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kim NJ, Kim JH, Hwang SW, Choung HK, Lee YJ, Khwarg SI (2007) Lacrimal silicone intubation for anatomically successful but functionally failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Korean J Ophthalmol 21:70–73PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kim NJ, Kim JH, Hwang SW, Choung HK, Lee YJ, Khwarg SI (2007) Lacrimal silicone intubation for anatomically successful but functionally failed external dacryocystorhinostomy. Korean J Ophthalmol 21:70–73PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Delaney YM, Khooshabeh R (2002) Fluorescein transit test time and symptomatic outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 18:281–284CrossRef Delaney YM, Khooshabeh R (2002) Fluorescein transit test time and symptomatic outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 18:281–284CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association of rhinostomy shape and surgical outcome after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy
Authors
Joonsik Lee
Sung Won Yang
Hwa Lee
Minwook Chang
Minsoo Park
Sehyun Baek
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2967-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2015 Go to the issue