Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Cornea

Aging and corneal layers: an in vivo corneal confocal microscopy study

Authors: Catia Gambato, Evelyn Longhin, Anton Giulio Catania, Daniela Lazzarini, Raffaele Parrozzani, Edoardo Midena

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe age-related changes of different corneal layers using a quantitative analysis of in vivo corneal confocal microscopy.

Design

Descriptive observational cross-sectional study.

Methods

A total of 108 healthy corneas of 108 subjects, distributed in four age categories, underwent in vivo corneal confocal microscopy. The effect of aging on the main features of corneal epithelium, sub-basal nerve plexus, stroma, and endothelium was investigated.

Results

Mean diameter of superficial epithelial cells increases with age (0.05 μm per year; p < 0.0001). Mean cell density of basal epithelium does not change with age (p = 0.37). The sub-basal nerve plexus fiber number, density, and the number of beadings do not statistically change with age (p = 0.14, p = 0.10 and p = 0.17, respectively). Keratocyte density significantly reduces with age in each stromal layer (p < 0.0001). Endothelial cell count decreases by 10.92 cells/mm2 per year (p < 0.0001). Endothelial polymegathism index and pleomorphism index do not change with age (p = 0.79 and p = 0.39, respectively).

Conclusions

Corneal confocal microscopy allows a non-invasive examination of the living cornea, analyzing the microstructure of each corneal layer. Aging significantly influences the corneal confocal microscopy parameters of individual corneal layers, except sub-basal nerve plexus and basal epithelium.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Niederer RL, McGhee CN (2010) Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 29:30–58PubMedCrossRef Niederer RL, McGhee CN (2010) Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 29:30–58PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Pritchard N, Edwards K, Shahidi AM et al (2011) Corneal markers of diabetic neuropathy. Ocul Surf 9:17–28PubMedCrossRef Pritchard N, Edwards K, Shahidi AM et al (2011) Corneal markers of diabetic neuropathy. Ocul Surf 9:17–28PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Kaufman HE et al (2006) Clinical corneal confocal microscopy. Surv Ophthalmol 51:482–500PubMedCrossRef Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Kaufman HE et al (2006) Clinical corneal confocal microscopy. Surv Ophthalmol 51:482–500PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guthoff RF, Zhivov A, Stachs O (2009) In vivo confocal microscopy, an inner vision of the cornea—a major review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:100–117CrossRef Guthoff RF, Zhivov A, Stachs O (2009) In vivo confocal microscopy, an inner vision of the cornea—a major review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:100–117CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Midena E, Gambato C, Miotto S et al (2007) Long-term effects on corneal keratocytes of mitomycin C during photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized contralateral eye confocal microscopy study. J Refract Surg 23:S1011–S1014PubMed Midena E, Gambato C, Miotto S et al (2007) Long-term effects on corneal keratocytes of mitomycin C during photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized contralateral eye confocal microscopy study. J Refract Surg 23:S1011–S1014PubMed
7.
go back to reference Leonardi A, Lazzarini D, Bortolotti M et al (2012) Corneal confocal microscopy in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 119:509–515PubMedCrossRef Leonardi A, Lazzarini D, Bortolotti M et al (2012) Corneal confocal microscopy in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology 119:509–515PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Midena E, Cortese M, Miotto S et al (2009) Confocal microscopy of corneal sub-basal nerve plexus: a quantitative and qualitative analysis in healthy and pathologic eyes. J Refract Surg 25:S125–S130PubMed Midena E, Cortese M, Miotto S et al (2009) Confocal microscopy of corneal sub-basal nerve plexus: a quantitative and qualitative analysis in healthy and pathologic eyes. J Refract Surg 25:S125–S130PubMed
9.
go back to reference Meijering E, Jacob M, Sarria JC et al (2004) Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytom A 58:167–176CrossRef Meijering E, Jacob M, Sarria JC et al (2004) Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytom A 58:167–176CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gambato C, Miotto S, Cortese M et al (2011) Mitomycin C-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia: a long-term safety study. Cornea 30:641–645PubMedCrossRef Gambato C, Miotto S, Cortese M et al (2011) Mitomycin C-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia: a long-term safety study. Cornea 30:641–645PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Midena E, Brugin E, Ghirlando A et al (2006) Corneal diabetic neuropathy: a confocal microscopy study. J Refract Surg 22:S1047–S1052PubMed Midena E, Brugin E, Ghirlando A et al (2006) Corneal diabetic neuropathy: a confocal microscopy study. J Refract Surg 22:S1047–S1052PubMed
12.
go back to reference Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW et al (2003) Keratocyte density in the human cornea after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 121:770–776PubMedCrossRef Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW et al (2003) Keratocyte density in the human cornea after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 121:770–776PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gambato C, Ghirlando A, Moretto E et al (2005) Mitomycin C modulation of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy in highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmology 112:208–218PubMedCrossRef Gambato C, Ghirlando A, Moretto E et al (2005) Mitomycin C modulation of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy in highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmology 112:208–218PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Armstrong RA (2013) Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 33:7–14PubMedCrossRef Armstrong RA (2013) Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 33:7–14PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Healy MJ, Rasbash J, Yang M (1988) Distribution-free estimation of age-related centiles. Ann Hum Biol 15:17–22PubMedCrossRef Healy MJ, Rasbash J, Yang M (1988) Distribution-free estimation of age-related centiles. Ann Hum Biol 15:17–22PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N (2001) Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea 20:374–384PubMedCrossRef Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N (2001) Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea 20:374–384PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Masters BR, Böhnke M (2001) Three-dimensional confocal microscopy of the human cornea in vivo. Ophthalmic Res 33:125–135PubMedCrossRef Masters BR, Böhnke M (2001) Three-dimensional confocal microscopy of the human cornea in vivo. Ophthalmic Res 33:125–135PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T et al (2007) Age-related differences in the normal human cornea: a laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy study. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1165–1169PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T et al (2007) Age-related differences in the normal human cornea: a laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy study. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1165–1169PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tsubota K, Yamada M, Naoi S (1991) Specular microscopic observation of human corneal epithelial abnormalities. Ophthalmology 98:184–191PubMedCrossRef Tsubota K, Yamada M, Naoi S (1991) Specular microscopic observation of human corneal epithelial abnormalities. Ophthalmology 98:184–191PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Patel DV, McGhee CN (2013) Quantitative analysis of in vivo confocal microscopy images: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 58:466–475PubMedCrossRef Patel DV, McGhee CN (2013) Quantitative analysis of in vivo confocal microscopy images: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 58:466–475PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Efron N, Perez-Gomez I, Mutalib HA et al (2001) Confocal microscopy of the normal human cornea. Contemp Lens Anterior Eye 24:16–24CrossRef Efron N, Perez-Gomez I, Mutalib HA et al (2001) Confocal microscopy of the normal human cornea. Contemp Lens Anterior Eye 24:16–24CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eckard A, Stave J, Guthoff RF (2006) In vivo investigations of the corneal epithelium with the confocal Rostock laser scanning microscope (RLSM). Cornea 25:127–131PubMedCrossRef Eckard A, Stave J, Guthoff RF (2006) In vivo investigations of the corneal epithelium with the confocal Rostock laser scanning microscope (RLSM). Cornea 25:127–131PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vanathi M, Tandon R, Sharma N et al (2003) In vivo slit scanning confocal microscopy of normal corneas in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 51:225–230PubMed Vanathi M, Tandon R, Sharma N et al (2003) In vivo slit scanning confocal microscopy of normal corneas in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 51:225–230PubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Erie JC, McLaren JW, Hodge DO et al (2005) The effect of age on the corneal subbasal nerve plexus. Cornea 24:705–709PubMedCrossRef Erie JC, McLaren JW, Hodge DO et al (2005) The effect of age on the corneal subbasal nerve plexus. Cornea 24:705–709PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Parissi M, Karanis G, Randjelovic S et al (2013) Standardized baseline human corneal subbasal nerve density for clinical investigations with laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7091–7102PubMedCrossRef Parissi M, Karanis G, Randjelovic S et al (2013) Standardized baseline human corneal subbasal nerve density for clinical investigations with laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7091–7102PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference The EN, Glenn A (2011) Fry award lecture 2010: ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci 88:661–683CrossRef The EN, Glenn A (2011) Fry award lecture 2010: ophthalmic markers of diabetic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci 88:661–683CrossRef
29.
go back to reference McLaren JW, Bourne WM, Patel SV (2010) Automated assessment of keratocyte density in stromal images from the ConfoScan 4 confocal microscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1918–1926PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McLaren JW, Bourne WM, Patel SV (2010) Automated assessment of keratocyte density in stromal images from the ConfoScan 4 confocal microscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1918–1926PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hollingsworth J, Perez-Gomez I, Mutalib HA et al (2001) A population study of the normal cornea using an in vivo, slit-scanning confocal microscope. Optom Vis Sci 78:706–711PubMedCrossRef Hollingsworth J, Perez-Gomez I, Mutalib HA et al (2001) A population study of the normal cornea using an in vivo, slit-scanning confocal microscope. Optom Vis Sci 78:706–711PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Berlau J, Becker HH, Stave J et al (2002) Depth and age-dependent distribution of keratocytes in healthy human corneas: a study using scanning-slit confocal microscopy in vivo. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:611–616PubMedCrossRef Berlau J, Becker HH, Stave J et al (2002) Depth and age-dependent distribution of keratocytes in healthy human corneas: a study using scanning-slit confocal microscopy in vivo. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:611–616PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mustonen RK, McDonald MB, Srivannaboon S et al (1998) Normal human corneal cell populations evaluated by in vivo scanning slit confocal microscopy. Cornea 17:485–492PubMedCrossRef Mustonen RK, McDonald MB, Srivannaboon S et al (1998) Normal human corneal cell populations evaluated by in vivo scanning slit confocal microscopy. Cornea 17:485–492PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hara M, Morishige N, Chikama T et al (2003) Comparison of confocal biomicroscopy and noncontact specular microscopy for evaluation of the corneal endothelium. Cornea 22:512–515PubMedCrossRef Hara M, Morishige N, Chikama T et al (2003) Comparison of confocal biomicroscopy and noncontact specular microscopy for evaluation of the corneal endothelium. Cornea 22:512–515PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Szaflik JP (2007) Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems. Cornea 26:438–445PubMedCrossRef Szaflik JP (2007) Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems. Cornea 26:438–445PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cavanagh HD, El-Agha MS, Petroll WM et al (2000) Specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy: diagnostic tools of the past quarter century. Cornea 19:712–722PubMedCrossRef Cavanagh HD, El-Agha MS, Petroll WM et al (2000) Specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy: diagnostic tools of the past quarter century. Cornea 19:712–722PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO (1997) Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a 10-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:779–782PubMed Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO (1997) Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a 10-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:779–782PubMed
37.
go back to reference Hollingsworth J, Perez-Gomez I, Mutalib HA et al (2001) A population study of the normal cornea using an in vivo, slit-scanning confocal microscope. Optom Vis Sci 78:706–711PubMedCrossRef Hollingsworth J, Perez-Gomez I, Mutalib HA et al (2001) A population study of the normal cornea using an in vivo, slit-scanning confocal microscope. Optom Vis Sci 78:706–711PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Aging and corneal layers: an in vivo corneal confocal microscopy study
Authors
Catia Gambato
Evelyn Longhin
Anton Giulio Catania
Daniela Lazzarini
Raffaele Parrozzani
Edoardo Midena
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2812-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2015 Go to the issue