Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Cornea

Evaluation of myopic corneal diameter with the Orbscan II Topography System

Authors: Yi Zha, Wangqiang Feng, Xiaohui Han, Jianqiu Cai

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To assess the myopic corneal diameter with Orbscan II Topography System (Bausch & Lomb, Orbtek Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA).

Methods

Four hundred sixty-two eyes of 231 myopic patients and 129 emmetropic eyes were measured with the Orbscan II system. Eyes were divided into four groups according to the spherical equivalent(SE) as follows: group 1 [emmetropic group, spherical equivalents between −0.50 D and +0.50 D (−0.50<SE ≤ +0.50)]; group 2 [low myopia group, spherical equivalent between −0.50 D and −3.00D (−3.00<SE ≤ −0.50)]; group 3 [median myopia group, spherical equivalent between −3.00 and −6.00D (−6.00<SE ≤ −3.00)]; and group 4 [high myopia group, spherical equivalents of −6.00D or less (≤−6.00)]. Manifest refraction results and the Orbscan II corneal topographic maps were reviewed retrospectively. Horizontal corneal diameters (white-to-white [WTW] distance) were measured with the Orbscan II system. Subjects in different groups were matched to be comparable in terms of spherical equivalents.

Results

The corneal diameter in all myopic eyes was 11.49 ± 0.36 mm. There were no significant differences between right and left eyes in the t-test for paired samples (t = -0.119, P = 0.906). Differences among four groups proved to be significant in the ANOVA (F = 4.487, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

This article provides a detailed description and analysis of Orbscan II corneal diameter of a normal myopic population. High degree of mirror image symmetry existed in myopic corneal diameter. Spherical equivalents made a difference in corneal diameter.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoffer KJ (2000) Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1233–1237PubMedCrossRef Hoffer KJ (2000) Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1233–1237PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Werner L, Izak AM, Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Trivedi RH, Schmidbauer JM (2004) Correlation between different measurements within the eye relative to phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1982–1988PubMedCrossRef Werner L, Izak AM, Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Trivedi RH, Schmidbauer JM (2004) Correlation between different measurements within the eye relative to phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1982–1988PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Seo JH, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH (2009) Effects of white-to-white diameter and anterior chamber depth on implantable collamer lens vault and visual outcome. J Refract Surg 25(8):730–738PubMedCrossRef Seo JH, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH (2009) Effects of white-to-white diameter and anterior chamber depth on implantable collamer lens vault and visual outcome. J Refract Surg 25(8):730–738PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kohnen T, Thomala MC, Cichocki M, Strenger A (2006) Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(11):1809–1813PubMedCrossRef Kohnen T, Thomala MC, Cichocki M, Strenger A (2006) Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(11):1809–1813PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K (2010) Relationship between ciliary sulcus diameter and anterior chamber diameter and corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(4):617–624PubMedCrossRef Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K (2010) Relationship between ciliary sulcus diameter and anterior chamber diameter and corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(4):617–624PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Müller A, Doughty MJ (2002) Assessments of corneal endothelial cell density in growing children and its relationship to horizontal corneal diameter. Optom Vis Sci 79(12):762–770PubMedCrossRef Müller A, Doughty MJ (2002) Assessments of corneal endothelial cell density in growing children and its relationship to horizontal corneal diameter. Optom Vis Sci 79(12):762–770PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Seet B, Wong TY, Tan DT, Saw SM, Balakrishnan V, Lee LK, Lim AS (2001) Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. Br J Ophthalmol 85(5):521–526PubMedCrossRef Seet B, Wong TY, Tan DT, Saw SM, Balakrishnan V, Lee LK, Lim AS (2001) Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. Br J Ophthalmol 85(5):521–526PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Edwards MH, Lam CS (2004) The epidemiology of myopia in Hong Kong. Ann Acad Med Singap 33(1):34–38PubMed Edwards MH, Lam CS (2004) The epidemiology of myopia in Hong Kong. Ann Acad Med Singap 33(1):34–38PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wang L, Auffarth GU (2002) White-to-white corneal diameter measurements using the Eyemetrics Program of the Orbscan topography system. Dev Ophthalmol 34:141–146PubMedCrossRef Wang L, Auffarth GU (2002) White-to-white corneal diameter measurements using the Eyemetrics Program of the Orbscan topography system. Dev Ophthalmol 34:141–146PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T (2004) Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 30(2):374–380PubMedCrossRef Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T (2004) Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 30(2):374–380PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khng C, Osher RH (2008) Evaluation of the relationship between corneal diameter and lens diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(3):475–479PubMedCrossRef Khng C, Osher RH (2008) Evaluation of the relationship between corneal diameter and lens diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(3):475–479PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Alfonso JF, Ferrer-Blasco T, González-Méijome JM, García-Manjarres M, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Montés-Micó R (2010) Pupil size, white-to-white corneal diameter, and anterior chamber depth in patients with myopia. J Refract Surg 26(11):891–898PubMedCrossRef Alfonso JF, Ferrer-Blasco T, González-Méijome JM, García-Manjarres M, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Montés-Micó R (2010) Pupil size, white-to-white corneal diameter, and anterior chamber depth in patients with myopia. J Refract Surg 26(11):891–898PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Srivannaboon S, Chotikavanich S (2005) Corneal characteristics in myopic patients. J Med Assoc Thail 88(9):1222–1227 Srivannaboon S, Chotikavanich S (2005) Corneal characteristics in myopic patients. J Med Assoc Thail 88(9):1222–1227
14.
go back to reference Wei RH, Lim L, Chan WK, Tan DT (2006) Evaluation of Orbscan II corneal topography in individuals with myopia. Ophthalmology 113(2):177–183PubMedCrossRef Wei RH, Lim L, Chan WK, Tan DT (2006) Evaluation of Orbscan II corneal topography in individuals with myopia. Ophthalmology 113(2):177–183PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Riordan-Eva P (2001) Anatomy & embryology of the eye. In: Vaughan D, Asbury T (eds) General ophthalmology. McGraw-Hill Lange, New York, pp 8-10 Riordan-Eva P (2001) Anatomy & embryology of the eye. In: Vaughan D, Asbury T (eds) General ophthalmology. McGraw-Hill Lange, New York, pp 8-10
16.
go back to reference Starck T, Hersh PS (2000) Corneal dysgenesis, dystrophies, and degenerations. In: Abelson MB, Albert DM, Azar DT (eds) Principles and practice of ophthalmology, 2nd ed. W B Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 695–696, 3618–3619 Starck T, Hersh PS (2000) Corneal dysgenesis, dystrophies, and degenerations. In: Abelson MB, Albert DM, Azar DT (eds) Principles and practice of ophthalmology, 2nd ed. W B Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 695–696, 3618–3619
17.
go back to reference Duke-Elder S, Wybar KC (1961) The cornea. In: Duke-Elder S (ed) System of ophthalmology. The anatomy of the visual system. Henry Kimpton, London, pp 92–94 Duke-Elder S, Wybar KC (1961) The cornea. In: Duke-Elder S (ed) System of ophthalmology. The anatomy of the visual system. Henry Kimpton, London, pp 92–94
18.
go back to reference Zhang H (2005) Eye anatomy. In: Fengming L (ed) Chinese ophthalmology. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, pp 89–90 Zhang H (2005) Eye anatomy. In: Fengming L (ed) Chinese ophthalmology. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, pp 89–90
19.
go back to reference Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A (2010) White-to-white corneal diameter in the Tehran Eye Study. Cornea 29(1):9–12PubMedCrossRef Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A (2010) White-to-white corneal diameter in the Tehran Eye Study. Cornea 29(1):9–12PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rüfer F, Schröder A, Erb C (2005) White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 24(3):259–261PubMedCrossRef Rüfer F, Schröder A, Erb C (2005) White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 24(3):259–261PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of myopic corneal diameter with the Orbscan II Topography System
Authors
Yi Zha
Wangqiang Feng
Xiaohui Han
Jianqiu Cai
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2069-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2013 Go to the issue