Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Cataract

Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation

Authors: Anna Voskresenskaya, Nadezhda Pozdeyeva, Nicolay Pashtaev, Yevgeniy Batkov, Valeriy Treushnicov, Valentin Cherednik

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) are designed to reduce dependence on eyeglasses after surgery, but they cannot provide full range of vision, and have a drop of visual acuity in the intermediate distance. This problem may be solved with a trifocal lens, which produces three useful focal points. This study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes, functional vision and spectacle independence in patients with trifocal diffractive IOLs.

Methods

Thirty-six eyes after implantation of diffractive intraocular lens MIOL-Record were evaluated. This IOL has a diffractive lens profile binary in phase and produces three useful foci. Outcome measures recorded 6 months postoperatively were uncorrected and distance-corrected (far, near, intermediate) visual acuities, contrast sensitivity (under photopic and mesopic condition), root-mean-square (RMS) of higher order aberrations (HOA), patients’ quality of life (visual function questionnaire VFQ-25, halos and glare presence, overall satisfaction), and spectacle independence.

Results

Postoperatively, monocularly, the uncorrected (UDVA) and the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were 0.74 ± 0.21 and 0.86 ± 0.23 respectively (P < 0.05). No differences were found between uncorrected (UNVA)—0.85 ± 0.13 and best distance-corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) 0.89 ± 0.12 (P > 0.05). The uncorrected (UIVA) and best distance-corrected acuities of intermediate vision (CIVA) at 50 cm were 0.58 ± 0.16 and 0.6 ± 0.2 respectively. The photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range. But under dim light conditions it was inferior at all spatial frequencies by more than 0.2 logarithmic units. The mean aberration values were: total HOA RMS—0.816 ± 0.362 μm, spherical aberration (SA)—0.207 ± 0.136 μm, coma—0.335 ± 0.206 μm. The percentage of patients achieving spectacle freedom was 94%. On the questionnaire, 25% of patient noted nighttime halos; glare difficulty was reported by 16.7% of patients, difficulties with night vision persisted in 22.3% of cases.

Conclusion

Diffractive trifocal intraocular lens MIOL-Record provided good uncorrected distance, intermediate and near vision, gave high rates of spectacle freedom and overall patient satisfaction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Begoña Baamonde M, Montés-Micó R (2007) Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1235–1243CrossRefPubMed Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Begoña Baamonde M, Montés-Micó R (2007) Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1235–1243CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bucci AF (2006) Asymmetric implantation of multifocal IOLs may improve visual comfort in patients with cataracts and presbyopia. EuroTimes 11(9):16 Bucci AF (2006) Asymmetric implantation of multifocal IOLs may improve visual comfort in patients with cataracts and presbyopia. EuroTimes 11(9):16
3.
go back to reference Petermeier K, Szurman P (2007) Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR. Ophthalmology 104(399–404):406–408 Petermeier K, Szurman P (2007) Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR. Ophthalmology 104(399–404):406–408
4.
go back to reference Goes FJ (2008) Visual results following implantation of a refractive and a diffractive multifocal IOL in the contralateral eye. J Refract Surg 24:300–305PubMed Goes FJ (2008) Visual results following implantation of a refractive and a diffractive multifocal IOL in the contralateral eye. J Refract Surg 24:300–305PubMed
5.
go back to reference Swanson GJ (1994) Diffractive trifocal intraocular lens design. Patent (US) №. 5344447 Swanson GJ (1994) Diffractive trifocal intraocular lens design. Patent (US) №. 5344447
6.
go back to reference Valle PJ, Oti JE, Canales VF, Cagigal MP (2005) Visual axial PSF of diffractive trifocal lenses. Optics Express 13:2782–2792CrossRefPubMed Valle PJ, Oti JE, Canales VF, Cagigal MP (2005) Visual axial PSF of diffractive trifocal lenses. Optics Express 13:2782–2792CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fedorov SN, Linnik LF, Treushnicov VM, Viktorova EA (1998) Polymer material for making an elastic intraocular lens and a lens based on said material. Patent (US) № 5725576 Fedorov SN, Linnik LF, Treushnicov VM, Viktorova EA (1998) Polymer material for making an elastic intraocular lens and a lens based on said material. Patent (US) № 5725576
8.
go back to reference Fedorov SN, Linnik LF, Treushnicov VM, Viktorova EA (1998) Method for making an elastic intraocular lens. Patent (US) № 5833890 Fedorov SN, Linnik LF, Treushnicov VM, Viktorova EA (1998) Method for making an elastic intraocular lens. Patent (US) № 5833890
9.
go back to reference Chylack LT Jr, Wolf JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Billimore MA, Bailey IL Jr, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 111:831–836PubMed Chylack LT Jr, Wolf JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Billimore MA, Bailey IL Jr, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 111:831–836PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ligabue EA, Giordano C (2007) Interpretation of aberrometry measurements in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 23:S996–S1004PubMed Ligabue EA, Giordano C (2007) Interpretation of aberrometry measurements in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 23:S996–S1004PubMed
13.
go back to reference Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Devgan U (ed) Premium Presbiopia—Correcting IOLs. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 115–125 Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Devgan U (ed) Premium Presbiopia—Correcting IOLs. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 115–125
14.
go back to reference Futhey JA (1990) Diffractive lens. Patent (US) № 4936666 Futhey JA (1990) Diffractive lens. Patent (US) № 4936666
15.
go back to reference Koronkevich VP, Lenkova GA, Iskakov IA, Fedorov SN (2002) Diffractive intraocular lens. Patent (RU) № 2000104268 Koronkevich VP, Lenkova GA, Iskakov IA, Fedorov SN (2002) Diffractive intraocular lens. Patent (RU) № 2000104268
16.
go back to reference Alio LA, Elkady B, Ortiz D, Bernabeu G (2008) Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:942–948CrossRefPubMed Alio LA, Elkady B, Ortiz D, Bernabeu G (2008) Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:942–948CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gierek-Ciaciura S, Cwalina L, Bednarski L, Mrukwa-Kominek E (2009) A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, doi:10.1007/s00417-009-1177-4 PubMed Gierek-Ciaciura S, Cwalina L, Bednarski L, Mrukwa-Kominek E (2009) A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, doi:10.​1007/​s00417-009-1177-4 PubMed
18.
go back to reference Maxwell WA, Cionni RJ, Lehmann RP, Modi SS (2009) Functional outcomes after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric acrylic intraocular lenses with a +3.0 or +4.0 diopter addition power. Randomized multicenter clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:2054–2061CrossRefPubMed Maxwell WA, Cionni RJ, Lehmann RP, Modi SS (2009) Functional outcomes after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric acrylic intraocular lenses with a +3.0 or +4.0 diopter addition power. Randomized multicenter clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:2054–2061CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Amhaz H, Montés-Micó R, Valcárcel B, Ferrer-Blasco T (2009) Visual function after implantation of an aspheric bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:885–892CrossRefPubMed Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Amhaz H, Montés-Micó R, Valcárcel B, Ferrer-Blasco T (2009) Visual function after implantation of an aspheric bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:885–892CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF (2009) Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:2062–2069CrossRefPubMed Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF (2009) Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:2062–2069CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Móntes-Micó R, España E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL (2004) Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses; mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 111:85–96CrossRefPubMed Móntes-Micó R, España E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL (2004) Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses; mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 111:85–96CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Zelichowska B, Rękas M, Stankiewicz A, Cerviño A, Montés-Micó R (2008) Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lens: optical and visual evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:2036–2042CrossRefPubMed Zelichowska B, Rękas M, Stankiewicz A, Cerviño A, Montés-Micó R (2008) Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lens: optical and visual evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:2036–2042CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tachtaev UV (2008) Contrast sensitivity and glare testing after bifocal diffractive IOL implantation. Ophthalmosurgery 1:53–58 Tachtaev UV (2008) Contrast sensitivity and glare testing after bifocal diffractive IOL implantation. Ophthalmosurgery 1:53–58
24.
go back to reference Van Nes FL, Bouman MA (1967) Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 57:401–406CrossRef Van Nes FL, Bouman MA (1967) Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 57:401–406CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hubel D (1988) Eye, Brain, and Vision. Henry Holt & Company, Inc., New York Hubel D (1988) Eye, Brain, and Vision. Henry Holt & Company, Inc., New York
26.
go back to reference Kaymak H, Fahle M, Ott G, Mester U (2008) Intraindividual comparison of the effect of training on visual performance with ReSTOR and Tecnis diffractive multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg 24:287–293PubMed Kaymak H, Fahle M, Ott G, Mester U (2008) Intraindividual comparison of the effect of training on visual performance with ReSTOR and Tecnis diffractive multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg 24:287–293PubMed
27.
go back to reference Matthews N, Liu Z, Qian N (2001) The effect of orientation learning on contrast sensitivity. Vision Res 41:463–471CrossRefPubMed Matthews N, Liu Z, Qian N (2001) The effect of orientation learning on contrast sensitivity. Vision Res 41:463–471CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Alio JA, Elkady B, Klonowski P (eds) AcriLISA with MICS. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 201–209 Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Alio JA, Elkady B, Klonowski P (eds) AcriLISA with MICS. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 201–209
29.
go back to reference Davison JA, Simpson MJ (2006) History and devolopment of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:849–858CrossRefPubMed Davison JA, Simpson MJ (2006) History and devolopment of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:849–858CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Weeber H (ed) Optical principles of multifocal IOLs. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 3–11CrossRef Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Weeber H (ed) Optical principles of multifocal IOLs. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 3–11CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hida WT, Motta AF, Kara-José JN, Costa H, Tokunaga C, Cordeiro LN, Gemperli D, Nakano CT (2008) Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of Tecnis ZM900 and Restor SN60D3 diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Arq Bras Oftalmol 71:778–792 Hida WT, Motta AF, Kara-José JN, Costa H, Tokunaga C, Cordeiro LN, Gemperli D, Nakano CT (2008) Comparison between OPD-Scan results and visual outcomes of Tecnis ZM900 and Restor SN60D3 diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Arq Bras Oftalmol 71:778–792
32.
go back to reference Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, Krist R, Pfeiffer N (1999) Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 106:1878–1886CrossRefPubMed Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, Krist R, Pfeiffer N (1999) Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 106:1878–1886CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, Zöhrer R, Sticker M, Weghaupt H, Fercher A, Scorpik C (2001) Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 85:816–821CrossRefPubMed Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, Zöhrer R, Sticker M, Weghaupt H, Fercher A, Scorpik C (2001) Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 85:816–821CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Oliveira F, Freitas LL, Meire LP, Tamaki C, Belfort R Jr (2006) Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832CrossRefPubMed Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Oliveira F, Freitas LL, Meire LP, Tamaki C, Belfort R Jr (2006) Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Rau M (ed) Male/female differences regarding patient satisfaction after implantation of maltifocal IOLs. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 165–170 Goes FJ (2008) Multifocal IOLs. In: Rau M (ed) Male/female differences regarding patient satisfaction after implantation of maltifocal IOLs. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, pp 165–170
36.
go back to reference Chiam PJ, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, Kasaby S (2006) ReStore intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1459–1463CrossRefPubMed Chiam PJ, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, Kasaby S (2006) ReStore intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1459–1463CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Woodward MA, Randleman BR, Stulting RD (2009) Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:992–997CrossRefPubMed Woodward MA, Randleman BR, Stulting RD (2009) Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:992–997CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation
Authors
Anna Voskresenskaya
Nadezhda Pozdeyeva
Nicolay Pashtaev
Yevgeniy Batkov
Valeriy Treushnicov
Valentin Cherednik
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1424-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2010 Go to the issue