Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Glaucoma

Glaucoma detection and evaluation through pattern recognition in standard automated perimetry data

Authors: Dariusz Wroblewski, Brian A. Francis, Vikas Chopra, A. Shahem Kawji, Peter Quiros, Laurie Dustin, R. Kemp Massengill

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Perimetry remains one of the main diagnostic tools in glaucoma, and it is usually used in conjunction with evaluation of the optic nerve. This study assesses the capability of automatic pattern recognition methods, and in particular the support vector machines (SVM), to provide a valid clinical diagnosis classification of glaucoma based solely upon perimetry data.

Methods

Over 2,200 patient records were reviewed to produce an annotated database of 2,017 eyes. Visual field (VF) data were obtained with HFA II perimeter using the 24-2 algorithm. Ancillary information included treated and untreated intraocular pressure, cup-to-disk ratio, age, sex, central corneal thickness and family history. Ophthalmic diagnosis and classification of visual fields were provided by a consensus of at least two glaucoma experts. The database includes normal eyes, cases of suspect glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucoma, and glaucoma with different levels of severity, as well as 189 eyes with neurologic or neuro-ophthalmologic defects. Support vector machines were trained to provide multi-level classifications into visual field and glaucoma diagnosis classes.

Results

Numerical validation indicates 70–90% expected agreement between multi-stage classifications provided by the automated system, using a hierarchy of SVM models, and glaucoma experts. Approximately 75% accuracy for the classification of glaucoma suspect and pre-perimetric glaucoma (which by definition do not exhibit glaucomatous defects) indicates the ability of the numerical model to discern subtle changes in the VF associated with early stages of glaucoma. The Glaucoma Likelihood Index provides a single number summary of classification results.

Conclusions

Automatic classification of perimetry data may be useful for glaucoma screening, staging and follow-up.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M (1992) Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 113:396–400PubMed Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M (1992) Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 113:396–400PubMed
2.
go back to reference Werner EB, Petrig B, Krupin T, Bishop KI (1989) Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1083–1089PubMed Werner EB, Petrig B, Krupin T, Bishop KI (1989) Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1083–1089PubMed
3.
go back to reference Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M (1984) Differential light threshold. Short and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102:704PubMed Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M (1984) Differential light threshold. Short and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102:704PubMed
5.
go back to reference Haykin S (1994) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan College Publishing Co, New York, pp 236–281 Haykin S (1994) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan College Publishing Co, New York, pp 236–281
6.
go back to reference Cristiani N, Shawe-Taylor J (2001) An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 93–121 Cristiani N, Shawe-Taylor J (2001) An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 93–121
7.
go back to reference Nabney I (2001) NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition. Springer-Verlag, London Berlin Heidelberg, pp 191–218 Nabney I (2001) NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition. Springer-Verlag, London Berlin Heidelberg, pp 191–218
9.
go back to reference Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, Chan K, Williams J, Lee T-W, Blumenthal E, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sejnowski T, Weinreb RN (2002) Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:162–169PubMed Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, Chan K, Williams J, Lee T-W, Blumenthal E, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sejnowski T, Weinreb RN (2002) Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:162–169PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Twomey JM, Smith AE (1999) Bias and variance of validation methods for function approximation neural networks under conditions of sparse data, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part C Appl Rev 28:417–430 Twomey JM, Smith AE (1999) Bias and variance of validation methods for function approximation neural networks under conditions of sparse data, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part C Appl Rev 28:417–430
12.
go back to reference Flammer J, Drance SM, Augustiny L, Funkhouser A (1985) Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:176–181PubMed Flammer J, Drance SM, Augustiny L, Funkhouser A (1985) Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:176–181PubMed
14.
go back to reference Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1987) A package for statistical analysis of visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:153–168 Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1987) A package for statistical analysis of visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49:153–168
15.
go back to reference Asman P, Heijl A (1992) Galucoma hemifield test. Arch Ophthalmol 110:812–819PubMed Asman P, Heijl A (1992) Galucoma hemifield test. Arch Ophthalmol 110:812–819PubMed
16.
go back to reference Anton A, Maquet JA, Mayo A, Tapia J, Pastor JC (1997) Value of logistic discriminant analysis for interpreting initial visual field defects. Ophthalmology 104(3):525–531PubMed Anton A, Maquet JA, Mayo A, Tapia J, Pastor JC (1997) Value of logistic discriminant analysis for interpreting initial visual field defects. Ophthalmology 104(3):525–531PubMed
17.
go back to reference Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, White H et al (1994) Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3362–3373PubMed Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, White H et al (1994) Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3362–3373PubMed
18.
go back to reference Brigatti L, Hoffman D, Caprioli J (1996) Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 121:511–521PubMed Brigatti L, Hoffman D, Caprioli J (1996) Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 121:511–521PubMed
19.
go back to reference Brigatti L, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Weitzman M, Caprioli J (1997) Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks. Arch Ophthalmol 115:725–728PubMed Brigatti L, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Weitzman M, Caprioli J (1997) Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks. Arch Ophthalmol 115:725–728PubMed
21.
go back to reference Zahlmann G, Scherf M, Wegner A, Obermaier M, Mertz M (2000) Situation assessment of glaucoma using a hybrid fuzzy neural network. IEEE Trans Eng Med Bio Mag 19:84–91. doi:10.1109/51.816247 CrossRef Zahlmann G, Scherf M, Wegner A, Obermaier M, Mertz M (2000) Situation assessment of glaucoma using a hybrid fuzzy neural network. IEEE Trans Eng Med Bio Mag 19:84–91. doi:10.​1109/​51.​816247 CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sample PA, Goldbaum MH, Chan K, Boden C, Lee T-W et al (2002) Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2660–2665PubMed Sample PA, Goldbaum MH, Chan K, Boden C, Lee T-W et al (2002) Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2660–2665PubMed
24.
go back to reference Brusini P (1996) Clinical use of a new method for visual field damage classification in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 6:402–407PubMed Brusini P (1996) Clinical use of a new method for visual field damage classification in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 6:402–407PubMed
Metadata
Title
Glaucoma detection and evaluation through pattern recognition in standard automated perimetry data
Authors
Dariusz Wroblewski
Brian A. Francis
Vikas Chopra
A. Shahem Kawji
Peter Quiros
Laurie Dustin
R. Kemp Massengill
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1121-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2009 Go to the issue