Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Basic Science

Performance analysis of new-generation vitreous cutters

Authors: Sophia Y. Fang, Charles M. T. DeBoer, Mark S. Humayun

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite their clinical advantages, smaller-diameter vitrectomy systems pose significant challenges in vitreous removal. The percentage of time the vitreous cutter port is open while cutting (duty cycle) is one of the primary factors that affect flow. Herein, we examine the effect of duty cycle on the flow performance of new-generation cutters relative to current instrumentation.

Methods

Performance of 25-gauge (ga) and 20-ga new-generation spring-return pneumatic cutters (n = 24 and n = 28 respectively) was analyzed relative to current-generation cutters, across their specified cut-speed range under clinical vacuum pressures of 500 mmHg (25-ga) and 200 mmHg (20-ga). A precision balance measured mass of water or porcine vitreous removed from a vial by a cutter; this was recorded in real-time and converted to flow rates. Frame-by-frame analysis of high-speed video was used to determine duty cycle. Data was analyzed using linear regression and the t-test.

Results

Compared with the current-generation, the new-generation cutters exhibit increasingly greater water flow rates at higher cut speeds (P < 0.001). Vitreous flow rates of the new-generation cutters are relatively constant as cut speed increases, and are significantly greater than those of the current-generation cutters at cut speeds of 1500 cuts per minute (CPM) or higher (P < 0.001). The new-generation 25-ga cutter exhibits greater vitreous flow rates at higher cut speeds than the current-generation 20-ga cutter: at 2000 and 2500 CPM, the new 25-ga cutter has 1.45 and 11.88 times the vitreous flow rate of the current 20-ga cutter (P < 0.001) respectively. Duty cycles of the new-generation cutters are significantly higher than those of the current-generation at all cut speeds (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although a number of factors influence flow, the high and relatively constant vitreous flow rates of the new-generation cutters are most likely due to their maintenance of high duty cycle as cut speed increases. The findings illustrate that in optimizing duty cycle, the vitreous flow efficiency of smaller-diameter cutters can match or exceed that of larger diameter cutters.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The Preferences and Trends Survey 2006. American Society of Retina Specialists website: http://​www.​asrs.​org/​.
 
2
Magalhaes et al. American Society of Retina Specialists-European VitreoRetinal Society Annual Meeting, Cannes, France, September 2006.
 
3
Magalhaes et al. American Society of Retina Specialists-European VitreoRetinal Society Annual Meeting, Cannes, France, September 2006.
 
4
Magalhaes et al. American Society of Retina Specialists-European VitreoRetinal Society Annual Meeting, Cannes, France, September 2006.
 
5
Magalhaes et al. American Society of Retina Specialists-European VitreoRetinal Society Annual Meeting, Cannes, France, September 2006.
 
6
Magalhaes et al. American Society of Retina Specialists-European VitreoRetinal Society Annual Meeting, Cannes, France, September 2006.
 
7
DeBoer et al. 2006 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology abstract #5254.
 
8
Magalhaes et al. American Society of Retina Specialists-European VitreoRetinal Society Annual Meeting, Cannes, France, September 2006.
 
9
It is important to note that at 2500 CPM, the current-generation 20-ga pneumatic cutter experiences incomplete port opening which may also affect flow rate.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fujii GY, de Juan E, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS, Awh C, Ng E, Barnes A, Wu SL, Sommerville DN (2002) A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1807–1812PubMedCrossRef Fujii GY, de Juan E, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS, Awh C, Ng E, Barnes A, Wu SL, Sommerville DN (2002) A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1807–1812PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fujii GY, de Juan E, Humayun MS, Chang TS, Pieramici DJ, Barnes A, Kent D (2002) Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1814–1820PubMedCrossRef Fujii GY, de Juan E, Humayun MS, Chang TS, Pieramici DJ, Barnes A, Kent D (2002) Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 109:1814–1820PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ (2003) Combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a series of 223 cases. Ophthalmology 110:1335–1339PubMedCrossRef Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ (2003) Combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a series of 223 cases. Ophthalmology 110:1335–1339PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E, Lim JI, Chong LP, Chang TS, Javaheri M, Fujii GY, Barnes AC, Alexandrou TJ (2005) Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 112:817–824PubMedCrossRef Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E, Lim JI, Chong LP, Chang TS, Javaheri M, Fujii GY, Barnes AC, Alexandrou TJ (2005) Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 112:817–824PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ibarra MS, Hermel M, Prenner JL, Hassan TS (2005) Longer-term outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 139:831–836PubMedCrossRef Ibarra MS, Hermel M, Prenner JL, Hassan TS (2005) Longer-term outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 139:831–836PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Oner S, Nohutcu AF (2006) 25-Gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:141–147PubMed Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Oner S, Nohutcu AF (2006) 25-Gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 16:141–147PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kellner L, Wimpissinger B, Stolba U, Brannath W, Binder S (2007) 25 Gauge versus 20 Gauge System for Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.106799 Kellner L, Wimpissinger B, Stolba U, Brannath W, Binder S (2007) 25 Gauge versus 20 Gauge System for Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.​1136/​bjo.​2006.​106799
8.
9.
go back to reference Hubschman JP (2005) Comparison of different vitrectomy systems (French). J Fr Ophthalmol 28:606–609CrossRef Hubschman JP (2005) Comparison of different vitrectomy systems (French). J Fr Ophthalmol 28:606–609CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y (2006) Surgical outcomes of 25-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for vitreoretinal diseases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35:175–180PubMed Oshima Y, Ohji M, Tano Y (2006) Surgical outcomes of 25-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery for vitreoretinal diseases. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35:175–180PubMed
11.
go back to reference Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM (1971) Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 75:813–820PubMed Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM (1971) Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 75:813–820PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bronner A, Nemeth-Wasmer G (1972) Vitreous body (French). Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol 32:593–602PubMed Bronner A, Nemeth-Wasmer G (1972) Vitreous body (French). Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol 32:593–602PubMed
Metadata
Title
Performance analysis of new-generation vitreous cutters
Authors
Sophia Y. Fang
Charles M. T. DeBoer
Mark S. Humayun
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0672-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2008 Go to the issue