Top

Journal of Neurology

Published in:

Open Access 25-02-2022 | Original Communication

Age-dependent perturbation of the perceptual and postural vertical by visual roll vection and susceptibility to motion sickness in children

Authors: Lutz Schnabel, Max Wuehr, Anna Huppert, Stanislav Bardins, Thomas Brandt, Doreen Huppert

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 11/2022

Abstract

Background

The visual contribution to the perceptual and postural vertical is mediated by a multisensory integration process and may relate to children’s susceptibility to motion sickness that is hypothesized to arise from intersensory conflicts.

Objective

To analyze the maturation of visual contribution to the perceptual and postural vertical in conjunction with the motion sickness susceptibility in childhood.

Methods

In 81 healthy children (aged 2–17 years; 57 females), adjustments of the subjective visual vertical and posturographically tested mediolateral displacements of body sway were measured during free upright stance and large-field visual motion stimulation in the roll plane (roll vection). Motion sickness susceptibility was assessed by taking the history of parents and children.

Results

Vection-induced tilts of the visual vertical showed a linear age-dependent decrease with largest tilts in the youngest (2–7 years; median of 20°) and smallest tilts in the oldest age group (13–17 years; median of 9–10°). Analogously, postural tilts as measured by mediolateral body sway were greatest in the youngest and smallest in the oldest age group. In contrast, motion sickness susceptibility was lowest in the youngest and highest in the oldest age group and exhibited an inverse correlation with vection-induced tilts of the visual vertical.

Conclusion

Roll vection-induced tilts of the visual and postural vertical exhibited a similar age-dependent course with the greatest effects in the youngest and the least effects in the oldest age group, the latter of which exhibited the highest susceptibility to motion sickness.

Dichgans J, Held R, Young LR, Brandt T (1972) Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity. Science 178:1217–1219. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4066.1217CrossRefPubMed

Dichgans J, Brandt T (1978) Visual-vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Perception. pp 755–804

Brandt T, Wenzel D, Dichgans J (1976) Visual stabilization of free stance in infants: a sign of maturity (author’s transl). Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970) 223:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367449CrossRef

Lee DN, Aronson E (1974) Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Percept Psychophys 15:529–532. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199297CrossRef

Butterworth G, Hicks L (1977) Visual proprioception and postural stability in infancy. A developmental study. Perception 6:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1068/p060255CrossRefPubMed

Stoffregen TA, Schmuckler MA, Gibson EJ (1987) Use of central and peripheral optical flow in stance and locomotion in young walkers. Perception 16:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1068/p160113CrossRefPubMed

Delorme A, Frigon JY, Lagace C (1989) Infants’ reactions to visual movement of the environment. Perception 18:667–673. https://doi.org/10.1068/p180667CrossRefPubMed

Baumberger B, Isableu B, Fluckiger M (2004) The visual control of stability in children and adults: postural readjustments in a ground optical flow. Exp Brain Res 159:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1930-1CrossRefPubMed

Gaertner C, Bucci MP, Obeid R, Wiener-Vacher S (2013) Subjective visual vertical and postural performance in healthy children. PLoS One 8:e79623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079623CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Bucci MP, Wiener-Vacher S, Trousson C, Baud O, Biran V (2015) Subjective visual vertical and postural capability in children born prematurely. PLoS One 10:e0121616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Brandt T, Bauer M, Benson J, Huppert D (2016) Motion sickness in ancient China. Neurology 87:331–335. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002871CrossRefPubMed

12.

Reason JT (1978) Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med 71:819–829CrossRef

13.

Zhang L-L, Wang J-Q, Qi R-R, Pan L-L, Li M, Cai Y-L (2016) Motion sickness: current knowledge and recent advance. CNS Neurosci Ther 22:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12468CrossRefPubMed

14.

Huppert D, Grill E, Brandt T (2019) Survey of motion sickness susceptibility in children and adolescents aged 3 months to 18 years. J Neurol 266:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09333-wCrossRefPubMed

15.

Henriques IF, Douglas de Oliveira DW, Oliveira-Ferreira F, Andrade PMO (2014) Motion sickness prevalence in school children. Eur J Pediatr 173:1473–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-014-2351-1CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dobie T, McBride D, Dobie T Jr, May J (2001) The effects of age and sex on susceptibility to motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 72:13–20PubMed

17.

Scharoun SM, Bryden PJ (2014) Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Toupet M, Van Nechel C, Grayeli AB (2016) Maturation of subjective visual vertical in children. Otol Neurotol 37:761–766. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001044CrossRefPubMed

19.

Dieterich M, Brandt T (1993) Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs. Ann Neurol 33:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330311CrossRefPubMed

20.

Dieterich M, Brandt T (2019) perception of verticality and vestibular disorders of balance and falls. Front Neurol 10:172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Foster EC, Sveistrup H, Woollacott MH (1996) Transitions in visual proprioception: a cross-sectional developmental study of the effect of visual flow on postural control. J Mot Behav 28:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1996.9941737CrossRefPubMed

22.

Higgins CI, Campos JJ, Kermoian R (1996) Effect of self-produced locomotion on infant postural compensation to optic flow. Dev Psychol 32:836–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.5.836CrossRef

23.

Money KE (1970) Motion sickness. Physiol Rev 50:1–39. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1970.50.1.1CrossRefPubMed

Title: Age-dependent perturbation of the perceptual and postural vertical by visual roll vection and susceptibility to motion sickness in children
Authors: Lutz Schnabel
Max Wuehr
Anna Huppert
Stanislav Bardins
Thomas Brandt
Doreen Huppert
Publication date: 25-02-2022
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Journal of Neurology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11017-x

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Age-dependent perturbation of the perceptual and postural vertical by visual roll vection and susceptibility to motion sickness in children

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Abuse and revictimization in adulthood in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study during pregnancy

Pioneers in neurology: Paul F.A. Hoefer (1903–1981)

Quality of life and mental health in the locked-in-state—differences between patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their next of kin

Combining vestibular rehabilitation with noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation for treatment of bilateral vestibulopathy

Attention impairment in motor functional neurological disorders: a neuropsychological study

Status epilepticus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Cologne, Germany: data from a retrospective, multicentre registry