Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 12/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Communication

Machine learning classifier to identify clinical and radiological features relevant to disability progression in multiple sclerosis

Authors: Silvia Tommasin, Sirio Cocozza, Alessandro Taloni, Costanza Giannì, Nikolaos Petsas, Giuseppe Pontillo, Maria Petracca, Serena Ruggieri, Laura De Giglio, Carlo Pozzilli, Arturo Brunetti, Patrizia Pantano

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy of a data-driven approach, such as machine learning classification, in predicting disability progression in MS.

Methods

We analyzed structural brain images of 163 subjects diagnosed with MS acquired at two different sites. Participants were followed up for 2–6 years, with disability progression defined according to the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) increment at follow-up. T2-weighted lesion load (T2LL), thalamic and cerebellar gray matter (GM) volumes, fractional anisotropy of the normal appearing white matter were calculated at baseline and included in supervised machine learning classifiers. Age, sex, phenotype, EDSS at baseline, therapy and time to follow-up period were also included. Classes were labeled as stable or progressed disability. Participants were randomly chosen from both sites to build a sample including 50% patients showing disability progression and 50% patients being stable. One-thousand machine learning classifiers were applied to the resulting sample, and after testing for overfitting, classifier confusion matrix, relative metrics and feature importance were evaluated.

Results

At follow-up, 36% of participants showed disability progression. The classifier with the highest resulting metrics had accuracy of 0.79, area under the true positive versus false positive rates curve of 0.81, sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.71. T2LL, thalamic volume, disability at baseline and administered therapy were identified as important features in predicting disability progression. Classifiers built on radiological features had higher accuracy than those built on clinical features.

Conclusions

Disability progression in MS may be predicted via machine learning classifiers, mostly evaluating neuroradiological features.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
32.
go back to reference Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245CrossRef Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Dwyer M, Brior D, Lyman C et al (2020) Artificial intelligence-based thalamic volumetry is fast, reliable, and generalizable to large, heterogeneous datasets using only clinical quality T2-FLAIR MRI (4846). Neurology 94:4846 Dwyer M, Brior D, Lyman C et al (2020) Artificial intelligence-based thalamic volumetry is fast, reliable, and generalizable to large, heterogeneous datasets using only clinical quality T2-FLAIR MRI (4846). Neurology 94:4846
44.
go back to reference Hart FM, Bainbridge J (2016) Current and emerging treatment of multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care 22:s159-170PubMed Hart FM, Bainbridge J (2016) Current and emerging treatment of multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care 22:s159-170PubMed
Metadata
Title
Machine learning classifier to identify clinical and radiological features relevant to disability progression in multiple sclerosis
Authors
Silvia Tommasin
Sirio Cocozza
Alessandro Taloni
Costanza Giannì
Nikolaos Petsas
Giuseppe Pontillo
Maria Petracca
Serena Ruggieri
Laura De Giglio
Carlo Pozzilli
Arturo Brunetti
Patrizia Pantano
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10605-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Journal of Neurology 12/2021 Go to the issue