Top

Published in:

01-05-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Communication

Volume loss in the deep gray matter and thalamic subnuclei: a longitudinal study on disability progression in multiple sclerosis

Authors: Stefano Magon, Charidimos Tsagkas, Laura Gaetano, Raihaan Patel, Yvonne Naegelin, Michael Amann, Katrin Parmar, Athina Papadopoulou, Jens Wuerfel, Christoph Stippich, Ludwig Kappos, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Till Sprenger

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 5/2020

Abstract

Background

Volume loss in the deep gray matter (DGM) has been reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) already at early stages of the disease and is thought to progress throughout the disease course.

Objective

To investigate the impact and predictive value of volume loss in DGM and thalamic subnuclei on disability worsening in patients MS over a 6-year follow-up period.

Methods

Hundred and seventy-nine patients with RRMS (132 women; median Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS: 2.5) and 50 with SPMS (27 women; median EDSS: 4.5) were included in the study. Patients underwent annual EDSS assessments and annual MRI at 1.5 T. DGM/thalamic subnuclei volumes were identified on high-resolution T1-weighted. A hierarchical linear mixed model for each anatomical DGM area and each thalamic subnucleus was performed to investigate the associations with disability scores. Cox regression was used to estimate the predictive properties of volume loss in DGM and thalamic subnuclei on disease worsening.

Results

In the whole sample and in RRMS, volumes of the thalamus and the striatum were associated with the EDSS; however, only thalamic volume loss was associated with EDSS change at follow-up. Regarding thalamic subnuclei, volume loss in the anterior nucleus, the pulvinar and the ventral anterior nucleus was associated with EDSS change in the whole cohort. A trend was observed for the ventral lateral nucleus. Volume loss in the anterior and ventral anterior nuclei was associated with EDSS change over time in patients with RRMS. Moreover, MS phenotype and annual rates of volume loss in the thalamus and ventral lateral nucleus were predictive of disability worsening.

Conclusion

These results highlight the relevance of volume loss in the thalamus as a key metric for predicting disability worsening as assessed by EDSS (in RRMS). Moreover, the volume loss in specific nuclei such as the ventral lateral nucleus seems to play a role in disability worsening.

Henry RG, Shieh M, Okuda DT et al (2008) Regional grey matter atrophy in clinically isolated syndromes at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:1236–1244. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.134825 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vercellino M, Masera S, Lorenzatti M et al (2009) Demyelination, inflammation, and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis deep gray matter. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 68:489–502. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181a19a5a CrossRefPubMed

Kolasinski J, Stagg CJ, Chance SA et al (2012) A combined post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative histological study of multiple sclerosis pathology. Brain 135:2938–2951. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws242 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Khalil M, Langkammer C, Pichler A et al (2015) Dynamics of brain iron levels in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal 3T MRI study. Neurology 84:2396–2402. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001679 CrossRefPubMed

Varga AW, Johnson G, Babb JS et al (2009) White matter hemodynamic abnormalities precede sub-cortical gray matter changes in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 282:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.036 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Magon S, Chakravarty M, Amann M et al (2014) Label-fusion-segmentation and deformation-based shape analysis of deep gray matter in multiple sclerosis: the impact of thalamic subnuclei on disability. Hum Brain Mapp 35:4193–4203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22470 CrossRefPubMed

Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Pagani E et al (2016) Structural MRI correlates of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1627–1644. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23125 CrossRefPubMed

Debernard L, Melzer TR, Alla S et al (2015) Deep grey matter MRI abnormalities and cognitive function in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 234:352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.10.004 CrossRef

Rocca MA, Mesaros S, Pagani E et al (2010) Thalamic damage and long-term progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 257:463–469. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100326 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Eshaghi A, Prados F, Brownlee WJ et al (2018) Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25145 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Azevedo CJ, Cen SY, Khadka S et al (2018) Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease. Ann Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25150 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Gaetano L, Häring DA, Radue E-W et al (2018) Fingolimod effect on gray matter, thalamus, and white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 90:e1324–e1332. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005292 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Bajrami A, Pitteri M, Castellaro M et al (2018) The effect of fingolimod on focal and diffuse grey matter damage in active MS patients. J Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8952-2 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Metzger CD, van der Werf YD, Walter M (2013) Functional mapping of thalamic nuclei and their integration into cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical loops via ultra-high resolution imaging-from animal anatomy to in vivo imaging in humans. Front Neurosci 7:24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00024 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121–127CrossRef

16.

Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452CrossRef

17.

Kappos L, D’Souza M, Lechner-Scott J, Lienert C (2015) On the origin of neurostatus. Mult Scler Relat Disord 4:182–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2015.04.001 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kalincik T, Cutter G, Spelman T et al (2015) Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138:3287–3298. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv258 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hirai T, Jones EG (1989) A new parcellation of the human thalamus on the basis of histochemical staining. Brain Res Rev 14:1–34CrossRef

20.

Chakravarty MM, Steadman P, van Eede MC et al (2013) Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates. Hum Brain Mapp 34:2635–2654. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22092 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Pipitone J, Park MTM, Winterburn J et al (2014) Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage 101:494–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.054 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Chakravarty MM, Bertrand G, Hodge CP et al (2006) The creation of a brain atlas for image guided neurosurgery using serial histological data. Neuroimage 30:359–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.041 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Chakravarty MM, Sadikot AF, Germann J et al (2008) Towards a validation of atlas warping techniques. Med Image Anal 12:713–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2008.04.003 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Chakravarty MM, Broadbent S, Rosa-Neto P et al (2009) Design, construction, and validation of an MRI-compatible vibrotactile stimulator intended for clinical use. J Neurosci Methods 184:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.07.018 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Magon S, May A, Stankewitz A et al (2015) Morphological abnormalities of thalamic subnuclei in migraine: a multicenter MRI study at 3 Tesla. J Neurosci 35:13800–13806. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2154-15.2015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Voineskos AN, Winterburn JL, Felsky D et al (2015) Hippocampal (subfield) volume and shape in relation to cognitive performance across the adult lifespan. Hum Brain Mapp 36:3020–3037. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22825 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA et al (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:1310–1320. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Manjón JV, Coupé P, Martí-Bonmatí L et al (2010) Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22003 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Studholme C, Novotny E, Zubal IG, Duncan JS (2001) Estimating tissue deformation between functional images induced by intracranial electrode implantation using anatomical MRI. Neuroimage 13:561–576. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0692 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Eskildsen SF, Coupé P, Fonov V et al (2012) BEaST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique. Neuroimage 59:2362–2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.012 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW et al (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1):S208–S219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Magon S, Gaetano L, Chakravarty MM et al (2014) White matter lesion filling improves the accuracy of cortical thickness measurements in multiple sclerosis patients: a longitudinal study. BMC Neurosci 15:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-106 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Sdika M, Pelletier D (2009) Nonrigid registration of multiple sclerosis brain images using lesion inpainting for morphometry or lesion mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 30:1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20566 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x CrossRef

35.

R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

36.

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRef

37.

Bergsland N, Horakova D, Dwyer MG et al (2012) Subcortical and cortical gray matter atrophy in a large sample of patients with clinically isolated syndrome and early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1573–1578. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3086 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ramasamy DP, Benedict RH, Cox JL et al (2009) Extent of cerebellum, subcortical and cortical atrophy in patients with MS: a case-control study. J Neurol Sci 282:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.034 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Houtchens MK, Benedict RH, Killiany R et al (2007) Thalamic atrophy and cognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 69:1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000276992.17011.b5 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Prinster A, Quarantelli M, Orefice G et al (2006) Grey matter loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage 29:859–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.034 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Khalil M, Teunissen C, Langkammer C (2011) Iron and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/606807 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Dziedzic T, Metz I, Dallenga T et al (2010) Wallerian degeneration: a major component of early axonal pathology in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol 20:976–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2010.00401.x CrossRefPubMed

43.

Henry RG, Shieh M, Amirbekian B et al (2009) Connecting white matter injury and thalamic atrophy in clinically isolated syndromes. J Neurol Sci 282:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.379 CrossRefPubMed

44.

McFarland NR, Haber SN (2002) Thalamic relay nuclei of the basal ganglia form both reciprocal and nonreciprocal cortical connections, linking multiple frontal cortical areas. J Neurosci 22:8117–8132CrossRef

45.

Asanuma C, Thach WT, Jones EG (1983) Distribution of cerebellar terminations and their relation to other afferent terminations in the ventral lateral thalamic region of the monkey. Brain Res 286:237–265CrossRef

46.

Gerfen CR, Bolam JP (2010) Chapter 1—the neuroanatomical organization of the basal ganglia. In: Heinz S, Kuei YT (eds) Handbook of behavioral neuroscience. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–28

47.

Bosch-Bouju C, Hyland BI, Parr-Brownlie LC (2013) Motor thalamus integration of cortical, cerebellar and basal ganglia information: implications for normal and parkinsonian conditions. Front Comput Neurosci 7:163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00163 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Middleton FA, Strick PL (2000) Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits. Brain Res Rev 31:236–250CrossRef

49.

Hoshi E, Tremblay L, Feger J et al (2005) The cerebellum communicates with the basal ganglia. Nat Neurosci 8:1491–1493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1544 CrossRefPubMed

50.

Zhang D, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS et al (2010) Noninvasive functional and structural connectivity mapping of the human thalamocortical system. Cereb Cortex 20:1187–1194. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp182 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich MW et al (2003) Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci 6:750–757. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1075 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Sunaert S et al (2004) Cerebellar and premotor function in bimanual coordination: parametric neural responses to spatiotemporal complexity and cycling frequency. Neuroimage 21:1416–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.011 CrossRefPubMed

53.

Guillery RW, Sherman SM (2002) The thalamus as a monitor of motor outputs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:1809–1821. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1171 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Shipp S (2003) The functional logic of cortico-pulvinar connections. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1605–1624. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1213 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Barron DS, Eickhoff SB, Clos M, Fox PT (2015) Human pulvinar functional organization and connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 36:2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22781 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Ishii A, Tanaka M, Watanabe Y (2016) The neural mechanisms of re-experiencing physical fatigue sensation: a magnetoencephalography study. Exp Brain Res 234:2433–2446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4648-y CrossRefPubMed

57.

Hagemeier J, Yeh EA, Brown MH et al (2013) Iron content of the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus is increased in adolescent multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 19:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458512459289 CrossRef

58.

Child ND, Benarroch EE (2013) Anterior nucleus of the thalamus functional organization and clinical implications. Neurology 81:1869–1876CrossRef

59.

Dupire A, Kant P, Mons N et al (2013) A role for anterior thalamic nuclei in affective cognition: interaction with environmental conditions. Hippocampus 23:392–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22098 CrossRefPubMed

60.

McKay KA, Tremlett H, Fisk JD et al (2018) Psychiatric comorbidity is associated with disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 90:e1316–e1323. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005302 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Tsagkas C, Magon S, Gaetano L et al (2018) Preferential spinal cord volume loss in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518775006 CrossRef

62.

Traynor CR, Barker GJ, Crum WR et al (2011) Segmentation of the thalamus in MRI based on T1 and T2. Neuroimage 56:939–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.083 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Volume loss in the deep gray matter and thalamic subnuclei: a longitudinal study on disability progression in multiple sclerosis
Authors: Stefano Magon
Charidimos Tsagkas
Laura Gaetano
Raihaan Patel
Yvonne Naegelin
Michael Amann
Katrin Parmar
Athina Papadopoulou
Jens Wuerfel
Christoph Stippich
Ludwig Kappos
M. Mallar Chakravarty
Till Sprenger
Publication date: 01-05-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multiple Sclerosis
Published in: Journal of Neurology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09740-4

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Volume loss in the deep gray matter and thalamic subnuclei: a longitudinal study on disability progression in multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Brain MRI of multiple system atrophy of cerebellar type: a prospective study with implications for diagnosis criteria

Utility of the Parkinson’s disease-Cognitive Rating Scale for the screening of global cognitive status in Huntington’s disease

Complications in cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: timing of the intervention

Minimally conscious state “plus”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery

The 2019 novel cornoavirus pneumonia with onset of oculomotor nerve palsy: a case study

Subjects at risk of Parkinson’s disease in health checkup examinees: cross-sectional analysis of baseline data of the NaT-PROBE study