Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Communication

Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients

Authors: F. Esposito, L. Ferrè, F. Clarelli, M. A. Rocca, G. Sferruzza, L. Storelli, M. Radaelli, F. Sangalli, L. Moiola, B. Colombo, F. Martinelli Boneschi, G. Comi, M. Filippi, V. Martinelli

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Treatment choice in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial for optimizing risk–benefit profile.

Objective

To assess fingolimod (FTY) effectiveness and identify baseline features associated to disease activity in a large Italian cohort of Relapsing–Remitting (RR) MS patients.

Methods

Three-hundred sixty-seven RRMS patients starting FTY treatment at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan-Italy) underwent clinical and MRI evaluations for 2 years. Treatment response was assessed considering the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) and recording the time to first relapse. Primary analyses were performed stratifying for Natalizumab (NTZ) treatment in the year before (NO_NTZ vs NTZ group), to account for post-NTZ reactivation.

Results

Almost half of patients were NEDA after 2 years, 53.4% in the NO_NTZ group and 36.2% in the NTZ group. Despite an opposite trend during the first 6–12 months, at 2-year follow-up the two groups were comparable for relapses and number of new/enlarging T2 and Gd-enhancing lesions. Baseline parameters of higher disease activity (ARR, Gd enhancing lesions and age at onset) were associated with increased likelihood of failing NEDA criteria or with shorter time to relapse (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our data strengthen FTY effectiveness in everyday clinical practice, even in patients switching from NTZ treatment. Baseline parameters of inflammatory activity are the most important prognostic factors for mid-term disease reactivation also during second-line treatment with FTY, providing hints on how to select therapies towards a more personalized management.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gafson A, Craner MJ, Matthews PM (2016) Personalised medicine for multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler 23(3):362–369CrossRefPubMed Gafson A, Craner MJ, Matthews PM (2016) Personalised medicine for multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler 23(3):362–369CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Calabresi PA, Radue EW, Goodin D et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 13(6):545–556CrossRefPubMed Calabresi PA, Radue EW, Goodin D et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 13(6):545–556CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kappos L, Radue EW, O’Connor P et al (2010) A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362(5):387–401CrossRefPubMed Kappos L, Radue EW, O’Connor P et al (2010) A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362(5):387–401CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cohen JA, Barkhof F, Comi G et al (2010) Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362(5):402–415CrossRefPubMed Cohen JA, Barkhof F, Comi G et al (2010) Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362(5):402–415CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Alping P, Frisell T, Novakova L et al (2016) Rituximab versus fingolimod after natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 79(6):950–958CrossRefPubMed Alping P, Frisell T, Novakova L et al (2016) Rituximab versus fingolimod after natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 79(6):950–958CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Braune S, Lang M, Bergmann A, Neuro Trans Data Study G (2016) Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 263(2):327–333CrossRefPubMed Braune S, Lang M, Bergmann A, Neuro Trans Data Study G (2016) Efficacy of fingolimod is superior to injectable disease modifying therapies in second-line therapy of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 263(2):327–333CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Frisell T, Forsberg L, Nordin N et al (2016) Comparative analysis of first-year fingolimod and natalizumab drug discontinuation among Swedish patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22(1):85–93CrossRefPubMed Frisell T, Forsberg L, Nordin N et al (2016) Comparative analysis of first-year fingolimod and natalizumab drug discontinuation among Swedish patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22(1):85–93CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Pozzilli C et al (2015) Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138(Pt 11):3275–3286CrossRefPubMed Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Pozzilli C et al (2015) Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138(Pt 11):3275–3286CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lattanzi S, Danni M, Cerqua R, Taffi R, Provinciali L, Silvestrini M (2015) Prediction of disability progression in fingolimod-treated patients. J Neurol Sci 358(1–2):432–434CrossRefPubMed Lattanzi S, Danni M, Cerqua R, Taffi R, Provinciali L, Silvestrini M (2015) Prediction of disability progression in fingolimod-treated patients. J Neurol Sci 358(1–2):432–434CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Prosperini L, Sacca F, Cordioli C et al (2017) Real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod compared with self-injectable drugs in non-responders and in treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 264(2):284–294CrossRefPubMed Prosperini L, Sacca F, Cordioli C et al (2017) Real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod compared with self-injectable drugs in non-responders and in treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 264(2):284–294CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Izquierdo G, Damas F, Paramo MD, Ruiz-Pena JL, Navarro G (2017) The real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: an observational study. PLoS One 12(4):e0176174CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Izquierdo G, Damas F, Paramo MD, Ruiz-Pena JL, Navarro G (2017) The real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: an observational study. PLoS One 12(4):e0176174CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cohen M, Lebrun C (2014) Moving to fingolimod from natalizumab in multiple sclerosis-reply. JAMA Neurol 71(7):925CrossRefPubMed Cohen M, Lebrun C (2014) Moving to fingolimod from natalizumab in multiple sclerosis-reply. JAMA Neurol 71(7):925CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rotstein DL, Healy BC, Malik MT, Chitnis T, Weiner HL (2015) Evaluation of no evidence of disease activity in a 7-year longitudinal multiple sclerosis cohort. JAMA Neurol 72(2):152–158CrossRefPubMed Rotstein DL, Healy BC, Malik MT, Chitnis T, Weiner HL (2015) Evaluation of no evidence of disease activity in a 7-year longitudinal multiple sclerosis cohort. JAMA Neurol 72(2):152–158CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bevan CJ, Cree BA (2014) Disease activity free status: a new end point for a new era in multiple sclerosis clinical research? JAMA Neurol 71(3):269–270CrossRefPubMed Bevan CJ, Cree BA (2014) Disease activity free status: a new end point for a new era in multiple sclerosis clinical research? JAMA Neurol 71(3):269–270CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Papeix C, Vukusic S, Casey R et al (2016) Risk of relapse after natalizumab withdrawal: results from the French TYSEDMUS cohort. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 3(6):e297CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Papeix C, Vukusic S, Casey R et al (2016) Risk of relapse after natalizumab withdrawal: results from the French TYSEDMUS cohort. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 3(6):e297CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference O’Connor PW, Goodman A, Kappos L et al (2011) Disease activity return during natalizumab treatment interruption in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 76(22):1858–1865CrossRefPubMed O’Connor PW, Goodman A, Kappos L et al (2011) Disease activity return during natalizumab treatment interruption in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 76(22):1858–1865CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Totaro R, Di Carmine C, Costantino G et al (2015) Fingolimod treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a prospective observational multicenter postmarketing study. Mult Scler Int 2015:763418PubMedCentralPubMed Totaro R, Di Carmine C, Costantino G et al (2015) Fingolimod treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a prospective observational multicenter postmarketing study. Mult Scler Int 2015:763418PubMedCentralPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yamout BI, Zeineddine MM, Tamim H, Khoury SJ (2015) Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in clinical practice: the experience of an academic center in the Middle East. J Neuroimmunol 289:93–97CrossRefPubMed Yamout BI, Zeineddine MM, Tamim H, Khoury SJ (2015) Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in clinical practice: the experience of an academic center in the Middle East. J Neuroimmunol 289:93–97CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sangalli F, Moiola L, Ferre L et al (2014) Long-term management of natalizumab discontinuation in a large monocentric cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 3(4):520–526CrossRefPubMed Sangalli F, Moiola L, Ferre L et al (2014) Long-term management of natalizumab discontinuation in a large monocentric cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 3(4):520–526CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Horakova D, Kalincik T, Dolezal O et al (2012) Early predictors of non-response to interferon in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 126(6):390–397CrossRefPubMed Horakova D, Kalincik T, Dolezal O et al (2012) Early predictors of non-response to interferon in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 126(6):390–397CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rio J, Castillo J, Rovira A et al (2009) Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 15(7):848–853CrossRefPubMed Rio J, Castillo J, Rovira A et al (2009) Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 15(7):848–853CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Romeo M, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Rodegher M et al (2013) Clinical and MRI predictors of response to interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol 20(7):1060–1067CrossRefPubMed Romeo M, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Rodegher M et al (2013) Clinical and MRI predictors of response to interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol 20(7):1060–1067CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sormani MP, Rio J, Tintore M et al (2013) Scoring treatment response in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 19(5):605–612CrossRefPubMed Sormani MP, Rio J, Tintore M et al (2013) Scoring treatment response in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 19(5):605–612CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sormani MP, Gasperini C, Romeo M et al (2016) Assessing response to interferon-beta in a multicenter dataset of patients with MS. Neurology 87(2):134–140CrossRefPubMed Sormani MP, Gasperini C, Romeo M et al (2016) Assessing response to interferon-beta in a multicenter dataset of patients with MS. Neurology 87(2):134–140CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients
Authors
F. Esposito
L. Ferrè
F. Clarelli
M. A. Rocca
G. Sferruzza
L. Storelli
M. Radaelli
F. Sangalli
L. Moiola
B. Colombo
F. Martinelli Boneschi
G. Comi
M. Filippi
V. Martinelli
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8791-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Neurology 4/2018 Go to the issue