Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Communication

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus modulates reward processing and action selection in Parkinson patients

Authors: Caroline Wagenbreth, Tino Zaehle, Imke Galazky, Jürgen Voges, Marc Guitart-Masip, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Emrah Düzel

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for motor impairments in Parkinson’s disease (PD) but its effect on the motivational regulation of action control is still not fully understood. We investigated whether DBS of the STN influences the ability of PD patients to act for anticipated reward or loss, or whether DBS improves action execution independent of motivational valence. 16 PD patients (12 male, mean age = 58.5 ± 10.17 years) treated with bilateral STN-DBS and an age- and gender-matched group of healthy controls (HC) performed a go/no-go task whose contingencies explicitly decouple valence and action. Patients were tested with (ON) and without (OFF) active STN stimulation. For HC, there was a benefit in performing rewarded actions when compared to actions that avoided punishment. PD patients showed such a benefit reliably only when STN stimulation was ON. In fact, the relative behavioral benefit for go for reward over go to avoid losing was stronger in the PD patients under DBS ON than in HC. In PD patients, rather than generally improving motor functions independent of motivational valence, modulation of the STN by DBS improves action execution specifically when rewards are anticipated. Thus, STN-DBS establishes a reliable congruency between action and reward (“Pavlovian congruency”) and remarkably enhances it over the level observed in HC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P, Benazzouz A, Ardouin C, Hoffmann D, Benabid AL (1998) Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’ disease. N Eng J Med 339:1105–1111CrossRef Limousin P, Krack P, Pollak P, Benazzouz A, Ardouin C, Hoffmann D, Benabid AL (1998) Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’ disease. N Eng J Med 339:1105–1111CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ballanger B, van Eimeren T, Moro E, Lozano AM, Hamani C, Boulinguez P, Pellecchia G, Houle S, Poon YY, Lang AE, Strafella AP (2009) Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and impulsivity: release your horses. Ann Neurol 66:817–824PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ballanger B, van Eimeren T, Moro E, Lozano AM, Hamani C, Boulinguez P, Pellecchia G, Houle S, Poon YY, Lang AE, Strafella AP (2009) Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and impulsivity: release your horses. Ann Neurol 66:817–824PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guitart-Masip M, Economides M, Huys QJ, Frank MJ, Chowdhury R, Duzel E, Dayan P, Dolan RJ (2014) Differential, but not opponent, effects of l-DOPA and citalopram on action learning with reward and punishment. Psychopharmacology 231:955–966PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Guitart-Masip M, Economides M, Huys QJ, Frank MJ, Chowdhury R, Duzel E, Dayan P, Dolan RJ (2014) Differential, but not opponent, effects of l-DOPA and citalopram on action learning with reward and punishment. Psychopharmacology 231:955–966PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Guitart-Masip M, Huys QJM, Fuentemilla L, Dayan P, Duzel E, Dolan RJ (2012) Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect. NeuroImage 62:154–166CrossRefPubMed Guitart-Masip M, Huys QJM, Fuentemilla L, Dayan P, Duzel E, Dolan RJ (2012) Go and no-go learning in reward and punishment: interactions between affect and effect. NeuroImage 62:154–166CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Frank MJ, Seeberger LC, O’Reilly RC (2004) By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism. Science 306:1940–1943CrossRefPubMed Frank MJ, Seeberger LC, O’Reilly RC (2004) By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism. Science 306:1940–1943CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Salamone JD, Correa M, Mingote SM, Weber SM (2005) Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine. Curr Opin Pharmacol 5:34–41CrossRefPubMed Salamone JD, Correa M, Mingote SM, Weber SM (2005) Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine. Curr Opin Pharmacol 5:34–41CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Berridge KC, Robinson TE (1998) What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev 28:309–369CrossRefPubMed Berridge KC, Robinson TE (1998) What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev 28:309–369CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Frank MJ (2006) Hold your horses: a dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making. Neural Netw 19:1120–1136CrossRefPubMed Frank MJ (2006) Hold your horses: a dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making. Neural Netw 19:1120–1136CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Guitart-Masip M, Fuentemilla L, Bach DR, Huys QJM, Dayan P, Dolan RJ, Duzel E (2011) Action dominates valence in anticipatory representations in the human striatum and dopaminergic midbrain. J Neurosci 31:7867–7875PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Guitart-Masip M, Fuentemilla L, Bach DR, Huys QJM, Dayan P, Dolan RJ, Duzel E (2011) Action dominates valence in anticipatory representations in the human striatum and dopaminergic midbrain. J Neurosci 31:7867–7875PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Elias WJ, Fu KM, Frysinger RC (2007) Cortical and subcortical brain shift during stereotactic procedures. J Neurosurg 107:983–988CrossRefPubMed Elias WJ, Fu KM, Frysinger RC (2007) Cortical and subcortical brain shift during stereotactic procedures. J Neurosurg 107:983–988CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hristova A, Lyons K, Tröster AI, Pahwa R, Wilkinson SB, Koller WC (2000) Effect and time course of deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus and subthalamus on motor features of Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 23:208–211CrossRefPubMed Hristova A, Lyons K, Tröster AI, Pahwa R, Wilkinson SB, Koller WC (2000) Effect and time course of deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus and subthalamus on motor features of Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 23:208–211CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lopiano L, Torre E, Benedetti F, Bergamasco B, Perozzo P, Pollo A, Rizzone M, Tavella A, Lanotte M (2003) Temporal changes in movement time during the switch of the stimulators in Parkinson’s disease patients treated by subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Eur Neurol 50:94–99CrossRefPubMed Lopiano L, Torre E, Benedetti F, Bergamasco B, Perozzo P, Pollo A, Rizzone M, Tavella A, Lanotte M (2003) Temporal changes in movement time during the switch of the stimulators in Parkinson’s disease patients treated by subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Eur Neurol 50:94–99CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chowdhury R, Guitart-Masip M, Lambert C, Dolan R, Duzel E (2013) Structural integrity of the substantia nigra and subthalamic nucleus determines the flexibility of instrumental learning in old age. Neurobiol Aging 34:2261–2270PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chowdhury R, Guitart-Masip M, Lambert C, Dolan R, Duzel E (2013) Structural integrity of the substantia nigra and subthalamic nucleus determines the flexibility of instrumental learning in old age. Neurobiol Aging 34:2261–2270PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schroeder U, Kuehler A, Haslinger B, Erhard P, Fogel W, Tronnier VM, Lange KW, Boecker H, Ceballos-Baumann AO (2002) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation affects striato-anterior cingulate cortex circuit in a response conflict task: a PET study. Brain 125:1995–2004CrossRefPubMed Schroeder U, Kuehler A, Haslinger B, Erhard P, Fogel W, Tronnier VM, Lange KW, Boecker H, Ceballos-Baumann AO (2002) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation affects striato-anterior cingulate cortex circuit in a response conflict task: a PET study. Brain 125:1995–2004CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wylie SA, Ridderinkhof KR, Elias WJ, Frysinger RC, Bashore TR, Downs KE, van Wouwe NC, van den Wildenberg WP (2010) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences expression and suppression of impulsive behavior in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 133:3611–3624PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wylie SA, Ridderinkhof KR, Elias WJ, Frysinger RC, Bashore TR, Downs KE, van Wouwe NC, van den Wildenberg WP (2010) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences expression and suppression of impulsive behavior in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 133:3611–3624PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hershey T, Revilla FJ, Wernle A, Gibson PS, Dowling JL, Perlmutter JS (2004) Stimulation of STN impairs aspects of cognitive control in PD. Neurology 62:1110–1114CrossRefPubMed Hershey T, Revilla FJ, Wernle A, Gibson PS, Dowling JL, Perlmutter JS (2004) Stimulation of STN impairs aspects of cognitive control in PD. Neurology 62:1110–1114CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Temel Y, Kessels A, Tan S, Topdag A, Boon P, Visser-Vandewalle V (2006) Behavioural changes after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 12:265–272CrossRefPubMed Temel Y, Kessels A, Tan S, Topdag A, Boon P, Visser-Vandewalle V (2006) Behavioural changes after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 12:265–272CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Castner JE, Copland DA, Silburn PA, Coyne TJ, Sinclair F, Chenery HJ (2007) Lexical-semantic inhibitory mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease as a function of subthalamic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 45:3167–3177CrossRefPubMed Castner JE, Copland DA, Silburn PA, Coyne TJ, Sinclair F, Chenery HJ (2007) Lexical-semantic inhibitory mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease as a function of subthalamic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 45:3167–3177CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Schroeder U, Kuehler A, Hennenlotter A, Haslinger B, Tronnier VM, Krause M, Pfister R, Sprengelmeyer R, Lange KW, Ceballos-Baumann AO (2004) Facial expression recognition and subthalamic nucleus stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:648–650PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Schroeder U, Kuehler A, Hennenlotter A, Haslinger B, Tronnier VM, Krause M, Pfister R, Sprengelmeyer R, Lange KW, Ceballos-Baumann AO (2004) Facial expression recognition and subthalamic nucleus stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:648–650PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Serranová T, Sieger T, Dušek P, Růžička F, Urgošík D, Růžička E, Valls-Solé J, Jech R (2013) Sex, food and threat: startling changes after subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 6:740–745 Serranová T, Sieger T, Dušek P, Růžička F, Urgošík D, Růžička E, Valls-Solé J, Jech R (2013) Sex, food and threat: startling changes after subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 6:740–745
22.
go back to reference Lardeux S, Pernaud R, Paleressompoulle D, Baunez C (2009) Beyond the reward pathway: coding reward magnitude and error in the rat subthalamic nucleus. J Neurophysiol 102:2526–2537CrossRefPubMed Lardeux S, Pernaud R, Paleressompoulle D, Baunez C (2009) Beyond the reward pathway: coding reward magnitude and error in the rat subthalamic nucleus. J Neurophysiol 102:2526–2537CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lardeux S, Paleressompoulle D, Pernaud R, Cador M, Baunez C (2013) Different populations of subthalamic neurons encode cocaine versus sucrose reward and predict future error. J Neurophysiol 100:1497–1510CrossRef Lardeux S, Paleressompoulle D, Pernaud R, Cador M, Baunez C (2013) Different populations of subthalamic neurons encode cocaine versus sucrose reward and predict future error. J Neurophysiol 100:1497–1510CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baunez C, Dias C, Cador M, Amalric M (2005) The subthalamic nucleus exerts opposite control on cocaine and ‘natural’ rewards. Nat Neurosci 8:484–489PubMed Baunez C, Dias C, Cador M, Amalric M (2005) The subthalamic nucleus exerts opposite control on cocaine and ‘natural’ rewards. Nat Neurosci 8:484–489PubMed
Metadata
Title
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus modulates reward processing and action selection in Parkinson patients
Authors
Caroline Wagenbreth
Tino Zaehle
Imke Galazky
Jürgen Voges
Marc Guitart-Masip
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Emrah Düzel
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7749-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Journal of Neurology 6/2015 Go to the issue