Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 5/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Communication

Additional efficacy endpoints from pivotal natalizumab trials in relapsing-remitting MS

Authors: Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Steven L. Galetta, Gavin Giovannoni, Eva Havrdova, Michael Hutchinson, Ludwig Kappos, Paul W. O’Connor, J. Theodore Phillips, Chris Polman, William H. Stuart, Frances Lynn, Christophe Hotermans

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Standard clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies, such as disability progression defined by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate, may not fully reflect all aspects of therapeutic benefit experienced by patients. Pivotal studies showed that natalizumab is effective both as monotherapy (AFFIRM study) and in combination with interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) (SENTINEL study) in patients with relapsing MS. We present AFFIRM and SENTINEL data demonstrating the efficacy of natalizumab on prespecified tertiary endpoints, including extent of confirmed change in EDSS score from baseline, time to sustained progression to EDSS milestone scores, hospitalizations, corticosteroid use, and time to confirmed progression of cognitive deficits. Natalizumab significantly reduced changes in EDSS scores (P < 0.001) and proportion of patients progressing to an EDSS score ≥4.0 (P < 0.001) and ≥6.0 (P = 0.002) compared with placebo. Natalizumab + IFNβ-1a significantly reduced changes in EDSS scores compared with placebo + IFNβ-1a (P = 0.011). Based on 0.5 standard deviation change in paced auditory serial addition test-3 score, natalizumab treatment reduced the risk of confirmed progression of cognitive deficits by 43% compared with placebo (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.37, 0.89], P = 0.013); however, no significant difference between groups was seen in SENTINEL. Natalizumab, both as monotherapy and in combination with IFNβ-1a, significantly reduced the annualized rate of MS-related hospitalizations (by 64 and 61%, respectively) and the annualized rate of relapses severe enough to require steroid treatment (by 69 and 61%, respectively) compared with placebo and placebo + IFNβ-1a (P < 0.001). These analyses underline beneficial effects of natalizumab therapy in relapsing MS patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naci H, Fleurence R, Birt J, Duhig A (2010) Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 28:363–379PubMedCrossRef Naci H, Fleurence R, Birt J, Duhig A (2010) Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 28:363–379PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Rieckmann P, Hutchinson M (2010) New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 74:2004–2015PubMedCrossRef Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Rieckmann P, Hutchinson M (2010) New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 74:2004–2015PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hutchinson M (2007) Natalizumab: a new treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 3:259–269PubMedCrossRef Hutchinson M (2007) Natalizumab: a new treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 3:259–269PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E et al (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910PubMedCrossRef Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E et al (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al (2006) Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:911–923PubMedCrossRef Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al (2006) Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:911–923PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR et al (1999) The multiple sclerosis functional composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Mult Scler 5:244–250PubMed Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR et al (1999) The multiple sclerosis functional composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Mult Scler 5:244–250PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hoogervorst ELJ, Kalkers NF, van Winsen LML, MJ Uitdehaag B, Polman CH (2001) Differential treatment effect on measures of neurologic exam, functional impairment and patient self-report in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 7:335–339PubMed Hoogervorst ELJ, Kalkers NF, van Winsen LML, MJ Uitdehaag B, Polman CH (2001) Differential treatment effect on measures of neurologic exam, functional impairment and patient self-report in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 7:335–339PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41:685–691PubMedCrossRef Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41:685–691PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rovaris M, Riccitelli G, Judica E et al (2008) Cognitive impairment and structural brain damage in benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology 71:1521–1526PubMedCrossRef Rovaris M, Riccitelli G, Judica E et al (2008) Cognitive impairment and structural brain damage in benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology 71:1521–1526PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Miller D, Rudick RA, Hutchinson M (2010) Patient-centered outcomes: translating clinical efficacy into benefits on health-related quality of life. Neurology 74(Suppl 3):S24–S35PubMed Miller D, Rudick RA, Hutchinson M (2010) Patient-centered outcomes: translating clinical efficacy into benefits on health-related quality of life. Neurology 74(Suppl 3):S24–S35PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sutliff MH (2010) Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 26:109–119PubMedCrossRef Sutliff MH (2010) Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 26:109–119PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Salter AR, Cutter GR, Tyry T, Marrie RA, Vollmer T (2010) Impact of loss of mobility on instrumental activities of daily living and socioeconomic status in patients with MS. Curr Med Res Opin 26:493–500PubMedCrossRef Salter AR, Cutter GR, Tyry T, Marrie RA, Vollmer T (2010) Impact of loss of mobility on instrumental activities of daily living and socioeconomic status in patients with MS. Curr Med Res Opin 26:493–500PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fischer JS, Priore RL, Jacobs LD et al (2000) Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Ann Neurol 48:885–892PubMedCrossRef Fischer JS, Priore RL, Jacobs LD et al (2000) Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Ann Neurol 48:885–892PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Halper J (2007) The psychosocial effect of multiple sclerosis: the impact of relapses. J Neurol Sci 256(Suppl 1):S34–S38PubMedCrossRef Halper J (2007) The psychosocial effect of multiple sclerosis: the impact of relapses. J Neurol Sci 256(Suppl 1):S34–S38PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sellebjerg F, Barnes D, Filippini G et al (2005) EFNS guideline on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: report of an EFNS task force on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. Eur J Neurol 12:939–946PubMedCrossRef Sellebjerg F, Barnes D, Filippini G et al (2005) EFNS guideline on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: report of an EFNS task force on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. Eur J Neurol 12:939–946PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chataway J, Porter B, Riazi A et al (2006) Home versus outpatient administration of intravenous steroids for multiple-sclerosis relapses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 5:565–571PubMedCrossRef Chataway J, Porter B, Riazi A et al (2006) Home versus outpatient administration of intravenous steroids for multiple-sclerosis relapses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 5:565–571PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tyas D, Kerrigan J, Russell N, Nixon R (2007) The distribution of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the UK: how do costs vary by illness severity? Value Health 10:386–389PubMedCrossRef Tyas D, Kerrigan J, Russell N, Nixon R (2007) The distribution of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the UK: how do costs vary by illness severity? Value Health 10:386–389PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bourdette DN, Prochazka AV, Mitchell W, Licari P, Burks J (1993) Health care costs of veterans with multiple sclerosis: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:26–31PubMed Bourdette DN, Prochazka AV, Mitchell W, Licari P, Burks J (1993) Health care costs of veterans with multiple sclerosis: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:26–31PubMed
19.
go back to reference O’Brien JA, Ward AJ, Patrick AR, Caro J (2003) Cost of managing an episode of relapse in multiple sclerosis in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 3:17PubMedCrossRef O’Brien JA, Ward AJ, Patrick AR, Caro J (2003) Cost of managing an episode of relapse in multiple sclerosis in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 3:17PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Goodin DS, Cohen BA, O’Connor P, Kappos L, Stevens JC (2008) Assessment: the use of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review). Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 71:766–773PubMedCrossRef Goodin DS, Cohen BA, O’Connor P, Kappos L, Stevens JC (2008) Assessment: the use of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review). Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 71:766–773PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Additional efficacy endpoints from pivotal natalizumab trials in relapsing-remitting MS
Authors
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
Steven L. Galetta
Gavin Giovannoni
Eva Havrdova
Michael Hutchinson
Ludwig Kappos
Paul W. O’Connor
J. Theodore Phillips
Chris Polman
William H. Stuart
Frances Lynn
Christophe Hotermans
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6275-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Journal of Neurology 5/2012 Go to the issue