Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Communication

Evolution of dose and response to botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia: a multicenter study

Authors: Pedro J. Garcia Ruiz, Juan Carlos Martínez Castrillo, Juan A. Burguera, Victor Campos, Alfonso Castro, Esther Cancho, Jose Chacón, Jaime Hernández Vara, Javier Lopez del Val, Elena Lopez Garcia, Francesc Miquel, Pilar Sanz, Lydia Vela

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is an effective treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Long-term changes of several variables, including the dose of BoNT, in these patients is largely unknown. We reviewed the clinical charts of 275 patients with CD treated with BoNT type A (BoNT-A) for at least 5 years since 1989 at ten tertiary centers. The mean dose of BoNT-A per session during the first 5 years of treatment was calculated and the appearance of resistance was noted. The dose of BoNT-A for the whole group showed a significant trend to increase over time (year 1: 180 ± 65 U; year 5: 203 ± 63 U; ANOVA: p < 0.0001). However, when we studied the evolution of the dose of BoNT-A for those patients (n = 49) first injected after 2000 (introduction of current BOTOX preparation in our country), there was no significant increase in dose (year 1: 181.8 ± 75 U; year 5: 181.7 ± 75 U; ANOVA p: ns). A total of 19 patients became secondary nonresponders; all but one of these patients began BoNT-A treatment before 2000. In summary, there is a statistically significant increase of mean dose of BoNT-A per session over time, and this could be explained by the appearance of secondary nonresponders. On the other hand, those patients initially treated after 2000 did not show any statistically significant increase in dose for 5 years. This could be explained by better experience and techniques, fewer immunogenic problems with the current BoNT-A, and also less variability of the dose per vial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fukuda H, Kusumi M, Nakashima K (2006) Epidemiology of primary focal dystonias in the western area of Tottori prefecture in Japan: comparison with prevalence evaluated in 1993. Mov Disord 21:1503–1506PubMedCrossRef Fukuda H, Kusumi M, Nakashima K (2006) Epidemiology of primary focal dystonias in the western area of Tottori prefecture in Japan: comparison with prevalence evaluated in 1993. Mov Disord 21:1503–1506PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tsui JK, Eisen A, Stoessl AJ, Calne S, Calne DB (1986) Double blind study of botulinum toxin in spasmodic torticollis. Lancet 2:245–247PubMedCrossRef Tsui JK, Eisen A, Stoessl AJ, Calne S, Calne DB (1986) Double blind study of botulinum toxin in spasmodic torticollis. Lancet 2:245–247PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gelb D, Lowenstein D, Aminoff M (1989) Controlled trial of botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of spasmodic torticollis. Neurology 39:80–84PubMed Gelb D, Lowenstein D, Aminoff M (1989) Controlled trial of botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of spasmodic torticollis. Neurology 39:80–84PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jankovic J, Schwartz K (1990) Botulinum toxin injections for cervical dystonia. Neurology 40:277–280PubMed Jankovic J, Schwartz K (1990) Botulinum toxin injections for cervical dystonia. Neurology 40:277–280PubMed
5.
go back to reference Costa J, Espírito-Santo C, Borges A, Ferreira JJ, Coelho M, Moore P, Sampaio C (2005) Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25(1):CD003633 Costa J, Espírito-Santo C, Borges A, Ferreira JJ, Coelho M, Moore P, Sampaio C (2005) Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25(1):CD003633
6.
go back to reference Mejia N, Vuong K, Jankovic J (2005) Long-term botulinum toxin efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Mov Disord 20:592–597PubMedCrossRef Mejia N, Vuong K, Jankovic J (2005) Long-term botulinum toxin efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Mov Disord 20:592–597PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greene P, Fahn S, Diamond B (1994) Development of resistance to botulinum toxin type A in patients with torticollis. Mov Disord 9:213–217PubMedCrossRef Greene P, Fahn S, Diamond B (1994) Development of resistance to botulinum toxin type A in patients with torticollis. Mov Disord 9:213–217PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jankovic J, Schwartz K (1995) Response and immuneresistance to botulinum toxin injections. Neurology 45:1743–1746PubMed Jankovic J, Schwartz K (1995) Response and immuneresistance to botulinum toxin injections. Neurology 45:1743–1746PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sankhla C, Jankovic J, Duane D (1998) Variability of the immunologic and clinical response in dystonic patients immunoresistant to botulinum toxin injections. Mov Disord 13:150–154PubMedCrossRef Sankhla C, Jankovic J, Duane D (1998) Variability of the immunologic and clinical response in dystonic patients immunoresistant to botulinum toxin injections. Mov Disord 13:150–154PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cordivari C, Misra VP, Vincent A, Catania S, Bhatia KP, Lees AJ (2006) Secondary nonresponsiveness to botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia: the role of electromyogram-guided injections, botulinum toxin A antibody assay, and the extensor digitorum brevis test. Mov Disord 21:1737–1741PubMedCrossRef Cordivari C, Misra VP, Vincent A, Catania S, Bhatia KP, Lees AJ (2006) Secondary nonresponsiveness to botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia: the role of electromyogram-guided injections, botulinum toxin A antibody assay, and the extensor digitorum brevis test. Mov Disord 21:1737–1741PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brin MF, Comella CL, Jankovic J, Lai F, Naumann M, for the CD-017 BoNTA Study Group (2008) Long-term treatment with botulinum toxin type A in cervical dystonia has low immunogenicity by mouse protection assay. Mov Disord 23:1353–1360PubMedCrossRef Brin MF, Comella CL, Jankovic J, Lai F, Naumann M, for the CD-017 BoNTA Study Group (2008) Long-term treatment with botulinum toxin type A in cervical dystonia has low immunogenicity by mouse protection assay. Mov Disord 23:1353–1360PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jankovic J, Vuong KD, Ahsan J (2003) Comparison of efficacy and immunogenicity of original versus current botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia. Neurology 60:1186–1188PubMed Jankovic J, Vuong KD, Ahsan J (2003) Comparison of efficacy and immunogenicity of original versus current botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia. Neurology 60:1186–1188PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evolution of dose and response to botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia: a multicenter study
Authors
Pedro J. Garcia Ruiz
Juan Carlos Martínez Castrillo
Juan A. Burguera
Victor Campos
Alfonso Castro
Esther Cancho
Jose Chacón
Jaime Hernández Vara
Javier Lopez del Val
Elena Lopez Garcia
Francesc Miquel
Pilar Sanz
Lydia Vela
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5880-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Journal of Neurology 6/2011 Go to the issue