Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2020

01-07-2020 | Original Article

A new tool for identifying risk of repeated intimate partner violence adjusted for the population of Montenegro: a cohort study

Authors: N. Radojevic, B. Vukcevic, S. Begic, D. Vuksanovic Stankovic, S. V. Subramanian

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Current estimates suggest that approximately 20% of women and 11% of men have been victims of intimate partner violence. Risk identification tools for repeated domestic violence currently exist and have typically been designed by police and judicial authorities, based on the criminal history of the perpetrator. A follow-up cohort study of 238 cases of intimate partner violence (judicially processed and officially judged as DV according to Montenegrin Criminal Act) was conducted by reviewing randomly selected court files. The results showed that certain perpetrator characteristics (unemployment, lack of regret, other violent criminal history, and history of being beaten by a family member) and victim characteristics (nonqualified education and predictions of future harm) were associated with reassault. Relationship characteristics such as different ethnicity, poor socioeconomic status, difference in incomes, living in a rental property, alcohol and drug use, and unprocessed previous history of physical violence were also associated with repeated violence. A risk identification tool for repeated intimate violence was computed based on the significant variables, with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 89%. This study demonstrates a new tool for repeated intimate partner violence prediction in patriarchal societies, widespread in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The majority of factors associated with reassault in this sample have been shown to be predictive for repeated intimate partner violence in previous studies. The applicability of our tool in egalitarian societies should be investigated in order to see whether the combination of these factors is universal or specific to patriarchal societies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drijber B, Reijnders UJL, Ceelen M (2013) Male victims of domestic violence. J Fam Violence 28:173–178CrossRef Drijber B, Reijnders UJL, Ceelen M (2013) Male victims of domestic violence. J Fam Violence 28:173–178CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Forsdike K, Tarzia L, Hindmarsh E, Hegarty K (2014) Family violence across the life cycle. Aust Fam Physician 43(11):768–774PubMed Forsdike K, Tarzia L, Hindmarsh E, Hegarty K (2014) Family violence across the life cycle. Aust Fam Physician 43(11):768–774PubMed
3.
go back to reference Mitchell L (2011) Domestic violence in Australia — an overview of the issues: background note. Parliamentary Library, Canberra Mitchell L (2011) Domestic violence in Australia — an overview of the issues: background note. Parliamentary Library, Canberra
4.
go back to reference Eisenstat SA, Bancroft L (1999) Domestic violence. N Engl J Med 341:886–892CrossRef Eisenstat SA, Bancroft L (1999) Domestic violence. N Engl J Med 341:886–892CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Breiding MJ, Black MC, Ryan GW (2008) Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med 34:112–118CrossRef Breiding MJ, Black MC, Ryan GW (2008) Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med 34:112–118CrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2003) Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AtlantaCrossRef National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2003) Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AtlantaCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Black MC, Basile KC, Brieding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, Chen J, Stevens MR (2011) The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (Nisvs): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (CDC), Atlanta Black MC, Basile KC, Brieding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, Chen J, Stevens MR (2011) The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (Nisvs): 2010 summary report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (CDC), Atlanta
9.
go back to reference European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014) Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Main results. Vienna, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014) Violence against women: an EU-wide survey. Main results. Vienna, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
12.
go back to reference Heckert DA, Gondolf EW (2004) Battered women's perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. J Interpers Violence 19(7):778–800CrossRef Heckert DA, Gondolf EW (2004) Battered women's perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. J Interpers Violence 19(7):778–800CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams KR, Grant SR (2006) Empirically examining the risk of intimate partner violence: the revised domestic violence screening instrument (DVSI-R). Public Health Rep 121(4):400–408CrossRef Williams KR, Grant SR (2006) Empirically examining the risk of intimate partner violence: the revised domestic violence screening instrument (DVSI-R). Public Health Rep 121(4):400–408CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Williams KR, Houghton AB (2004) Assessing the risk of domestic violence reoffending: a validation study. Law Hum Behav 28(4):437–455CrossRef Williams KR, Houghton AB (2004) Assessing the risk of domestic violence reoffending: a validation study. Law Hum Behav 28(4):437–455CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Firth D (1993) Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80(1):27–38CrossRef Firth D (1993) Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80(1):27–38CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yount KM, Li L (2010) Domestic violence against married women in Egypt. Sex Roles 63:332–347CrossRef Yount KM, Li L (2010) Domestic violence against married women in Egypt. Sex Roles 63:332–347CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Klostermann KC, Fals-Stewart W (2006) Intimate partner violence and alcohol use: exploring the role of drinking in partner violence and its implications for intervention. Aggress Violent Behav 11:587–597CrossRef Klostermann KC, Fals-Stewart W (2006) Intimate partner violence and alcohol use: exploring the role of drinking in partner violence and its implications for intervention. Aggress Violent Behav 11:587–597CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shepard M (1992) Predicting batterer recidivism five years after community intervention. J Fam Violence 7(3):167–178CrossRef Shepard M (1992) Predicting batterer recidivism five years after community intervention. J Fam Violence 7(3):167–178CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stansfield R, Williams KR (2014) Predicting family violence using the DVSI-R: integrating survival analysis and perpetrator characteristics. Crim Justice Behav 41(2):163–180CrossRef Stansfield R, Williams KR (2014) Predicting family violence using the DVSI-R: integrating survival analysis and perpetrator characteristics. Crim Justice Behav 41(2):163–180CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fagan AA (2005) The relationship between adolescent physical abuse and criminal offending: support for an enduring and generalized cycle of violence. J Fam Violence 20:279–290CrossRef Fagan AA (2005) The relationship between adolescent physical abuse and criminal offending: support for an enduring and generalized cycle of violence. J Fam Violence 20:279–290CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dutton DG, Bodnarchuk M, Kropp R, Hart SD, Ogloff JRP (1997) Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: an 11-year follow-up. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 41(1):9–23CrossRef Dutton DG, Bodnarchuk M, Kropp R, Hart SD, Ogloff JRP (1997) Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: an 11-year follow-up. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 41(1):9–23CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C (2000) Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Psychol Assess 12(1):19–30CrossRef Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C (2000) Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Psychol Assess 12(1):19–30CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Williams KR (2012) Family violence risk assessment: a predictive cross-validation study of the domestic violence screening instrument-revised (DVSI-R). Law Hum Behav 36(2):120–129CrossRef Williams KR (2012) Family violence risk assessment: a predictive cross-validation study of the domestic violence screening instrument-revised (DVSI-R). Law Hum Behav 36(2):120–129CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME, Lang C, Cormier CA, Lines KJ (2004) A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychol Assess 16(3):267–275CrossRef Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME, Lang C, Cormier CA, Lines KJ (2004) A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychol Assess 16(3):267–275CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME, Houghton RE, Eke AW (2008) An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: the domestic violence risk appraisal guide. Law Hum Behav 32(2):150–156CrossRef Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME, Houghton RE, Eke AW (2008) An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: the domestic violence risk appraisal guide. Law Hum Behav 32(2):150–156CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME (2001) Predicting violence by serious wife assaulters. J Interpers Viol 16:408–423CrossRef Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME (2001) Predicting violence by serious wife assaulters. J Interpers Viol 16:408–423CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new tool for identifying risk of repeated intimate partner violence adjusted for the population of Montenegro: a cohort study
Authors
N. Radojevic
B. Vukcevic
S. Begic
D. Vuksanovic Stankovic
S. V. Subramanian
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02244-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2020 Go to the issue

Topical Collection on COVID-19

Inside the lungs of COVID-19 disease