Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 5/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Article

A general model for likelihood computations of genetic marker data accounting for linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and mutations

Authors: Daniel Kling, Andreas Tillmar, Thore Egeland, Petter Mostad

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Several applications necessitate an unbiased determination of relatedness, be it in linkage or association studies or in a forensic setting. An appropriate model to compute the joint probability of some genetic data for a set of persons given some hypothesis about the pedigree structure is then required. The increasing number of markers available through high-density SNP microarray typing and NGS technologies intensifies the demand, where using a large number of markers may lead to biased results due to strong dependencies between closely located loci, both within pedigrees (linkage) and in the population (allelic association or linkage disequilibrium (LD)). We present a new general model, based on a Markov chain for inheritance patterns and another Markov chain for founder allele patterns, the latter allowing us to account for LD. We also demonstrate a specific implementation for X chromosomal markers that allows for computation of likelihoods based on hypotheses of alleged relationships and genetic marker data. The algorithm can simultaneously account for linkage, LD, and mutations. We demonstrate its feasibility using simulated examples. The algorithm is implemented in the software FamLinkX, providing a user-friendly GUI for Windows systems (FamLinkX, as well as further usage instructions, is freely available at www.​famlink.​se). Our software provides the necessary means to solve cases where no previous implementation exists. In addition, the software has the possibility to perform simulations in order to further study the impact of linkage and LD on computed likelihoods for an arbitrary set of markers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abecasis GR, Wigginton JE (2005) Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers. Am J Hum Genet 77(5):754–67PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Abecasis GR, Wigginton JE (2005) Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers. Am J Hum Genet 77(5):754–67PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR (2002) Merlin–rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30(1):97–101CrossRefPubMed Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR (2002) Merlin–rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30(1):97–101CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Boyles AL, Scott WK, Martin ER, Schmidt S, Li YJ, Ashley-Koch A, Bass MP, Schmidt M, Pericak-Vance MA, Speer MC, Hauser ER (2005) Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. Hum Hered 59(4):220–227PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Boyles AL, Scott WK, Martin ER, Schmidt S, Li YJ, Ashley-Koch A, Bass MP, Schmidt M, Pericak-Vance MA, Speer MC, Hauser ER (2005) Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. Hum Hered 59(4):220–227PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brinkmann B, Klintschar M, Neuhuber F, Huhne J, Rolf B (1998) Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. Am J Hum Genet 62(6):1408–1415PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Brinkmann B, Klintschar M, Neuhuber F, Huhne J, Rolf B (1998) Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. Am J Hum Genet 62(6):1408–1415PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chakraborty R, Stivers DN, Zhong Y (1996) Estimation of mutation rates from parentage exclusion data: applications to STR and VNTR loci. Mutat Res 354(1):41–48CrossRefPubMed Chakraborty R, Stivers DN, Zhong Y (1996) Estimation of mutation rates from parentage exclusion data: applications to STR and VNTR loci. Mutat Res 354(1):41–48CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dawid AP, Mortera J, Pascali VL (2001) Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int 124(1):55–61CrossRefPubMed Dawid AP, Mortera J, Pascali VL (2001) Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. Forensic Sci Int 124(1):55–61CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Egeland T, Sheehan N (2008) On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(3):219–25CrossRefPubMed Egeland T, Sheehan N (2008) On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(3):219–25CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Elston RC, Stewart J (1971) A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 21(6):523–42CrossRefPubMed Elston RC, Stewart J (1971) A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 21(6):523–42CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gudbjartsson DF, Jonasson K, Frigge ML, Kong A (2000) Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis. Nat Genet 25(1):12–13CrossRefPubMed Gudbjartsson DF, Jonasson K, Frigge ML, Kong A (2000) Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis. Nat Genet 25(1):12–13CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Huang Q, Shete S, Amos CI (2004) Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis. Am J Hum Genet 75(6):1106–1112PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Huang Q, Shete S, Amos CI (2004) Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis. Am J Hum Genet 75(6):1106–1112PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Idury R, Elston R (1997) A faster and more general hidden markov model algorithm for multipoint likelihood calculations. Hum Hered 47(4):197–202CrossRefPubMed Idury R, Elston R (1997) A faster and more general hidden markov model algorithm for multipoint likelihood calculations. Hum Hered 47(4):197–202CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kling D, Egeland T, Tillmar AO (2012a) Famlink-a user friendly software for linkage calculations in family genetics. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 6(5):616–620CrossRef Kling D, Egeland T, Tillmar AO (2012a) Famlink-a user friendly software for linkage calculations in family genetics. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 6(5):616–620CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kling D, Welander J, Tillmar A, Skare Ø Egeland T, Holmlund G (2012b) DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness—current status and future prospects. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 6(3):322–329CrossRef Kling D, Welander J, Tillmar A, Skare Ø Egeland T, Holmlund G (2012b) DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness—current status and future prospects. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 6(3):322–329CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Krawczak M (2007) Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 1(2):111–114CrossRef Krawczak M (2007) Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues. Forensic Sci Int: Genet 1(2):111–114CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kruglyak L, Lander ES (1998) Faster multipoint linkage analysis using fourier transforms. J Comput Biol 5(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed Kruglyak L, Lander ES (1998) Faster multipoint linkage analysis using fourier transforms. J Comput Biol 5(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES (1996) Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 58(6):1347PubMedCentralPubMed Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES (1996) Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 58(6):1347PubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kurbasic A, Hossjer O (2008) A general method for linkage disequilibrium correction for multipoint linkage and association. Genet Epidemiol 32(7):647–57CrossRefPubMed Kurbasic A, Hossjer O (2008) A general method for linkage disequilibrium correction for multipoint linkage and association. Genet Epidemiol 32(7):647–57CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nothnagel M, Szibor R, Vollrath O, Augustin C, Edelmann J, Geppert M, Alves C, Gusmao L, Vennemann M, Hou Y, Immel UD, Inturri S, Luo H, Lutz-Bonengel S, Robino C, Roewer L, Rolf B, Sanft J, Shin KJ, Sim JE, Wiegand P, Winkler C, Krawczak M, Hering S (2012) Collaborative genetic mapping of 12 forensic short tandem repeat (str) loci on the human x chromosome. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(6):778–84CrossRefPubMed Nothnagel M, Szibor R, Vollrath O, Augustin C, Edelmann J, Geppert M, Alves C, Gusmao L, Vennemann M, Hou Y, Immel UD, Inturri S, Luo H, Lutz-Bonengel S, Robino C, Roewer L, Rolf B, Sanft J, Shin KJ, Sim JE, Wiegand P, Winkler C, Krawczak M, Hering S (2012) Collaborative genetic mapping of 12 forensic short tandem repeat (str) loci on the human x chromosome. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(6):778–84CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pinto N, Gusmao L, Amorim A (2011) X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(1):27–32CrossRefPubMed Pinto N, Gusmao L, Amorim A (2011) X-chromosome markers in kinship testing: a generalisation of the IBD approach identifying situations where their contribution is crucial. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(1):27–32CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pinto N, Silva PV, Amorim A (2012) A general method to assess the utility of the x-chromosomal markers in kinship testing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(2):198–207CrossRefPubMed Pinto N, Silva PV, Amorim A (2012) A general method to assess the utility of the x-chromosomal markers in kinship testing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(2):198–207CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Skare O, Sheehan N, Egeland T (2009) Identification of distant family relationships. Bioinformatics 25(18):2376–82CrossRefPubMed Skare O, Sheehan N, Egeland T (2009) Identification of distant family relationships. Bioinformatics 25(18):2376–82CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Szibor R (2007) X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1(2):93–9CrossRefPubMed Szibor R (2007) X-chromosomal markers: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1(2):93–9CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S, Edelmann J, Kuhlisch E, Krause D (2003) Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 117(2):67–74PubMed Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S, Edelmann J, Kuhlisch E, Krause D (2003) Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 117(2):67–74PubMed
26.
go back to reference Tillmar AO (2012) Population genetic analysis of 12 X-STRs in Swedish population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(2):e80–81CrossRefPubMed Tillmar AO (2012) Population genetic analysis of 12 X-STRs in Swedish population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(2):e80–81CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tillmar AO, Egeland T, Lindblom B, Holmlund G, Mostad P (2011) Using X-chromosomal markers in relationship testing: calculation of likelihood ratios taking both linkage and linkage disequilibrium into account. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(5):506–511CrossRefPubMed Tillmar AO, Egeland T, Lindblom B, Holmlund G, Mostad P (2011) Using X-chromosomal markers in relationship testing: calculation of likelihood ratios taking both linkage and linkage disequilibrium into account. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(5):506–511CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Weir BS, Anderson AD, Hepler AB (2006) Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nat Rev Genet 7(10):771–780CrossRefPubMed Weir BS, Anderson AD, Hepler AB (2006) Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nat Rev Genet 7(10):771–780CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A general model for likelihood computations of genetic marker data accounting for linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and mutations
Authors
Daniel Kling
Andreas Tillmar
Thore Egeland
Petter Mostad
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1117-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

International Journal of Legal Medicine 5/2015 Go to the issue