Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans

Authors: Gabriele Christa Krüger, Ericka N. L’Abbé, Kyra E. Stull, Michael W. Kenyhercz

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Pattern expressions of morphoscopic cranial traits vary across populations with classification accuracies being highly dependent on the reference collection to which unknown skulls are compared. Despite recent developments in population-specific standards for South Africans, researchers have not addressed the accuracy of morphological methods. Several studies demonstrate differences in sexual dimorphism between South Africans and North Americans, warranting a need to re-evaluate sex estimation methods in South Africa. The purposes of this study were to test the reliability and accuracy of the Walker (2008) method and to examine patterns of sexual dimorphism among South Africans. A total of 245 modern Black and White South African male and female crania from the Pretoria Bone Collection, University of Pretoria, were scored using the Walker (2008) methodology. Cohen’s kappa was used to evaluate reliability of the method, and percent correct assessed validity of the method. Logistic regression was utilised to create modified population-specific formulae. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was moderate to excellent (0.60–0.90), except for the mental eminence (0.40). The percent correct results for sex were 80 % or higher for combinations of glabella, mastoid and menton and between 68 % and 73 % for menton, mastoid, orbital and nuchal margin using logistic equations of Walker (2008). White males had the highest (94–97 %) and White females had the lowest (31–62 %) percent correct. The low accuracies obtained when using Walker’s (2008) equations emphasised the need for population-specific sex estimation models. Modified formulae for South Africans were created, yielding higher classification rates (84–93 %) than when North American standards were employed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Loth SR, İşcan MY (2000) Sex Determination. In: Siegel J, Knupfer G, Saukko P (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 252–260CrossRef Loth SR, İşcan MY (2000) Sex Determination. In: Siegel J, Knupfer G, Saukko P (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 252–260CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gapert R, Black S, Last J (2008) Sex determination from the occipital condyle: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Am J Forensic Anthropol 138:384–394CrossRef Gapert R, Black S, Last J (2008) Sex determination from the occipital condyle: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Am J Forensic Anthropol 138:384–394CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Aḉsádi G, Nemeskéri J (1970) History of human life span and mortality. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, p 346 Aḉsádi G, Nemeskéri J (1970) History of human life span and mortality. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, p 346
4.
go back to reference Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, Arkansas, pp 15–46 Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, Arkansas, pp 15–46
5.
go back to reference Walker PL (2008) Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Forensic Anthropol 136:39–50CrossRef Walker PL (2008) Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Forensic Anthropol 136:39–50CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Garvin HM (2012) Adult sex determination: methods and application. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom, pp 239–247CrossRef Garvin HM (2012) Adult sex determination: methods and application. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom, pp 239–247CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brickley M (2004) Determination of sex from archaeological skeletal material and assessment of parturition. In: Brickley M, McKinley JI (eds) Standards for recording human remains. BABAO, Southampton, pp 23–25 Brickley M (2004) Determination of sex from archaeological skeletal material and assessment of parturition. In: Brickley M, McKinley JI (eds) Standards for recording human remains. BABAO, Southampton, pp 23–25
8.
go back to reference Ramsthaler F, Kettner M, Gehl A, Verhoff MA (2010) Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Forensic Sci Int 195:148–152PubMedCrossRef Ramsthaler F, Kettner M, Gehl A, Verhoff MA (2010) Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Forensic Sci Int 195:148–152PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference McDowell JL, L’Abbé EN, Kenyhercz MW (2012) Nasal aperture shape evaluation between black and white South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 222(1–3):397e1–397e6 McDowell JL, L’Abbé EN, Kenyhercz MW (2012) Nasal aperture shape evaluation between black and white South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 222(1–3):397e1–397e6
10.
go back to reference Ousley S, L’Abbé EN (2010) Craniometric variation in South African and American Blacks. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Seattle, WA, pp 377–378 Ousley S, L’Abbé EN (2010) Craniometric variation in South African and American Blacks. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Seattle, WA, pp 377–378
11.
go back to reference L’Abbé EN, Kenyhercz M, Stull KE, Keough N, Nawrocki S (2013) Application of Fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of North American and South African blacks and whites. J Forensic Sci 58(3):1579–1583PubMedCrossRef L’Abbé EN, Kenyhercz M, Stull KE, Keough N, Nawrocki S (2013) Application of Fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of North American and South African blacks and whites. J Forensic Sci 58(3):1579–1583PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kenyhercz MW, Klales AR, Fredette SM and Dirkmaat DC (2012) Metric and non-metric assessments of sex: accuracy, correlation and corroboration. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Atlanta, GA, pp 406–407 Kenyhercz MW, Klales AR, Fredette SM and Dirkmaat DC (2012) Metric and non-metric assessments of sex: accuracy, correlation and corroboration. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Atlanta, GA, pp 406–407
13.
go back to reference L’Abbé EN, Loots M, Meiring JH (2005) The Pretoria Bone Collection: a modern South African skeletal sample. HOMO 56:197–205PubMedCrossRef L’Abbé EN, Loots M, Meiring JH (2005) The Pretoria Bone Collection: a modern South African skeletal sample. HOMO 56:197–205PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vance VL, Steyn M, L’Abbé EN, Becker PJ (2010) A cross-sectional analysis of age related changes in the osteometric dimensions of long bones in modern South Africans of European and African descent. Forensic Sci Int 199:11.e1–110.e9CrossRef Vance VL, Steyn M, L’Abbé EN, Becker PJ (2010) A cross-sectional analysis of age related changes in the osteometric dimensions of long bones in modern South Africans of European and African descent. Forensic Sci Int 199:11.e1–110.e9CrossRef
15.
go back to reference L’Abbé EN, Steyn M (2012) The establishment and advancement of forensic anthropology in South Africa. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom, pp 626–638CrossRef L’Abbé EN, Steyn M (2012) The establishment and advancement of forensic anthropology in South Africa. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom, pp 626–638CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Banerjee M, Capozzoli L, McSweeney, Debajyoti S (1999) Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures. Can J Stat 27(1):3–23CrossRef Banerjee M, Capozzoli L, McSweeney, Debajyoti S (1999) Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures. Can J Stat 27(1):3–23CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Taylor R (1990) Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Son 1:35–39CrossRef Taylor R (1990) Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Son 1:35–39CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG (1994) Basic & clinical biostatistics, 2nd edn. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, pp 210–231 Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG (1994) Basic & clinical biostatistics, 2nd edn. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, pp 210–231
20.
go back to reference Kachigan SK (1991) Multivariate statistical analysis: a conceptual introduction, 2nd edn. Radius Press, New York, pp 216–235 Kachigan SK (1991) Multivariate statistical analysis: a conceptual introduction, 2nd edn. Radius Press, New York, pp 216–235
21.
22.
go back to reference Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56(2):289–296PubMedCrossRef Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56(2):289–296PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Garvin HM, Sholts SB, Mosca LA (2014) Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size. Am J Phys Anthropol 154:259–269PubMedCrossRef Garvin HM, Sholts SB, Mosca LA (2014) Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size. Am J Phys Anthropol 154:259–269PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hefner JT, Spradley MK, Anderson B (2014) Ancestry assessment using random forest modeling. J Forensic Sci 59(3):583–589PubMedCrossRef Hefner JT, Spradley MK, Anderson B (2014) Ancestry assessment using random forest modeling. J Forensic Sci 59(3):583–589PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Marks MK (2014) Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med 128(5):861–872PubMedCrossRef Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Marks MK (2014) Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med 128(5):861–872PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Macaluso PJ, Lucena J (2014) Estimation of sex from sternal dimensions derived from chest plate radiographs in contemporary Spaniards. Int J Legal Med 128(2):389–395PubMedCrossRef Macaluso PJ, Lucena J (2014) Estimation of sex from sternal dimensions derived from chest plate radiographs in contemporary Spaniards. Int J Legal Med 128(2):389–395PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South Africans
Authors
Gabriele Christa Krüger
Ericka N. L’Abbé
Kyra E. Stull
Michael W. Kenyhercz
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1111-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2015 Go to the issue