Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Technical Note

Guidelines for doctors attending detainees in police custody: a consensus conference in France

Authors: Patrick Chariot, Philippe Martel, Michel Penneau, Michel Debout

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Medical practice in police custody needs to be harmonized. A consensus conference was held on 2–3 December 2004 in Paris, France. The health, integrity, and dignity of detainees must be safeguarded. The examination should take place in the police station so that the doctor can assess the conditions in which the detainee is being held. If the minimum conditions needed for a medical examination are not available, the doctor may refuse to express an opinion as to whether the detainee is fit to be held in custody or may ask for the detainee to be examined in a hospital. Doctors are subject to a duty of care and prevention. They should prescribe any ongoing treatment that needs to be continued, as well as any emergency treatment required. Custody officers may monitor the detainee and administer medication. However, their role should not be expected to exceed that required of the detainee’s family under normal circumstances and must be specified in writing on the medical certificate. Doctor’s opinion should be given in a national standard document. If the doctors consider that the custody conditions are disgraceful, they may refuse to express an opinion as to whether the detainee is fit for custody.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anonymous (ed) (1993) Three-faced practice: doctors and police custody. Lancet 341:1245–1247 Anonymous (ed) (1993) Three-faced practice: doctors and police custody. Lancet 341:1245–1247
2.
go back to reference Moon G, Kelly K, Savage SP, Bradshaw Y (1995) Developing Britain’s police surgeon service. BMJ 311:1587PubMed Moon G, Kelly K, Savage SP, Bradshaw Y (1995) Developing Britain’s police surgeon service. BMJ 311:1587PubMed
3.
go back to reference Brinkmann B (1999) Harmonisation of medico–legal autopsy rules. Int J Leg Med 113:1–14CrossRef Brinkmann B (1999) Harmonisation of medico–legal autopsy rules. Int J Leg Med 113:1–14CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mavroforou A, Michalodimitrakis E (2002) Forensic pathology on the threshold of the 21st century and the need for harmonization of current practice and training. The greek concept. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 23:19–25PubMedCrossRef Mavroforou A, Michalodimitrakis E (2002) Forensic pathology on the threshold of the 21st century and the need for harmonization of current practice and training. The greek concept. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 23:19–25PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chariot P, Bourokba N, Durigon M (2002) Forensic medicine in France. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 23:403PubMedCrossRef Chariot P, Bourokba N, Durigon M (2002) Forensic medicine in France. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 23:403PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference ANAES (1999) Conférences de consensus-base méthodologique pour leur réalisation en France. ANAES, Paris ANAES (1999) Conférences de consensus-base méthodologique pour leur réalisation en France. ANAES, Paris
8.
go back to reference Franklin P (2000) The medical management in police custody of alcohol dependent detained persons. J Clin Forensic Med 7:201–203PubMedCrossRef Franklin P (2000) The medical management in police custody of alcohol dependent detained persons. J Clin Forensic Med 7:201–203PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roberts G, Roberts J, Patton HF, Patton M, Megson K, Murphy R (2006) A qualitative and quantitative survey of forensic medical examiner workload in the Northumbria Police Force area October 2002–January 2003. J Clin Forensic Med 13:1–8PubMedCrossRef Roberts G, Roberts J, Patton HF, Patton M, Megson K, Murphy R (2006) A qualitative and quantitative survey of forensic medical examiner workload in the Northumbria Police Force area October 2002–January 2003. J Clin Forensic Med 13:1–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chariot P, Ragot F, Authier FJ, Questel F, Diamant-Berger O (2001) Focal neurological complications of handcuff application. J Forensic Sci 46:1124–1125PubMed Chariot P, Ragot F, Authier FJ, Questel F, Diamant-Berger O (2001) Focal neurological complications of handcuff application. J Forensic Sci 46:1124–1125PubMed
Metadata
Title
Guidelines for doctors attending detainees in police custody: a consensus conference in France
Authors
Patrick Chariot
Philippe Martel
Michel Penneau
Michel Debout
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0157-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2008 Go to the issue