Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2022

Open Access 01-02-2022 | Cochlear Implant | Otology

Using a cochlear implant processor as contralateral routing of signals device in unilateral cochlear implant recipients

Authors: Tom Gawliczek, Jérémie Guignard, Christoph Schmid, Wilhelm Wimmer, Marco Caversaccio, Martin Kompis, Stefan Weder

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients, a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) device enables to receive auditory information from the unaided side. This study investigates the feasibility as well as subjective and objective benefits of using a CI processor as a CROS device in unilateral CI recipients.

Methods

This is a single-center, prospective cohort study. First, we tested the directionality of the CROS processor in an acoustic chamber. Second, we examined the difference of speech perception in quiet and in noise in ten unilateral CI recipients with and without the CROS processor. Third, subjective ratings with the CROS processor were evaluated according to the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement Questionnaire.

Results

There was a time delay between the two devices of 3 ms. Connection of the CROS processor led to a summation effect of 3 dB as well as a more constant amplification along all azimuths. Speech perception in quiet showed an increased word recognition score at 50 dB (mean improvement 7%). In noise, the head shadow effect could be mitigated with significant gain in speech perception (mean improvement 8.4 dB). This advantage was reversed in unfavorable listening situations, where the CROS device considerably amplified the noise (mean:  – 4.8 dB). Subjectively, patients who did not normally wear a hearing aid on the non-CI side were satisfied with the CROS device.

Conclusions

The connection and synchronization of a CI processor as a CROS device is technically feasible and the signal processing strategies of the device can be exploited. In contra-laterally unaided patients, a subjective benefit can be achieved when wearing the CROS processor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Rinia AB, Van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Hendrice N, Free RH, Maat B, Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Mylanus EAM, Huinck WJ, Smit AL, Topsakal V, Tange RA, Grolman W (2016) Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(3):249–256CrossRef Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Rinia AB, Van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Hendrice N, Free RH, Maat B, Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Mylanus EAM, Huinck WJ, Smit AL, Topsakal V, Tange RA, Grolman W (2016) Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(3):249–256CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113(3):1617–1630CrossRef van Hoesel RJM, Tyler RS (2003) Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 113(3):1617–1630CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wimmer W, Kompis M, Stieger C, Caversaccio M, Weder S (2017) Directional microphone contralateral routing of signals in cochlear implant users: a within-subjects comparison. Comparative Study 38(3):6 Wimmer W, Kompis M, Stieger C, Caversaccio M, Weder S (2017) Directional microphone contralateral routing of signals in cochlear implant users: a within-subjects comparison. Comparative Study 38(3):6
4.
go back to reference Guevara N, Grech C, Gahide I, Gallego S (2015) Assessment of the contralateral routing of signal system in unilateral cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol 40(6):535–544CrossRef Guevara N, Grech C, Gahide I, Gallego S (2015) Assessment of the contralateral routing of signal system in unilateral cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol 40(6):535–544CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Loon MC, Goverts ST, Merkus P, Hensen EF, Smits C (2014) The addition of a contralateral microphone for unilateral cochlear implant users: not an alternative for bilateral cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 35(9):e233–239 van Loon MC, Goverts ST, Merkus P, Hensen EF, Smits C (2014) The addition of a contralateral microphone for unilateral cochlear implant users: not an alternative for bilateral cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 35(9):e233–239
6.
go back to reference Weder S, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Stieger C (2015) Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurotol 20(2):73–80CrossRef Weder S, Kompis M, Caversaccio M, Stieger C (2015) Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurotol 20(2):73–80CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Arora R, Amoodi H, Stewart S, Friesen L, Lin V, Nedzelski J, Chen J (2013) The addition of a contralateral routing of signals microphone to a unilateral cochlear implant system—A prospective study in speech outcomes. The Laryngoscope 123(3):746–751CrossRef Arora R, Amoodi H, Stewart S, Friesen L, Lin V, Nedzelski J, Chen J (2013) The addition of a contralateral routing of signals microphone to a unilateral cochlear implant system—A prospective study in speech outcomes. The Laryngoscope 123(3):746–751CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grewal AS, Kuthubutheen J, Smilsky K, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM, Friesen L, Lin VYW (2015) The role of a new contralateral routing of signal microphone in established unilateral cochlear implant recipients. The Laryngoscope 125(1):197–202CrossRef Grewal AS, Kuthubutheen J, Smilsky K, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM, Friesen L, Lin VYW (2015) The role of a new contralateral routing of signal microphone in established unilateral cochlear implant recipients. The Laryngoscope 125(1):197–202CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mosnier I, Lahlou G, Flament J, Mathias N, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Bernardeschi D, Nguyen Y (2019) Benefits of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral Naída CI cochlear implant recipients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(8):2205–2213CrossRef Mosnier I, Lahlou G, Flament J, Mathias N, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Bernardeschi D, Nguyen Y (2019) Benefits of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral Naída CI cochlear implant recipients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(8):2205–2213CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kurien G, Hwang E, Smilsky K, Smith L, Lin VYW, Nedzelski J, Chen JM (2019) The benefit of a wireless contralateral routing of signals (CROS) microphone in unilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 40(2):e82–e88 Kurien G, Hwang E, Smilsky K, Smith L, Lin VYW, Nedzelski J, Chen JM (2019) The benefit of a wireless contralateral routing of signals (CROS) microphone in unilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 40(2):e82–e88
11.
go back to reference Dillon H, James A, Ginis J (1997) Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 8(1):27–43PubMed Dillon H, James A, Ginis J (1997) Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 8(1):27–43PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kompis M, Krebs M, Häusler R (2006) Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test. HNO 54(6):445–450CrossRef Kompis M, Krebs M, Häusler R (2006) Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test. HNO 54(6):445–450CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999) Development and evaluation of a German sentence test Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test. Audiologic Acoust 38:86Y95 Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999) Development and evaluation of a German sentence test Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test. Audiologic Acoust 38:86Y95
14.
go back to reference Traer J, McDermott JH (2016) Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(48):E7856CrossRef Traer J, McDermott JH (2016) Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(48):E7856CrossRef
15.
go back to reference McKay CM, Remine MD, McDermott HJ (2001) Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 110(3,Pt1):1514–24 McKay CM, Remine MD, McDermott HJ (2001) Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 110(3,Pt1):1514–24
16.
go back to reference Weder S, Shoushtarian M, Olivares V, Zhou X, Innes-Brown H, McKay C (2020) Cortical fNIRS Responses can be better explained by loudness percept than sound intensity. Ear Hear Weder S, Shoushtarian M, Olivares V, Zhou X, Innes-Brown H, McKay C (2020) Cortical fNIRS Responses can be better explained by loudness percept than sound intensity. Ear Hear
17.
go back to reference Taal CH, van Barneveld DCPBM, Soede W, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2016) Benefit of contralateral routing of signals for unilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 140(1):393–401 Taal CH, van Barneveld DCPBM, Soede W, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2016) Benefit of contralateral routing of signals for unilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 140(1):393–401
19.
go back to reference Gatehouse S, Noble W (2004) The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 43(2):85–99CrossRef Gatehouse S, Noble W (2004) The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 43(2):85–99CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Berrettini S, Passetti S, Giannarelli M, Forli F (2010) Benefit from bimodal hearing in a group of prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users. Am J Otolaryngol 31(5):332–338CrossRef Berrettini S, Passetti S, Giannarelli M, Forli F (2010) Benefit from bimodal hearing in a group of prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users. Am J Otolaryngol 31(5):332–338CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm D, Chenier J, Armstrong S (2009) Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid. Int J Audiol 48(4):172–182CrossRef Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm D, Chenier J, Armstrong S (2009) Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid. Int J Audiol 48(4):172–182CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Illg A, Bojanowicz M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T, Büchner A (2014) Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid. Otol Neurotol 35(9):e240-244CrossRef Illg A, Bojanowicz M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T, Büchner A (2014) Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid. Otol Neurotol 35(9):e240-244CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fischer T, Schmid C, Kompis M, Mantokoudis G, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W (2020) Pinna-imitating microphone directionality improves sound localization and discrimination in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear Fischer T, Schmid C, Kompis M, Mantokoudis G, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W (2020) Pinna-imitating microphone directionality improves sound localization and discrimination in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear
24.
go back to reference Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M (2016) Speech intelligibility in noise with a pinna effect imitating cochlear implant processor. Otol Neurotol 37(1):19–23CrossRef Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M (2016) Speech intelligibility in noise with a pinna effect imitating cochlear implant processor. Otol Neurotol 37(1):19–23CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using a cochlear implant processor as contralateral routing of signals device in unilateral cochlear implant recipients
Authors
Tom Gawliczek
Jérémie Guignard
Christoph Schmid
Wilhelm Wimmer
Marco Caversaccio
Martin Kompis
Stefan Weder
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06684-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2022 Go to the issue