Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Vestibular Schwannoma | Otology

Hearing rehabilitation after subtotal cochleoectomy using a new, perimodiolar malleable cochlear implant electrode array: a preliminary report

Authors: Stefan K. Plontke, Laura Fröhlich, Sebastian Cozma, Assen Koitschev, Katrin Reimann, Rainer Weiß, Gerrit Götze, Ingmar Seiwerth, Sabrina Kösling, Torsten Rahne

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We here report about the first surgical experience and audiological outcome using a new, perimodiolar malleable cochlear implant electrode array for hearing rehabilitation after subtotal cochleoectomy for intralabyrinthine schwannoma (ILS).

Method

Based on a cochlear implant with MRI compatibility of the magnet in the receiver coil up to 3 T, a cochlear implant electrode array was developed that is malleable and can be placed perimodiolar after tumor removal from the cochlea via subtotal cochleoectomy. Malleability was reached by incorporating a nitinol wire into the silicone of the electrode array lateral to the electrode contacts. The custom-made device was implanted in four patients with intracochlear, intravestibulocochlear or transmodiolar schwannomas. Outcome was assessed by evaluating the feasibility of the surgical procedure and by measuring sound field thresholds and word recognition scores.

Results

After complete or partial tumor removal via subtotal cochleoectomy with or without labyrinthectomy, the new, perimodiolar malleable electrode array could successfully be implanted in all four patients. Six months after surgery, the averaged sound field thresholds to pulsed narrowband noise in the four patients were 36, 28, 41, and 35 dB HL, and the word recognitions scores for monosyllables at 65 dB SPL were 65, 80, 70, and 25% (one patient non-German speaking).

Conclusion

The surgical evaluation demonstrated the feasibility of cochlear implantation with the new, perimodiolar malleable electrode array after subtotal cochleoectomy. The audiological results were comparable to those achieved with another commercially available type of perimodiolar electrode array from a different manufacturer applied in patients with ILS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Laszig R et al (2017) Treatment and auditory rehabilitation of intralabyrinthine schwannoma by means of cochlear implants: English version. Hno 65:46–51CrossRef Aschendorff A, Arndt S, Laszig R et al (2017) Treatment and auditory rehabilitation of intralabyrinthine schwannoma by means of cochlear implants: English version. Hno 65:46–51CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Neff BA, Sladen DP et al (2016) Cochlear implantation in patients with intracochlear and intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 37:647–653CrossRef Carlson ML, Neff BA, Sladen DP et al (2016) Cochlear implantation in patients with intracochlear and intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 37:647–653CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grupe G, Wagner J, Hofmann S et al (2017) Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients: English version. HNO 65:35–40CrossRef Grupe G, Wagner J, Hofmann S et al (2017) Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients: English version. HNO 65:35–40CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leinung M, Loth A, Groger M et al (2020) Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:1297–1304CrossRef Leinung M, Loth A, Groger M et al (2020) Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:1297–1304CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Plontke SK (2020) An improved technique of subtotal cochleoectomy for removal of intracochlear schwannoma and single stage cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol (in press) Plontke SK (2020) An improved technique of subtotal cochleoectomy for removal of intracochlear schwannoma and single stage cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol (in press)
6.
go back to reference Plontke SK, Frohlich L, Wagner L et al (2020) How much cochlea do you need for cochlear implantation? Otol Neurotol 41:694–703CrossRef Plontke SK, Frohlich L, Wagner L et al (2020) How much cochlea do you need for cochlear implantation? Otol Neurotol 41:694–703CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Plontke SK, Kosling S, Rahne T (2018) Cochlear implantation after partial or subtotal cochleoectomy for intracochlear schwannoma removal-a technical report. Otol Neurotol 39:365–371CrossRef Plontke SK, Kosling S, Rahne T (2018) Cochlear implantation after partial or subtotal cochleoectomy for intracochlear schwannoma removal-a technical report. Otol Neurotol 39:365–371CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Plontke SK, Rahne T, Kosling S (2018) Sudden hearing loss, vertigo and Tinnitus—a patient's 12-year odyssey. Laryngorhinootologie 97:490–492CrossRef Plontke SK, Rahne T, Kosling S (2018) Sudden hearing loss, vertigo and Tinnitus—a patient's 12-year odyssey. Laryngorhinootologie 97:490–492CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Plontke SK, Rahne T, Pfister M et al (2017) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: surgical management and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants. HNO 65:136–148CrossRef Plontke SK, Rahne T, Pfister M et al (2017) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: surgical management and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants. HNO 65:136–148CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rahne T, Hocke T, Strauss C et al (2019) Perioperative recording of cochlear implant evoked brain stem responses after removal of the intralabyrinthine portion of a vestibular schwannoma in a patient with NF2. Otol Neurotol 40:e20–e24CrossRef Rahne T, Hocke T, Strauss C et al (2019) Perioperative recording of cochlear implant evoked brain stem responses after removal of the intralabyrinthine portion of a vestibular schwannoma in a patient with NF2. Otol Neurotol 40:e20–e24CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD et al (2008) A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels. Otol Neurotol 29:784–788CrossRef Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD et al (2008) A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels. Otol Neurotol 29:784–788CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Blineder M et al (2014) FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies. Ear Hear 35:e272–281CrossRef Riss D, Hamzavi JS, Blineder M et al (2014) FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies. Ear Hear 35:e272–281CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shew M, Wichova H, Lin J et al (2019) Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: are we truly practicing MRI safety? Laryngoscope 129:482–489CrossRef Shew M, Wichova H, Lin J et al (2019) Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: are we truly practicing MRI safety? Laryngoscope 129:482–489CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tam YC, Lee JWY, Gair J et al (2020) Performing MRI scans on cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients: review of 14.5 years experience. Otol Neurotol 41:e556–e562CrossRef Tam YC, Lee JWY, Gair J et al (2020) Performing MRI scans on cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant recipients: review of 14.5 years experience. Otol Neurotol 41:e556–e562CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tieleman A, Casselman JW, Somers T et al (2008) Imaging of intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a retrospective study of 52 cases with emphasis on lesion growth. Am J Neuroradiol 29:898–905CrossRef Tieleman A, Casselman JW, Somers T et al (2008) Imaging of intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a retrospective study of 52 cases with emphasis on lesion growth. Am J Neuroradiol 29:898–905CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Todt I, Rademacher G, Mittmann P et al (2017) Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal: visualization of active auditory implants. HNO 65:81–86CrossRef Todt I, Rademacher G, Mittmann P et al (2017) Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal: visualization of active auditory implants. HNO 65:81–86CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Todt I, Tittel A, Ernst A et al (2017) Pain free 3 T MRI scans in cochlear implantees. Otol Neurotol 38:e401–e404CrossRef Todt I, Tittel A, Ernst A et al (2017) Pain free 3 T MRI scans in cochlear implantees. Otol Neurotol 38:e401–e404CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vermeire K, Punte AK, Van De Heyning P (2010) Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 72:305–311CrossRef Vermeire K, Punte AK, Van De Heyning P (2010) Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 72:305–311CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wagner L, Plontke SK, Fröhlich L et al. (2020) Reduced spread of electric field after surgical removal of intracochlear schwannoma and cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol (in press) Wagner L, Plontke SK, Fröhlich L et al. (2020) Reduced spread of electric field after surgical removal of intracochlear schwannoma and cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol (in press)
Metadata
Title
Hearing rehabilitation after subtotal cochleoectomy using a new, perimodiolar malleable cochlear implant electrode array: a preliminary report
Authors
Stefan K. Plontke
Laura Fröhlich
Sebastian Cozma
Assen Koitschev
Katrin Reimann
Rainer Weiß
Gerrit Götze
Ingmar Seiwerth
Sabrina Kösling
Torsten Rahne
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06098-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2021 Go to the issue