Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Cochlear Implant | Otology

Dyna-CT of the temporal bone for case-specific three-dimensional rendering of the stapedial muscle for planning of electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold determination during cochlear implantation directly from the stapedius muscle via a retrofacial approach: a pilot study

Authors: Gerd Fabian Volk, René Aschenbach, Maria Gadyuchko, Thomas Bitter, Sven Koscielny, Ulf Teichgräber, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluation of 3D Dyna-CTs to improve cochlear implantation (CI) planning and intraoperative electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold (ESRT) measurements.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study was performed. Anonymized data collection of Dyna-CTs and CI surgeries in which a retrofacial approach was implemented to access the stapedius muscle. 3D Dyna-CTs of 30 patients and the intraoperative confirmation of the predication in 5/30 patients during CI surgery were evaluated. Inter-rater reliability was also analyzed along with the predictive value of this evaluation.

Results

36 representative structures of the middle and inner ear and 3D renderings of the Dyna-CTs were evaluated by four otoneurological surgeons. Fleiss’ kappa values for the evaluation of the visibility were high (> 0.7) for most of the anatomical structures. The stapedius muscle was visible in 90% of the cases. Using the 3D data, the retrofacial access to the stapedius muscles was estimated as feasible in 86.7%. Fleiss’ kappa value of the evaluation of the accessibility was 0.942. The intraoperative exploration of the stapedius muscle confirmed the preoperative prediction in all five selected patients (four patients with predicted accessibility and one patient with predicted inaccessibility).

Conclusions

The use of Dyna-CT and 3D rendering is a helpful tool for preoperative planning of cochlear implantations and ESRT measurements from the stapedius muscle via the retrofacial approach.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Piergallini L, Scola E, Tuscano B et al (2018) Flat-panel CT versus 128-slice CT in temporal bone imaging: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 106:106–113CrossRef Piergallini L, Scola E, Tuscano B et al (2018) Flat-panel CT versus 128-slice CT in temporal bone imaging: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 106:106–113CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K et al (2009) Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 30:299–303CrossRef Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K et al (2009) Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 30:299–303CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Theunisse HJ, Joemai RM, Maal TJ et al (2015) Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation—a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 36:592–599CrossRef Theunisse HJ, Joemai RM, Maal TJ et al (2015) Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation—a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 36:592–599CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Posadzy M, Desimpel J, Vanhoenacker F (2018) Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications. Insights Imaging 9:35–45CrossRef Posadzy M, Desimpel J, Vanhoenacker F (2018) Cone beam CT of the musculoskeletal system: clinical applications. Insights Imaging 9:35–45CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guyader E, Savean J, Clodic C et al (2018) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the temporal bone: comparison of in situ, CT, and CBCT measurements. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 135:393–398CrossRef Guyader E, Savean J, Clodic C et al (2018) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the temporal bone: comparison of in situ, CT, and CBCT measurements. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 135:393–398CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kennedy TA, Connell N, Szczykutowicz T et al (2016) Flat-panel CT for cochlear implant electrode imaging: comparison to multi-detector CT. Otol Neurotol 37:1646–1653CrossRef Kennedy TA, Connell N, Szczykutowicz T et al (2016) Flat-panel CT for cochlear implant electrode imaging: comparison to multi-detector CT. Otol Neurotol 37:1646–1653CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zaoui K, Kromeier J, Neudert M et al (2014) Clinical investigation of flat panel CT following middle ear reconstruction: a study of 107 patients. Eur Radiol 24:587–594CrossRef Zaoui K, Kromeier J, Neudert M et al (2014) Clinical investigation of flat panel CT following middle ear reconstruction: a study of 107 patients. Eur Radiol 24:587–594CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jun BC, Song SW, Cho JE et al (2005) Three-dimensional reconstruction based on images from spiral high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone: anatomy and clinical application. J Laryngol Otol 119:693–698CrossRef Jun BC, Song SW, Cho JE et al (2005) Three-dimensional reconstruction based on images from spiral high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone: anatomy and clinical application. J Laryngol Otol 119:693–698CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Noble JH, Dawant BM, Warren FM et al (2009) Automatic identification and 3D rendering of temporal bone anatomy. Otol Neurotol 30:436–442CrossRef Noble JH, Dawant BM, Warren FM et al (2009) Automatic identification and 3D rendering of temporal bone anatomy. Otol Neurotol 30:436–442CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pau HW, Zehlicke T, Sievert U et al (2009) Electromyographical recording of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex via a bipolar hook electrode. Otol Neurotol 30:1–6CrossRef Pau HW, Zehlicke T, Sievert U et al (2009) Electromyographical recording of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex via a bipolar hook electrode. Otol Neurotol 30:1–6CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chuang MT, Chiang IC, Liu GC et al (2006) Multidetector row CT demonstration of inner and middle ear structures. Clin Anat 19:337–344CrossRef Chuang MT, Chiang IC, Liu GC et al (2006) Multidetector row CT demonstration of inner and middle ear structures. Clin Anat 19:337–344CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Van Den Abbeele T, Noel-Petroff N, Akin I et al (2012) Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters? Cochlear Implants Int 13:26–34CrossRef Van Den Abbeele T, Noel-Petroff N, Akin I et al (2012) Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters? Cochlear Implants Int 13:26–34CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Andrade KC, Leal Mde C, Muniz LF et al (2014) The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:68–77CrossRef Andrade KC, Leal Mde C, Muniz LF et al (2014) The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:68–77CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weiss BG, Sochting F, Bertlich M et al (2018) An objective method to determine the electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold during cochlea implantation. Otol Neurotol 39:e5–e11PubMed Weiss BG, Sochting F, Bertlich M et al (2018) An objective method to determine the electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold during cochlea implantation. Otol Neurotol 39:e5–e11PubMed
15.
go back to reference Pulec JL (1996) Sinus tympani: retrofacial approach for the removal of cholesteatomas. Ear Nose Throat J 75:77, 81–3, 6–8 Pulec JL (1996) Sinus tympani: retrofacial approach for the removal of cholesteatomas. Ear Nose Throat J 75:77, 81–3, 6–8
16.
go back to reference Yilmazer R, Gerring RC, Sidani C et al (2018) The feasibility of retrofacial approach for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 39:e550–e556CrossRef Yilmazer R, Gerring RC, Sidani C et al (2018) The feasibility of retrofacial approach for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 39:e550–e556CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rizk H, O'Connell B, Stevens S et al (2015) Retrofacial approach to access the round window for cochlear implantation of malformed ears. Otol Neurotol 36:e79–83CrossRef Rizk H, O'Connell B, Stevens S et al (2015) Retrofacial approach to access the round window for cochlear implantation of malformed ears. Otol Neurotol 36:e79–83CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schneider D, Stenin I, Anso J et al (2019) Robotic cochlear implantation: feasibility of a multiport approach in an ex vivo model. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1283–1289CrossRef Schneider D, Stenin I, Anso J et al (2019) Robotic cochlear implantation: feasibility of a multiport approach in an ex vivo model. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1283–1289CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dyna-CT of the temporal bone for case-specific three-dimensional rendering of the stapedial muscle for planning of electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold determination during cochlear implantation directly from the stapedius muscle via a retrofacial approach: a pilot study
Authors
Gerd Fabian Volk
René Aschenbach
Maria Gadyuchko
Thomas Bitter
Sven Koscielny
Ulf Teichgräber
Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05773-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2020 Go to the issue