Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Otology

Evaluation of auditory temporal processing in patients fitted with bone-anchored hearing aids

Authors: Emre Gürses, Meral Didem Türkyılmaz, Gonca Sennaroğlu

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The present study aimed to identify temporal processing abilities in users of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA).

Methods

Seventeen subjects with BAHA (SWB) users and 29 subjects with normal-hearing were compared using the frequency pattern test, duration pattern test, and speech-in-noise test. Besides behavioral temporal processing tests, a multi-feature mismatch negativity (MMN) test was performed in BAHA users to assess the accuracy of objective auditory discrimination at the cortical level, irrespective of the subjects’ attention or behavioral task.

Results

The results of the multi-feature MMN test showed that BAHA users could perceive differences in frequency, duration, intensity. However, no response was elicited regarding localization of stimulus and gaps within tones. Word recognition performance in noise was significantly poorer compared with normal hearing groups. All age groups showed no differences in terms of temporal processing abilities except 30–39 years duration pattern ability weaker in SWB group.

Conclusion

The present study was the first to indicate that the use of unilateral BAHA has no effect on the localization of auditory stimuli at the cortical level according to electrophysiological test. Although Baha users have near-normal levels of hearing thresholds and temporal ordering abilities with their devices, since they benefit from the unilateral device, they still have some difficulties in resolution, recognizing and distinguishing the spatial aspects of speech, especially in multiple and noisy listening environments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kompis M, Caversaccio M-D (2011) Implantable bone conduction hearing aids. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, BaselCrossRef Kompis M, Caversaccio M-D (2011) Implantable bone conduction hearing aids. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, BaselCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Desmet J, Bouzegta R, Hofkens A, De Backer A, Lambrechts P, Wouters K, Claes J, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P (2012) Clinical need for a Baha trial in patients with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Analysis of a Baha database of 196 patients. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 269(3):799–805CrossRef Desmet J, Bouzegta R, Hofkens A, De Backer A, Lambrechts P, Wouters K, Claes J, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P (2012) Clinical need for a Baha trial in patients with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Analysis of a Baha database of 196 patients. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 269(3):799–805CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gunduz B, Bilgin C, Gokdogan C, Tutar H, Bayazit YA, Goksu N (2013) Hearing amplification and quality of life with bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in Turkish population. J Int Adv Otol 9(1):55 Gunduz B, Bilgin C, Gokdogan C, Tutar H, Bayazit YA, Goksu N (2013) Hearing amplification and quality of life with bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in Turkish population. J Int Adv Otol 9(1):55
5.
go back to reference Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF, Hol MK (2013) Benefit of Baha in the elderly with single-sided deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(4):1285–1291CrossRef Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF, Hol MK (2013) Benefit of Baha in the elderly with single-sided deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(4):1285–1291CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Houtgast T, Festen JM (2008) On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual’s elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise. Int J Audiol 47(6):287–295CrossRef Houtgast T, Festen JM (2008) On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual’s elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise. Int J Audiol 47(6):287–295CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mcardle R, Wilson RH (2008) The necessity of a speech-in-noise measure as a component of the audiological evaluation. Audiol Today 20(3):29–31 Mcardle R, Wilson RH (2008) The necessity of a speech-in-noise measure as a component of the audiological evaluation. Audiol Today 20(3):29–31
10.
go back to reference Rasmussen J, Olsen SØ, Nielsen LH (2012) Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the Baha® bone conduction implant. Int J Audiol 51(3):194–199CrossRef Rasmussen J, Olsen SØ, Nielsen LH (2012) Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the Baha® bone conduction implant. Int J Audiol 51(3):194–199CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang X, Fan Y, Zhao F, Wang Z, Ge J, Zhang K, Gao Z, Gao J-H, Yang Y, Fan J, Zou Q, Liu P (2014) Altered regional and circuit resting-state activity associated with unilateral hearing loss. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96126CrossRef Wang X, Fan Y, Zhao F, Wang Z, Ge J, Zhang K, Gao Z, Gao J-H, Yang Y, Fan J, Zou Q, Liu P (2014) Altered regional and circuit resting-state activity associated with unilateral hearing loss. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96126CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Elangovan S, Cranford JL, Walker L, Stuart A (2005) A comparison of the mismatch negativity and a differential waveform response: La comparación de la negatividad desigual (mismatch negativity) y de una respuesta de onda diferencial. Int J Audiol 44(11):637–646CrossRef Elangovan S, Cranford JL, Walker L, Stuart A (2005) A comparison of the mismatch negativity and a differential waveform response: La comparación de la negatividad desigual (mismatch negativity) y de una respuesta de onda diferencial. Int J Audiol 44(11):637–646CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Füllgrabe C, Moore BC, Stone MA (2015) Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Front Aging Neurosci 6:347PubMed Füllgrabe C, Moore BC, Stone MA (2015) Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Front Aging Neurosci 6:347PubMed
14.
go back to reference Turkyilmaz MD, Yilmaz S, Yagcioglu S, Yaralı M, Celik N (2012) Computerised Turkish versions of tests for central auditory processing disorder. J Hear Sci 2(1):30–35 Turkyilmaz MD, Yilmaz S, Yagcioglu S, Yaralı M, Celik N (2012) Computerised Turkish versions of tests for central auditory processing disorder. J Hear Sci 2(1):30–35
15.
go back to reference Musiek FE (1994) Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 5:265–268PubMed Musiek FE (1994) Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 5:265–268PubMed
16.
go back to reference Vuust P, Brattico E, Seppänen M, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2012) The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm. Neuropsychologia 50(7):1432–1443CrossRef Vuust P, Brattico E, Seppänen M, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2012) The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm. Neuropsychologia 50(7):1432–1443CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lopez-Calderon J, Luck SJ (2014) ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 8:213CrossRef Lopez-Calderon J, Luck SJ (2014) ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 8:213CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cesur S, Derinsu EU (2017) Effect of aging on temporal resolution. Turkish J Geriatr 20(3):178–186 Cesur S, Derinsu EU (2017) Effect of aging on temporal resolution. Turkish J Geriatr 20(3):178–186
23.
go back to reference Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB (2003) Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 113(4):2084–2094CrossRef Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB (2003) Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 113(4):2084–2094CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stenfelt S (2005) Bilateral fitting of BAHAs and BAHA® fitted in unilateral deaf persons: acoustical aspects. Int J Audiol 44(3):178–189CrossRef Stenfelt S (2005) Bilateral fitting of BAHAs and BAHA® fitted in unilateral deaf persons: acoustical aspects. Int J Audiol 44(3):178–189CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rahne T, Ehelebe T, Rasinski C, Götze G (2010) Auditory brainstem and cortical potentials following bone-anchored hearing aid stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 193(2):300–306CrossRef Rahne T, Ehelebe T, Rasinski C, Götze G (2010) Auditory brainstem and cortical potentials following bone-anchored hearing aid stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 193(2):300–306CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of auditory temporal processing in patients fitted with bone-anchored hearing aids
Authors
Emre Gürses
Meral Didem Türkyılmaz
Gonca Sennaroğlu
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05701-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2020 Go to the issue