Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2020

Open Access 01-01-2020 | Foreign Body Aspiration | Laryngology

Prediction of aspiration in dysphagia using logistic regression: oral intake and self-evaluation

Authors: Bas J. Heijnen, Stefan Böhringer, Renée Speyer

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) has a major influence on health in general and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in particular. The gold standard assessments for OD, especially for aspiration in OD, are fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy (VFSS), but not all patients have access to such procedures. Therefore, the current study built a prediction model to forecast aspiration in patients with OD on the basis of common self-evaluation questionnaires and oral intake status.

Methods

A consecutive series of 111 patients with confirmed diagnosis of OD was measured according to a standardised protocol using the following tools: the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL), the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI), two self-report visual analogue scales which measure the Severity and the Impairment of the swallowing problem on everyday social life as experienced by the patient, the Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10), the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and subsequently FEES (the gold standard). Penalised logistic regression was carried out to predict aspiration. The performance of the resulting models was evaluated by constructing receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and computing areas under the curve (AUC).

Results

The final model showed an AUC of 0.92, indicating excellent performance.

Conclusion

This study shows that it may be possible to accurately predict aspiration in oropharyngeal dysphagia by a non-invasive and non-instrumental assessment protocol including oral intake status and self-report questionnaires on functional health status and HR-QoL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eslick GD, Talley NJ (2008) Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life—a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27(10):971–979CrossRef Eslick GD, Talley NJ (2008) Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life—a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27(10):971–979CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martino R et al (2005) Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 36(12):2756–2763CrossRef Martino R et al (2005) Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 36(12):2756–2763CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Speyer R (2013) Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 46(6):989–1008CrossRef Speyer R (2013) Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 46(6):989–1008CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garcia-Peris P et al (2007) Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr 26(6):710–717CrossRef Garcia-Peris P et al (2007) Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life. Clin Nutr 26(6):710–717CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fattori B et al (2016) Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 36(5):395–402PubMedPubMedCentral Fattori B et al (2016) Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 36(5):395–402PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kertscher B et al (2014) Bedside screening to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: an updated systematic review. Dysphagia 29(2):204–212CrossRef Kertscher B et al (2014) Bedside screening to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: an updated systematic review. Dysphagia 29(2):204–212CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Andrade MS et al (2017) Correlation between swallowing-related quality of life and videofluoroscopy after head and neck cancer treatment. Codas 29(1):e20150175PubMed Andrade MS et al (2017) Correlation between swallowing-related quality of life and videofluoroscopy after head and neck cancer treatment. Codas 29(1):e20150175PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pedersen A et al (2016) Swallowing outcome measures in head and neck cancer—how do they compare? Oral Oncol 52:104–108CrossRef Pedersen A et al (2016) Swallowing outcome measures in head and neck cancer—how do they compare? Oral Oncol 52:104–108CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME (2005) Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86(8):1516–1520CrossRef Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME (2005) Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86(8):1516–1520CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rofes L et al (2014) Sensitivity and specificity of the eating assessment tool and the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26(9):1256–1265CrossRef Rofes L et al (2014) Sensitivity and specificity of the eating assessment tool and the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26(9):1256–1265CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kuhn M, Johnson K (2016) Applied Predictive Modeling. Springer, New York, p 600 Kuhn M, Johnson K (2016) Applied Predictive Modeling. Springer, New York, p 600
13.
go back to reference De Ruyck K et al (2013) A predictive model for dysphagia following IMRT for head and neck cancer: introduction of the EMLasso technique. Radiother Oncol 107(3):295–299CrossRef De Ruyck K et al (2013) A predictive model for dysphagia following IMRT for head and neck cancer: introduction of the EMLasso technique. Radiother Oncol 107(3):295–299CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Langendijk JA et al (2009) A predictive model for swallowing dysfunction after curative radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 90(2):189–195CrossRef Langendijk JA et al (2009) A predictive model for swallowing dysfunction after curative radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 90(2):189–195CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Han TR et al (2008) The prediction of persistent dysphagia beyond six months after stroke. Dysphagia 23(1):59–64CrossRef Han TR et al (2008) The prediction of persistent dysphagia beyond six months after stroke. Dysphagia 23(1):59–64CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Frakking T et al (2016) Aspirating and nonaspirating swallow sounds in children: a pilot study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125(12):1001–1009CrossRef Frakking T et al (2016) Aspirating and nonaspirating swallow sounds in children: a pilot study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125(12):1001–1009CrossRef
17.
go back to reference McHorney CA et al (2000) The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia 15(3):115–121CrossRef McHorney CA et al (2000) The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia 15(3):115–121CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McHorney CA et al (2000) The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia 15(3):122–133CrossRef McHorney CA et al (2000) The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia 15(3):122–133CrossRef
19.
go back to reference McHorney CA et al (2002) The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia 17(2):97–114CrossRef McHorney CA et al (2002) The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia 17(2):97–114CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Timmerman AA et al (2014) Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia 29(2):183–198CrossRef Timmerman AA et al (2014) Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia 29(2):183–198CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rosenbek JC, Jones HN (2008) Dysphagia in movement disorders. Plural Publishing, United Kingdom Rosenbek JC, Jones HN (2008) Dysphagia in movement disorders. Plural Publishing, United Kingdom
22.
go back to reference Silbergleit AK et al (2012) The dysphagia handicap index: development and validation. Dysphagia 27(1):46–52CrossRef Silbergleit AK et al (2012) The dysphagia handicap index: development and validation. Dysphagia 27(1):46–52CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Heijnen BJ et al (2012) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation versus traditional therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease and oropharyngeal dysphagia: effects on quality of life. Dysphagia 27(3):336–345CrossRef Heijnen BJ et al (2012) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation versus traditional therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease and oropharyngeal dysphagia: effects on quality of life. Dysphagia 27(3):336–345CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Belafsky PC et al (2008) Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(12):919–924CrossRef Belafsky PC et al (2008) Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(12):919–924CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cordier R et al (2017) Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) using Rasch Analysis. Dysphagia 32(2):250–260CrossRef Cordier R et al (2017) Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) using Rasch Analysis. Dysphagia 32(2):250–260CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baijens LW et al (2014) FEES protocol derived estimates of sensitivity: aspiration in dysphagic patients. Dysphagia 29(5):583–590CrossRef Baijens LW et al (2014) FEES protocol derived estimates of sensitivity: aspiration in dysphagic patients. Dysphagia 29(5):583–590CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rosenbek JC et al (1996) A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia 11(2):93–98CrossRef Rosenbek JC et al (1996) A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia 11(2):93–98CrossRef
29.
go back to reference R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
30.
go back to reference Speyer R, Kertscher B, Cordier R (2014) Functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res 3(5):1043–1048 Speyer R, Kertscher B, Cordier R (2014) Functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res 3(5):1043–1048
31.
go back to reference Speyer R et al (2011) Quality of life in oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index. Dysphagia 26(4):407–414CrossRef Speyer R et al (2011) Quality of life in oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index. Dysphagia 26(4):407–414CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Miles A et al (2013) Comparison of cough reflex test against instrumental assessment of aspiration. Physiol Behav 118:25–31CrossRef Miles A et al (2013) Comparison of cough reflex test against instrumental assessment of aspiration. Physiol Behav 118:25–31CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Muche R (2008) Logistic regression: a useful tool in rehabilitation research. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 47(1):56–62CrossRef Muche R (2008) Logistic regression: a useful tool in rehabilitation research. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 47(1):56–62CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Courvoisier DS et al (2011) Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure. J Clin Epidemiol 64(9):993–1000CrossRef Courvoisier DS et al (2011) Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure. J Clin Epidemiol 64(9):993–1000CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36CrossRef Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Patterson J, Wilson JA (2011) The clinical value of dysphagia preassessment in the management of head and neck cancer patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(3):177–181CrossRef Patterson J, Wilson JA (2011) The clinical value of dysphagia preassessment in the management of head and neck cancer patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(3):177–181CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prediction of aspiration in dysphagia using logistic regression: oral intake and self-evaluation
Authors
Bas J. Heijnen
Stefan Böhringer
Renée Speyer
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05687-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2020 Go to the issue