Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Smelling Disorder | Rhinology

Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food

Authors: Y. Zang, P. Han, S. Burghardt, A. Knaapila, V. Schriever, T. Hummel

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Eating-related problems are among the most frequent issues in olfactory impairment, causing a noticeable loss of quality of life for some of the affected persons. To what extent olfactory dysfunction impacts on the sensory perception of food is less explored. The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food aromas, as well as the perception of the “basic tastes” salty, sour, sweet, and bitter.

Methods

Eighty-nine participants were recruited for the prospective study. Group 1 consisted of thoroughly examined patients with olfactory dysfunction (n = 48, mean age = 60.0 years), group 2 consisted of people with normal olfactory function (n = 41, mean age = 50.4 years). First, olfactory and gustatory functions were assessed for all participants with the help of the “Sniffin’Sticks” battery and the “taste strips” test. Second, food odors were rated for their pleasantness, intensity, familiarity and desirability. Last, real food items were tasted orally and the intensity for basic taste qualities (sweet, bitter, salty, and sour) and pleasantness was rated. In addition, salivation was measured following exposure to the food odors.

Results

In comparison to controls, patients rated orthonasal food odors as less pleasant, intense, familiar, and less appetizing. “Taste strip” scores were significantly lower in patients (M = 9.56, SD = 2.76) as compared to controls (M = 10.88, SD = 1.89). In addition, ratings of food liking for chocolate and peanut were lower in patients compared to controls (chocolate: patients—M = 6.85, SD = 2.09, controls—M = 7.90, SD = 1.53; peanut: patients—M = 4.88, SD = 2.20, controls—M = 6.80, SD = 2.33). No significant differences were found regarding the comparison of the salivary flow rate in controls (M = 0.52 g/min, SD = 0.19) and patients (M = 0.50 SD = 0.17).

Conclusions

Changes in the perception of odors may change the perception of food with specific effects on food liking. Olfactory dysfunction affects gustatory function, indicating the central-nervous interaction between taste and smell. Still, olfactory dysfunction did not appear to affect patients’ salivary flow.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hummel T, Nordin S (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 125(2):116–121CrossRef Hummel T, Nordin S (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 125(2):116–121CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K et al (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 118(1):135–144CrossRef Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K et al (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope. 118(1):135–144CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brillat-Savarin JA. La Physiologie du Goût ("Die Physiologie des Geschmacks oder Transcendentalgastronomische Betrachtungen, German 1865; translater Habs R, corrected Muehlgassner J) Edited by Leipzig, Philipp Reclam jun., 1826, p. chapter 8 Brillat-Savarin JA. La Physiologie du Goût ("Die Physiologie des Geschmacks oder Transcendentalgastronomische Betrachtungen, German 1865; translater Habs R, corrected Muehlgassner J) Edited by Leipzig, Philipp Reclam jun., 1826, p. chapter 8
4.
5.
go back to reference Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope 118(1):135–144CrossRef Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS, Hummel T (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope 118(1):135–144CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Croy Ilona, Nordin Steven (2014) Hummel T, Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39:185–194CrossRef Croy Ilona, Nordin Steven (2014) Hummel T, Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39:185–194CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kremer Stefanie, Holthuysen Nancy, Boesveldt Sanne (2014) The influence of olfactory impairment in vital, independently living older persons on their eating behaviour and food liking. Food Qual Prefer 38:30–39CrossRef Kremer Stefanie, Holthuysen Nancy, Boesveldt Sanne (2014) The influence of olfactory impairment in vital, independently living older persons on their eating behaviour and food liking. Food Qual Prefer 38:30–39CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Proserpio C, de Graaf C, Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Boesveldt S (2017) Impact of ambient odors on food intake, saliva production and appetite ratings. Physiol Behav 174:35–41CrossRef Proserpio C, de Graaf C, Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Boesveldt S (2017) Impact of ambient odors on food intake, saliva production and appetite ratings. Physiol Behav 174:35–41CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bender G, Hummel T, Negoias S, Small DM (2009) Separate signals for orthonasal vs retronasal perception of food but not nonfood odors. Behav Neurosci 123(3):481–489CrossRef Bender G, Hummel T, Negoias S, Small DM (2009) Separate signals for orthonasal vs retronasal perception of food but not nonfood odors. Behav Neurosci 123(3):481–489CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G, (1997) ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odour identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 22(1):39–52CrossRef Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G, (1997) ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odour identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 22(1):39–52CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 1211–1241CrossRef Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 1211–1241CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bult JH, de Wijk RA, Hummel T (2007) Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 411(1):6–10CrossRef Bult JH, de Wijk RA, Hummel T (2007) Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 411(1):6–10CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A et al (2009) "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256(2):242–248CrossRef Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A et al (2009) "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256(2):242–248CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ramaekers M, Boesveldt S, Lakemond C, Van Boekel M, Luning P (2014) Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obesity. 38(5):650CrossRef Ramaekers M, Boesveldt S, Lakemond C, Van Boekel M, Luning P (2014) Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obesity. 38(5):650CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35(1):3–20CrossRef Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35(1):3–20CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, et al. (2016) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 56(1):0. Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, et al. (2016) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 56(1):0.
17.
go back to reference Gudziol H, Rahneberg K, Burkert S (2007) Anosmics are more poorly able to taste than normal persons. Laryngo- rhino- otologie. 86(9):640–643CrossRef Gudziol H, Rahneberg K, Burkert S (2007) Anosmics are more poorly able to taste than normal persons. Laryngo- rhino- otologie. 86(9):640–643CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Landis BN, Scheibe M, Weber C et al (2010) Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function. J Neurol 257(8):1303–1308CrossRef Landis BN, Scheibe M, Weber C et al (2010) Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function. J Neurol 257(8):1303–1308CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shepherd GM (2006) Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain. Nature 444(7117):316–321CrossRef Shepherd GM (2006) Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain. Nature 444(7117):316–321CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mazzola L, Royet JP, Catenoix H, Montavont A, Isnard J, Mauguiere F (2017) Gustatory and olfactory responses to stimulation of the human insula. Ann Neurol 82(3):360–370CrossRef Mazzola L, Royet JP, Catenoix H, Montavont A, Isnard J, Mauguiere F (2017) Gustatory and olfactory responses to stimulation of the human insula. Ann Neurol 82(3):360–370CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kershaw JC, Running CA (2018) Conditioning of human salivary flow using a visual cue for sour candy. Arch Oral Biol 92:90–95CrossRef Kershaw JC, Running CA (2018) Conditioning of human salivary flow using a visual cue for sour candy. Arch Oral Biol 92:90–95CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pangborn RM, Witherly SA, Jones F (1979) Parotid and whole-mouth secretion in response to viewing, handling, and sniffing food. Perception 8(3):339–346CrossRef Pangborn RM, Witherly SA, Jones F (1979) Parotid and whole-mouth secretion in response to viewing, handling, and sniffing food. Perception 8(3):339–346CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nederkoorn C, de Wit T, Smulders FTY et al (2001) Experimental comparison of different techniques to measure saliva. Appetite 37:251–252CrossRef Nederkoorn C, de Wit T, Smulders FTY et al (2001) Experimental comparison of different techniques to measure saliva. Appetite 37:251–252CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39(3):185–194CrossRef Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory disorders and quality of life—an updated review. Chem Senses 39(3):185–194CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Manesse C, Ferdenzi C, Sabri M et al (2017) Dysosmia-associated changes in eating behavior. Chemosens Percept 10(4):104–113CrossRef Manesse C, Ferdenzi C, Sabri M et al (2017) Dysosmia-associated changes in eating behavior. Chemosens Percept 10(4):104–113CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stafford LD, Welbeck K (2011) High hunger state increases olfactory sensitivity to neutral but not food odors. Chem Senses. 36:189–198CrossRef Stafford LD, Welbeck K (2011) High hunger state increases olfactory sensitivity to neutral but not food odors. Chem Senses. 36:189–198CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food
Authors
Y. Zang
P. Han
S. Burghardt
A. Knaapila
V. Schriever
T. Hummel
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05558-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2019 Go to the issue