Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2019

Open Access 01-01-2019 | Otology

An international comparison of diagnostic and management strategies for vestibular schwannoma

Authors: Mayke Hentschel, Maroeska Rovers, Laura Markodimitraki, Stefan Steens, Henricus Kunst

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare international diagnostic and management strategies for vestibular schwannoma (VS).

Methods

A web-based questionnaire was sent to 130 otolaryngologists, mainly identified through the European Skull Base Society. It contained questions on general information including guideline usage as well as questions on diagnosis (focussing on selection of patients for MRI) and management of VS, including case scenarios. Descriptive statistics were reported.

Results

Thirty-six otolaryngologists working in 11 different countries completed the questionnaire (response rate: 28%). Guidelines for diagnosis and management of VS are used by 44% and 42% of respondents, respectively. In the diagnostic strategy for VS, different types and combinations of audiovestibular function tests are used when deciding whether a patient should undergo an MRI. Respondents apply 18 different definitions of asymmetrical hearing loss. Variation was also apparent from reported considerations on management of VS. Most respondents (84%) prefer a wait-and-scan strategy in case of a small intrameatal VS (Koos 1). Variety in management strategies increases for patients with a medium to large sized VS (Koos 2, 3 and 4). The details of each management strategy (wait-and-scan, microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy) also differ among respondents.

Conclusions

A large variation in diagnostic and management strategies for VS was identified between respondents. More evidence and/or consensus seem warranted to reduce uncertainties for patients, and differences in outcome and costs that might result from the variety of strategies currently being applied.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fortnum H, O’Neill C, Taylor R et al (2009) The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of suspected acoustic neuroma: a systematic review of clinical and cost effectiveness and natural history. Health Technol Assess 13:1–154 (iii–iv, ix–xi)CrossRef Fortnum H, O’Neill C, Taylor R et al (2009) The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of suspected acoustic neuroma: a systematic review of clinical and cost effectiveness and natural history. Health Technol Assess 13:1–154 (iii–iv, ix–xi)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kleijwegt M, Ho V, Visser O et al (2016) Real incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Estimations from a national registry. Otol Neurotol 37:1411–1417CrossRefPubMed Kleijwegt M, Ho V, Visser O et al (2016) Real incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Estimations from a national registry. Otol Neurotol 37:1411–1417CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zealley IA, Cooper RC, Clifford KM et al (2000) Mri screening for acoustic neuroma: a comparison of fast spin echo and contrast enhanced imaging in 1233 patients. Br J Radiol 73:242–247CrossRefPubMed Zealley IA, Cooper RC, Clifford KM et al (2000) Mri screening for acoustic neuroma: a comparison of fast spin echo and contrast enhanced imaging in 1233 patients. Br J Radiol 73:242–247CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hentschel M, Scholte M, Steens S et al (2017) The diagnostic accuracy of non-imaging screening protocols for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetrical hearing loss and/or unilateral audiovestibular dysfunction: a diagnostic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 42(4):815–823 Hentschel M, Scholte M, Steens S et al (2017) The diagnostic accuracy of non-imaging screening protocols for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetrical hearing loss and/or unilateral audiovestibular dysfunction: a diagnostic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 42(4):815–823
6.
go back to reference Metselaar M, Demirtas G, van Immerzeel T et al (2015) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic approaches for vestibular schwannoma based on hearing threshold differences between ears: added value of auditory brainstem responses. Otol Neurotol 36:1610–1615CrossRefPubMed Metselaar M, Demirtas G, van Immerzeel T et al (2015) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic approaches for vestibular schwannoma based on hearing threshold differences between ears: added value of auditory brainstem responses. Otol Neurotol 36:1610–1615CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koors PD, Thacker LR (2013) Coelho DH Abr in the diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas: a meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol 34::195–204CrossRef Koors PD, Thacker LR (2013) Coelho DH Abr in the diagnosis of vestibular schwannomas: a meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol 34::195–204CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Habermann EB, Wagie AE et al (2015) The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma management in the United States—a shift toward conservatism. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153:440–446CrossRefPubMed Carlson ML, Habermann EB, Wagie AE et al (2015) The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma management in the United States—a shift toward conservatism. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153:440–446CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saeed SR, Suryanarayanan R, Dezso A et al (2006) Vestibular schwannoma management: current practice amongst UK otolaryngologists—time for a national prospective audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:490–495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saeed SR, Suryanarayanan R, Dezso A et al (2006) Vestibular schwannoma management: current practice amongst UK otolaryngologists—time for a national prospective audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:490–495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P (2012) Epidemiology and natural history of vestibular schwannomas. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45::257–268 (vii)CrossRef Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P (2012) Epidemiology and natural history of vestibular schwannomas. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45::257–268 (vii)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kirchmann M, Karnov K, Hansen S et al (2017) Ten-year follow-up on tumor growth and hearing in patients observed with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery 80:49–56PubMed Kirchmann M, Karnov K, Hansen S et al (2017) Ten-year follow-up on tumor growth and hearing in patients observed with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery 80:49–56PubMed
12.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Glasgow AE, Grossardt BR et al (2016) Does where you live influence how your vestibular schwannoma is managed? Examining geographical differences in vestibular schwannoma treatment across the United States. J Neurooncol 129:269–279CrossRefPubMed Carlson ML, Glasgow AE, Grossardt BR et al (2016) Does where you live influence how your vestibular schwannoma is managed? Examining geographical differences in vestibular schwannoma treatment across the United States. J Neurooncol 129:269–279CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pollock BE, Driscoll CL, Foote RL et al (2006) Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 59:77–85CrossRefPubMed Pollock BE, Driscoll CL, Foote RL et al (2006) Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 59:77–85CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An international comparison of diagnostic and management strategies for vestibular schwannoma
Authors
Mayke Hentschel
Maroeska Rovers
Laura Markodimitraki
Stefan Steens
Henricus Kunst
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5199-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2019 Go to the issue