Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Otology

The role of eABR with intracochlear test electrode in decision making between cochlear and brainstem implants: preliminary results

Authors: Betul Cicek Cinar, Mehmet Yarali, Gamze Atay, Munir Demir Bajin, Gonca Sennaroglu, Levent Sennaroglu

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of the study was to discuss the findings of intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) test results with a recently designed intracochlear test electrode (ITE) in terms of their relation to decisions of cochlear or auditory brainstem implantation. This clinical study was conducted in Hacettepe University, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Audiology. Subjects were selected from inner ear malformation (IEM) database. Eleven subjects with profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in the current study with age range from 1 year 3 months to 4 years 3 months for children with prelingual hearing loss. There was only one 42-year-old post-lingual subject. eABR was recorded with an ITE and intraoperatively with an original cochlear implant (CI) electrode in 11 cases with different IEMs. Findings of eABR with ITE and their relation to the decision for CI or auditory brainstem implant (ABI) are discussed. Positive eABR test results were found to be dependent on close to normal cochlear structures and auditory nerve. The probability of positive result decreases with increasing degree of malformation severity. The prediction value of eABR via ITE on decision for hearing restoration was found to be questionable in this study. The results of eABR with ITE have predictive value on what we will get with the actual CI electrode. ITE appears to stimulate the cochlea like an actual CI. If the eABR is positive, the results are reliable. However, if eABR is negative, the results should be evaluated with preoperative audiological testing and MRI findings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Papsin B (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope 115:1–26CrossRefPubMed Papsin B (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope 115:1–26CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Colletti L, Colletti G, Mandala M, Colletti V (2014) The therapeutic dilemma of cochlear nerve deficiency: cochlear or brainstem implantation? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(2):308–314CrossRefPubMed Colletti L, Colletti G, Mandala M, Colletti V (2014) The therapeutic dilemma of cochlear nerve deficiency: cochlear or brainstem implantation? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(2):308–314CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sennaroglu L, Colleti V, Manrique M, Laszig R, Offeciers E, Saeed S et al (2011) Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement. Otol Neurotol 32:187–191CrossRefPubMed Sennaroglu L, Colleti V, Manrique M, Laszig R, Offeciers E, Saeed S et al (2011) Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement. Otol Neurotol 32:187–191CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yücel E, Aslan F, Özkan HB, Sennarolu L (2015) Recent rehabilitation experience with pediatric ABI users. J Int Adv Otol 11(2):110–113CrossRefPubMed Yücel E, Aslan F, Özkan HB, Sennarolu L (2015) Recent rehabilitation experience with pediatric ABI users. J Int Adv Otol 11(2):110–113CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bradley J, Bell M, Beale T, Graham JM (2008) Variable long term outcomes from cochlear implantation in children with hypoplastic auditory nerves. Cochlear Implants Int 9(1):34–60CrossRefPubMed Bradley J, Bell M, Beale T, Graham JM (2008) Variable long term outcomes from cochlear implantation in children with hypoplastic auditory nerves. Cochlear Implants Int 9(1):34–60CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Young N, Kim FM, Ryan ME, Tournis E, Yaras S (2012) Pediatric cochlear implantation of children with eighth nerve deficiency. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:1442–1448CrossRefPubMed Young N, Kim FM, Ryan ME, Tournis E, Yaras S (2012) Pediatric cochlear implantation of children with eighth nerve deficiency. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:1442–1448CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Valero J, Blaser S, Papsin BC, James AL, Gordon KA (2012) Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia. Ear Hear 33:3–18CrossRefPubMed Valero J, Blaser S, Papsin BC, James AL, Gordon KA (2012) Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia. Ear Hear 33:3–18CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Buchman C, Teagle HFB, Roush PA, Park LR, Hatch D, Woodard J, Zdanski C, Adunka OF (2011) Cochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: implications for auditory brainstem implantation. Laryngoscope 121:1979–1988PubMed Buchman C, Teagle HFB, Roush PA, Park LR, Hatch D, Woodard J, Zdanski C, Adunka OF (2011) Cochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: implications for auditory brainstem implantation. Laryngoscope 121:1979–1988PubMed
9.
go back to reference Birman C, Powell HRF, Gibson WPR, Elliot EJ (2016) Cochlear implant outcomes in cochlea nerve aplasia and hypoplasia. Otol Neurotol 37:438–445CrossRefPubMed Birman C, Powell HRF, Gibson WPR, Elliot EJ (2016) Cochlear implant outcomes in cochlea nerve aplasia and hypoplasia. Otol Neurotol 37:438–445CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Song MH, Bae ME, Kim HN, Lee WS, Yang WS, Choi JY (2010) Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal. Laryngoscope 120:1625–1631CrossRefPubMed Song MH, Bae ME, Kim HN, Lee WS, Yang WS, Choi JY (2010) Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal. Laryngoscope 120:1625–1631CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Song MH, Kim SC, Kim J, Chang JW, Lee WS, Choi JY (2011) The cochleovestibular nerve identified during auditory brainstem implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canals: can preoperative evaluation predict cochleovestibular nerve deficiency? Laryngoscope 121:1773–1779CrossRefPubMed Song MH, Kim SC, Kim J, Chang JW, Lee WS, Choi JY (2011) The cochleovestibular nerve identified during auditory brainstem implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canals: can preoperative evaluation predict cochleovestibular nerve deficiency? Laryngoscope 121:1773–1779CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Smith L, Simmons FB (1983) Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 92:19–23CrossRefPubMed Smith L, Simmons FB (1983) Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 92:19–23CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kileny PZ, Zwolan TA (2004) Pre-perioperative, transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in children. Int J Audiol 43:16–21 Kileny PZ, Zwolan TA (2004) Pre-perioperative, transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in children. Int J Audiol 43:16–21
14.
go back to reference Nikolopoulos TP, Mason SM, Gibbin KP, O’Donoghue, Gerard M (2000) The prognostic value of promontory electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 21(3):236–241CrossRefPubMed Nikolopoulos TP, Mason SM, Gibbin KP, O’Donoghue, Gerard M (2000) The prognostic value of promontory electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 21(3):236–241CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sennaroglu L (2010) Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations—a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 11(1):4–41CrossRefPubMed Sennaroglu L (2010) Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations—a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 11(1):4–41CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sennaroglu L, Ozkan HB, Aslan F (2013) Impact of cochleovestibular malformations in treating children with hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol 18(suppl 1):3–31 Sennaroglu L, Ozkan HB, Aslan F (2013) Impact of cochleovestibular malformations in treating children with hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol 18(suppl 1):3–31
17.
go back to reference Joshi VM, Navlekar SK, Kishore GR, Reddy KJ, Kumar ECV (2012) CT and MR imaging of the inner ear and brain in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. RadioGraphics 32:683–698CrossRefPubMed Joshi VM, Navlekar SK, Kishore GR, Reddy KJ, Kumar ECV (2012) CT and MR imaging of the inner ear and brain in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. RadioGraphics 32:683–698CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gibson W, Sanli H (2007) The role of round window electrophysiological techniques in the selection of children for cochlear implants. In: Kim CS, Chang SO, Lim D (eds) Updates in cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. (c. 57, s. 148–151). Karger, Basel Gibson W, Sanli H (2007) The role of round window electrophysiological techniques in the selection of children for cochlear implants. In: Kim CS, Chang SO, Lim D (eds) Updates in cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. (c. 57, s. 148–151). Karger, Basel
19.
go back to reference Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA (2008) Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects. Hear Res 244:15–24CrossRefPubMed Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA (2008) Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects. Hear Res 244:15–24CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA (2008) Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects. Hear Res 244:7–14CrossRefPubMed Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA (2008) Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects. Hear Res 244:7–14CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The role of eABR with intracochlear test electrode in decision making between cochlear and brainstem implants: preliminary results
Authors
Betul Cicek Cinar
Mehmet Yarali
Gamze Atay
Munir Demir Bajin
Gonca Sennaroglu
Levent Sennaroglu
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4643-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2017 Go to the issue