Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Otology

Titanium incus interposition ossiculoplasty: audiological outcomes and extrusion rates

Authors: Selcuk Mulazimoglu, Alexander Saxby, Christoph Schlegel, Thomas Linder

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the benefit but also the extrusions, dislocations, and failures of a titanium incus prosthesis along with the long-term audiological outcomes. We prospectively collected data from 139 patients undergoing ossiculoplasty using the Fisch titanium incus prosthesis between 2001 and 2016. Overall, 126 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up (mean 4.5 years, range 6–155 months) were analyzed. Patients were grouped as “extrusion” (n = 9, 7%) if the prosthesis extruded, “failure” (n = 22, 18%) if a reoperation was needed concerning the prosthesis, and “stable” (n = 95, 75%) if the prosthesis remained functional in the middle ear. Mean postoperative air bone gaps (ABG) for 0.5–3 kHz for the overall group and the stable group were 19.8 (±11.9) and 15.3 (±7.5), respectively. Long-term results of stable group revealed an ABG (0.5–3 kHz) below 10 dB in 25% and below 20 dB in 81% of the patients. Atelectasis was the most frequent cause of extrusion, which occurred after a mean time of 28.7 months (range 15–48 months). Mean timing for reoperation was 30.7 months (range 5–131 months) in the failure group. There was no significant difference in mean postoperative ABG among patients with or without cholesteatoma, primary or staged ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma, presence or absence of malleus head at the time of ossiculoplasty, open or closed cavity surgeries, or the degree of pneumatization of the temporal bone. The Fisch titanium incus prosthesis is a reliable alternative to using autologous incus for interposition ossiculoplasty, with similar hearing outcomes. Using this prosthesis, a 15 dB ABG should be expected.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP (2005) Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 26(5):853–858CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Bernat RA, Poznanovic SP (2005) Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 26(5):853–858CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Siddiq M, East D (2004) Long-term hearing results of incus transposition. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29(2):115–118CrossRefPubMed Siddiq M, East D (2004) Long-term hearing results of incus transposition. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29(2):115–118CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference House JW, Teufert KB (2001) Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):135–141CrossRefPubMed House JW, Teufert KB (2001) Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):135–141CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vrabec JT, Stierman K, Grady JJ (2002) Hydroxyapatite prosthesis extrusion. Otol Neurotol 23(5):653–656CrossRefPubMed Vrabec JT, Stierman K, Grady JJ (2002) Hydroxyapatite prosthesis extrusion. Otol Neurotol 23(5):653–656CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fisch U, May JS, Linder T (2008) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, vol 2. Thieme, Stuttgart Fisch U, May JS, Linder T (2008) Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, vol 2. Thieme, Stuttgart
6.
go back to reference Jang C (2002) Changes in external ear resonance after mastoidectomy: open cavity mastoid versus obliterated mastoid cavity. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27(6):509–511CrossRefPubMed Jang C (2002) Changes in external ear resonance after mastoidectomy: open cavity mastoid versus obliterated mastoid cavity. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27(6):509–511CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cheng JT, Hamade M, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ, Harrington E, Furlong C (2013) Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 133(2):918–937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheng JT, Hamade M, Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ, Harrington E, Furlong C (2013) Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 133(2):918–937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Bance M, Rosowski JJ, Adamson RBA (2016) Middle ear mechanics in hearing reconsruction. In: Dornhoffer JL, Gluth MB (eds) The chronic ear. Thieme, New York, pp 62–79 Bance M, Rosowski JJ, Adamson RBA (2016) Middle ear mechanics in hearing reconsruction. In: Dornhoffer JL, Gluth MB (eds) The chronic ear. Thieme, New York, pp 62–79
9.
go back to reference Morris DP, Bance M, van Wijhe RG, Kiefte M, Smith R (2004) Optimum tension for partial ossicular replacement prosthesis reconstruction in the human middle ear. Laryngoscope 114(2):305–308CrossRefPubMed Morris DP, Bance M, van Wijhe RG, Kiefte M, Smith R (2004) Optimum tension for partial ossicular replacement prosthesis reconstruction in the human middle ear. Laryngoscope 114(2):305–308CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yamada H, Goode RL (2010) A self-adjusting ossicular prosthesis containing polyurethane sponge. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1404–1408PubMed Yamada H, Goode RL (2010) A self-adjusting ossicular prosthesis containing polyurethane sponge. Otol Neurotol 31(9):1404–1408PubMed
11.
go back to reference Vlaming M, Feenstra L (1986) Studies on the mechanics of the reconstructed human middle ear. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 11(6):411–422CrossRefPubMed Vlaming M, Feenstra L (1986) Studies on the mechanics of the reconstructed human middle ear. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 11(6):411–422CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kelly D, Prendergast PJ, Blayney A (2003) The effect of prosthesis design on vibration of the reconstructed ossicular chain: a comparative finite element analysis of four prostheses. Otol Neurotol 24(1):11–19CrossRefPubMed Kelly D, Prendergast PJ, Blayney A (2003) The effect of prosthesis design on vibration of the reconstructed ossicular chain: a comparative finite element analysis of four prostheses. Otol Neurotol 24(1):11–19CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wever EG, Lawrence M (2015) Physiological acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton Wever EG, Lawrence M (2015) Physiological acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
14.
go back to reference Meulemans J, Wuyts FL, Forton GE (2013) Middle ear reconstruction using the titanium Kurz Variac partial ossicular replacement prosthesis: functional results. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(10):1017–1025CrossRefPubMed Meulemans J, Wuyts FL, Forton GE (2013) Middle ear reconstruction using the titanium Kurz Variac partial ossicular replacement prosthesis: functional results. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(10):1017–1025CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Quesnel S, Teissier N, Viala P, Couloigner V, Van Den Abbeele T (2010) Long term results of ossiculoplasties with partial and total titanium Vario Kurz prostheses in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(11):1226–1229CrossRefPubMed Quesnel S, Teissier N, Viala P, Couloigner V, Van Den Abbeele T (2010) Long term results of ossiculoplasties with partial and total titanium Vario Kurz prostheses in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(11):1226–1229CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Iñiguez-Cuadra R, Alobid I, Borés-Domenech A, Menéndez-Colino L-M, Caballero-Borrego M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M (2010) Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 31(3):409–414CrossRefPubMed Iñiguez-Cuadra R, Alobid I, Borés-Domenech A, Menéndez-Colino L-M, Caballero-Borrego M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M (2010) Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 31(3):409–414CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schmerber S, Troussier J, Dumas G, Lavieille J-P, D-q Nguyen (2006) Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck 263(4):347–354 Schmerber S, Troussier J, Dumas G, Lavieille J-P, D-q Nguyen (2006) Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck 263(4):347–354
18.
go back to reference Pringle MB, Sunkaraneni VS, Tann N (2014) Is cartilage interposition required for ossiculoplasty with titanium prostheses? Otol Neurotol 35(3):482–488CrossRefPubMed Pringle MB, Sunkaraneni VS, Tann N (2014) Is cartilage interposition required for ossiculoplasty with titanium prostheses? Otol Neurotol 35(3):482–488CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Coffey CS, Lee FS, Lambert PR (2008) Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 118(9):1650–1658CrossRefPubMed Coffey CS, Lee FS, Lambert PR (2008) Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 118(9):1650–1658CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hess-Erga J, Møller P, Vassbotn FS (2013) Long-term hearing result using Kurz titanium ossicular implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(6):1817–1821CrossRefPubMed Hess-Erga J, Møller P, Vassbotn FS (2013) Long-term hearing result using Kurz titanium ossicular implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(6):1817–1821CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dalchow C, Grün D, Stupp H (2001) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with titanium implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(6):628–630CrossRefPubMed Dalchow C, Grün D, Stupp H (2001) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with titanium implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(6):628–630CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Somers T, Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Salembier L, van Dinther J, Andrzej Z, Offeciers E (2012) Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(4):1095–1101CrossRefPubMed Somers T, Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Salembier L, van Dinther J, Andrzej Z, Offeciers E (2012) Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(4):1095–1101CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C (2009) Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Otol Neurotol 30(3):332–338CrossRefPubMed Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C (2009) Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Otol Neurotol 30(3):332–338CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Titanium incus interposition ossiculoplasty: audiological outcomes and extrusion rates
Authors
Selcuk Mulazimoglu
Alexander Saxby
Christoph Schlegel
Thomas Linder
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4634-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2017 Go to the issue