Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Rhinology

Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome

Authors: Kazuhiro Nomura, Kazuya Arakawa, Mitsuru Sugawara, Hiroshi Hidaka, Jun Suzuki, Yukio Katori

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a widely accepted treatment option for epiphora and dacryocystitis. To elucidate the cause of treatment failure after surgery, we analyzed patients’ characteristics and perioperative background in association with poor outcome. We analyzed 165 patients with 213 sides who had endoscopic DCR. The influence of age, duration of symptoms, occlusion site and stent insertion were analyzed. Symptoms were completely cured in 85.0% (181/213) sides. Higher age (≥65 years) and proximal obstruction were associated with a poor prognosis while stent insertion and duration of symptoms were not. Higher age and proximal obstruction site were associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with a long history can be treated as per normal. The stent is not necessarily inserted in cases where the obstruction occurs distal to the lacrimal sac.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDonogh M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103:585–587CrossRefPubMed McDonogh M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103:585–587CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Leong SC, MacEwen CJ, White PS (2010) A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24:81–90CrossRefPubMed Leong SC, MacEwen CJ, White PS (2010) A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24:81–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lieberman SM, Casiano RR (2014) Is an endoscopic approach superior to external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal obstruction? Laryngoscope 125:2–4CrossRefPubMed Lieberman SM, Casiano RR (2014) Is an endoscopic approach superior to external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal obstruction? Laryngoscope 125:2–4CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 86:792–794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 86:792–794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Choi JC, Jin H-R, Moon YE et al (2009) The Surgical Outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2:141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi JC, Jin H-R, Moon YE et al (2009) The Surgical Outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2:141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M (2000) Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322CrossRefPubMed Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M (2000) Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Okushi T, Yoshikawa M, Otori N et al (2012) Evaluation of symptoms and QOL with calcium alginate versus chitin-coated gauze for middle meatus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:31–37CrossRefPubMed Okushi T, Yoshikawa M, Otori N et al (2012) Evaluation of symptoms and QOL with calcium alginate versus chitin-coated gauze for middle meatus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:31–37CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Murphy J, Wormald PJ (2015) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:219–221CrossRefPubMed Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Murphy J, Wormald PJ (2015) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:219–221CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Thale A, Paulsen F, Rochels R, Tillmann B (1998) Functional anatomy of the human efferent tear ducts: a new theory of tear outflow mechanism. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:674–678CrossRefPubMed Thale A, Paulsen F, Rochels R, Tillmann B (1998) Functional anatomy of the human efferent tear ducts: a new theory of tear outflow mechanism. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:674–678CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN (2001) New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology 108:2329–2336CrossRefPubMed Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN (2001) New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology 108:2329–2336CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Al-Qahtani AS (2012) Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:332–334CrossRefPubMed Al-Qahtani AS (2012) Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:332–334CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M et al (2013) Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 120:2139–2145CrossRefPubMed Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M et al (2013) Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 120:2139–2145CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fayers T, Dolman PJ (2016) Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 123:2255–2259CrossRefPubMed Fayers T, Dolman PJ (2016) Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 123:2255–2259CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sarode D, Bari DA, Cain AC et al (2016) The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.1111/coa.12751 PubMed Sarode D, Bari DA, Cain AC et al (2016) The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.​1111/​coa.​12751 PubMed
17.
go back to reference Longari F, Mobaraki PD, Ricci AL et al (2016) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:2079–2084CrossRefPubMed Longari F, Mobaraki PD, Ricci AL et al (2016) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:2079–2084CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Alobid I, Tomás-Barberán M, Della Rocca DA et al (2007) Dacryocystorhinostomy surgical technique. In: Weber RK (ed) Atlas of lacrimal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 61–68CrossRef Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Alobid I, Tomás-Barberán M, Della Rocca DA et al (2007) Dacryocystorhinostomy surgical technique. In: Weber RK (ed) Atlas of lacrimal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 61–68CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome
Authors
Kazuhiro Nomura
Kazuya Arakawa
Mitsuru Sugawara
Hiroshi Hidaka
Jun Suzuki
Yukio Katori
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4541-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2017 Go to the issue