Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Rhinology

Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D)

Authors: Olcay Cem Bulut, Peter K. Plinkert, Frank Wallner, Ingo Baumann

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate a German version of the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. A prospective study was conducted and a German translated ROE (ROE-D) questionnaire administered to 100 patients preoperatively, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The translation was performed according to internationally accepted guidelines. To validate this instrument, we evaluated its reliability, validity and sensitivity. ROE-D was completed by 54 patients after 6 months and by 69 patients 1 year after functional rhinoplasty. Cronbach’s α indicated good internal consistency. Reliability was tested with a split-half-reliability, showing significant correlation. Discrimination validity was demonstrated by a comparison with healthy controls. Sensitivity to change showed medium to large effects. ROE-D is a reliable, validated and sensitive German instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in patients after rhinoplasty. The ROE-D focuses mainly on the aesthetic aspects of the rhinoplasty surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Koller M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Lorenz W (2005) Outcome and quality of life in medicine: a conceptual framework to put quality of life research into practice. Urol Oncol 23(3):186–192CrossRefPubMed Koller M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Lorenz W (2005) Outcome and quality of life in medicine: a conceptual framework to put quality of life research into practice. Urol Oncol 23(3):186–192CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hopkins C (2009) Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology. Rhinology 47(1):10–17PubMed Hopkins C (2009) Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology. Rhinology 47(1):10–17PubMed
3.
go back to reference Alsarraf R et al (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3(3):198–201CrossRefPubMed Alsarraf R et al (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3(3):198–201CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bulut C et al (2014) Development and validation of the functional rhinoplasty outcome inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 52(4):315–319PubMed Bulut C et al (2014) Development and validation of the functional rhinoplasty outcome inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 52(4):315–319PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bulut OC et al (2015) Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the functional rhinoplasty outcome inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 53(1):54–58PubMed Bulut OC et al (2015) Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the functional rhinoplasty outcome inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology 53(1):54–58PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Rev ed, Academic Press, New York. xv, p 474 Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Rev ed, Academic Press, New York. xv, p 474
7.
go back to reference Baumann I et al (2007) Quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: validation of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 German adapted version. HNO 55(1):42–47CrossRefPubMed Baumann I et al (2007) Quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: validation of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 German adapted version. HNO 55(1):42–47CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Picavet V et al (2011) Screening tools for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic surgery setting. Laryngoscope 121(12):2535–2541CrossRefPubMed Picavet V et al (2011) Screening tools for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic surgery setting. Laryngoscope 121(12):2535–2541CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML (2002) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(1):41–47CrossRefPubMed Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML (2002) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(1):41–47CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Baumann I et al (2009) Development and validation of the parotidectomy outcome inventory 8 (POI-8). Measurement of quality of life after parotidectomy in benign diseases. HNO 57(9):884–888CrossRefPubMed Baumann I et al (2009) Development and validation of the parotidectomy outcome inventory 8 (POI-8). Measurement of quality of life after parotidectomy in benign diseases. HNO 57(9):884–888CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Skevas T et al (2012) Development and validation of the tonsillectomy outcome inventory 14. HNO 60(9):801–806CrossRefPubMed Skevas T et al (2012) Development and validation of the tonsillectomy outcome inventory 14. HNO 60(9):801–806CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Izu SC et al (2014) Validation of the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. Qual Life Res 23(3):953–958CrossRefPubMed Izu SC et al (2014) Validation of the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. Qual Life Res 23(3):953–958CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hellings PW, Nolst Trenite GJ (2007) Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 117(6):985–989CrossRefPubMed Hellings PW, Nolst Trenite GJ (2007) Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 117(6):985–989CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fatemi MJ et al (2012) Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 36(2):448–452CrossRef Fatemi MJ et al (2012) Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 36(2):448–452CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zojaji R et al (2014) Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 30(5):593–596CrossRefPubMed Zojaji R et al (2014) Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 30(5):593–596CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC (2008) Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(1):251–257CrossRefPubMed Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC (2008) Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(1):251–257CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O (2012) Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 122(2):254–259CrossRefPubMed Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O (2012) Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 122(2):254–259CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cingi C, Songu M, Bal C (2011) Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: body image and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(4):263–267CrossRefPubMed Cingi C, Songu M, Bal C (2011) Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: body image and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(4):263–267CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stewart MG et al (2004) Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed Stewart MG et al (2004) Development and validation of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D)
Authors
Olcay Cem Bulut
Peter K. Plinkert
Frank Wallner
Ingo Baumann
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3920-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2016 Go to the issue