Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Rhinology

Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

Authors: Hayrettin Daşkaya, Haşmet Yazıcı, Sedat Doğan, İlknur Haberal Can

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 ± 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 ± 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 ± 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 ± 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fedok FG, Ferraro RE, Kingsley CP, Fornadley JA (2000) Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:560–566. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.100495 PubMed Fedok FG, Ferraro RE, Kingsley CP, Fornadley JA (2000) Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:560–566. doi:10.​1067/​mhn.​2000.​100495 PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gittelman PD, Jacobs JB, Skorina J (1993) Comparison of functional endoscopic sinus surgery under local and general anesthesia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:289–293PubMed Gittelman PD, Jacobs JB, Skorina J (1993) Comparison of functional endoscopic sinus surgery under local and general anesthesia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:289–293PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dogan R, Erbek S, Gonencer HH, Erbek HS, Isbilen C, Arslan G (2010) Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:960–964. doi:10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a45c4 PubMed Dogan R, Erbek S, Gonencer HH, Erbek HS, Isbilen C, Arslan G (2010) Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:960–964. doi:10.​1097/​EJA.​0b013e32833a45c4​ PubMed
9.
go back to reference Khwaja S, Pahade AV, Luff D, Green MW, Green KM (2007) Nasal fracture reduction: local versus general anaesthesia. Rhinology 45:83–88PubMed Khwaja S, Pahade AV, Luff D, Green MW, Green KM (2007) Nasal fracture reduction: local versus general anaesthesia. Rhinology 45:83–88PubMed
10.
go back to reference Srinivasan V, Arasaratnam RB, Jankelowitz GA (1995) Day-case septal surgery under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia with sedation. J Laryngol Otol 109(7):614–617PubMedCrossRef Srinivasan V, Arasaratnam RB, Jankelowitz GA (1995) Day-case septal surgery under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia with sedation. J Laryngol Otol 109(7):614–617PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?
Authors
Hayrettin Daşkaya
Haşmet Yazıcı
Sedat Doğan
İlknur Haberal Can
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2014 Go to the issue