Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2009

Open Access 01-01-2009 | Rhinology

Treatment of nasal septal perforations with a custom-made prosthesis

Authors: Anna Blind, Antti Hulterström, Diana Berggren

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

We present the fabrication and clinical use of a custom-made nasal septal silicone button that can be inserted transnasally into a perforation of the nasal septum by the physician as an office procedure, or by the patients themselves in their home. Questionnaire and retrospective chart review were used to evaluate the efficacy of this prosthesis as treatment of disturbing symptoms from nasal septal perforation. The study included 41 patients (27 women) with a nasal septal perforation. The follow-up time ranged from 1 to 9 years. Symptoms investigated were nasal obstruction, crusting, feeling of dryness, pain, epistaxis, and whistling from the nose. The degree of experienced symptoms was estimated on a VAS-scale. The questionnaire was answered by 37 of the 41 patients. Fourteen patients were still using their button at the follow-up. Treatment with the prosthesis greatly diminished all the investigated symptoms. Also, use of the silicone button resulted in an improved quality of life. No case of infection was noted in connection with use of the silicone prosthesis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Daudia A, Alkhaddour U, Sithole J, Mortimore S (2006) A prospective objective study of the cosmetic sequelae of nasal septal surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 126:1201–1205PubMedCrossRef Daudia A, Alkhaddour U, Sithole J, Mortimore S (2006) A prospective objective study of the cosmetic sequelae of nasal septal surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 126:1201–1205PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Öberg D, Åkerlund A, Johansson L, Bende M (2003) Prevalence of nasal septal perforation: the Skövde population-based study. Rhinology 41:72–75PubMed Öberg D, Åkerlund A, Johansson L, Bende M (2003) Prevalence of nasal septal perforation: the Skövde population-based study. Rhinology 41:72–75PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kern EB, Facer GW, Mc Donald TJ, Westwood WB (1977) Closure of nasal septal perforations with a silastic button: results in 45 patients. ORL Digest 39:9–17 Kern EB, Facer GW, Mc Donald TJ, Westwood WB (1977) Closure of nasal septal perforations with a silastic button: results in 45 patients. ORL Digest 39:9–17
5.
go back to reference Facer GW, Kern EB (1979) Nonsurgical closure of nasal septal perforations. Arch Otolaryngol 105:6–8PubMed Facer GW, Kern EB (1979) Nonsurgical closure of nasal septal perforations. Arch Otolaryngol 105:6–8PubMed
6.
go back to reference Facer GW, Kern EB (1979) Nasal septal perforations: use of silastic button in 108 patients. Rhinology 17:115–120PubMed Facer GW, Kern EB (1979) Nasal septal perforations: use of silastic button in 108 patients. Rhinology 17:115–120PubMed
7.
go back to reference Meyer R (1951) Neuerungen in der Nasenplastic. Practica Otolaryngol 13:373–376 Meyer R (1951) Neuerungen in der Nasenplastic. Practica Otolaryngol 13:373–376
8.
go back to reference Zaki HS (1980) A new approach in construction of nasal septal obturators. Prosthet Dent 43:654–657CrossRef Zaki HS (1980) A new approach in construction of nasal septal obturators. Prosthet Dent 43:654–657CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Federspil PA, Schneider M (2006) The custom made septal button. Der individuell angepasste Nasenscheidewandobturator. Laryngorhinootologie 85:323–325PubMedCrossRef Federspil PA, Schneider M (2006) The custom made septal button. Der individuell angepasste Nasenscheidewandobturator. Laryngorhinootologie 85:323–325PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Price DL, Sherris DA, Kern EB (2003) Computed tomography for constructing custom nasal septal buttons. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:1236–1239PubMedCrossRef Price DL, Sherris DA, Kern EB (2003) Computed tomography for constructing custom nasal septal buttons. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:1236–1239PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Powell CV, Kelly A-M, Williams A (2001) Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pin score for children. Ann Emerg Med 37:28–31PubMedCrossRef Powell CV, Kelly A-M, Williams A (2001) Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pin score for children. Ann Emerg Med 37:28–31PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Huizing EH, de Groot JAM (2003) Functional reconstructive nasal surgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 188–191 Huizing EH, de Groot JAM (2003) Functional reconstructive nasal surgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 188–191
13.
go back to reference Osma U, Cureoglu S, Akbulut N, Meric F, Topcu I (1999) The results of septal button insertion in the management of nasal septal perforation. J Laryngol Otol 113:823–824PubMedCrossRef Osma U, Cureoglu S, Akbulut N, Meric F, Topcu I (1999) The results of septal button insertion in the management of nasal septal perforation. J Laryngol Otol 113:823–824PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Luff DA, Kam A, Bruce IA, Willat DJ (2002) Nasal septum buttons: symptom scores and satisfaction. J Laryngol Otol 116:1001–1004PubMed Luff DA, Kam A, Bruce IA, Willat DJ (2002) Nasal septum buttons: symptom scores and satisfaction. J Laryngol Otol 116:1001–1004PubMed
Metadata
Title
Treatment of nasal septal perforations with a custom-made prosthesis
Authors
Anna Blind
Antti Hulterström
Diana Berggren
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0690-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2009 Go to the issue