Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Otology

Myringoplasty: surgical outcomes and hearing improvement: is it worth performing to improve hearing?

Authors: M. Karela, Sandeep Berry, A. Watkins, J. J. Phillipps

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to determine the success rate of myringoplasty in adults and children and to examine whether the hearing improvement is a potential indication for surgery. We performed a 6-year prospective audit study in a cohort of patients undergoing myringoplasty at the University Teaching Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Two hundred and eleven patients who underwent myringoplasties were included in the study. All were performed by a postaural approach using autologous temporalis fascia and underlay technique. The total success rate, in terms of graft uptake at 3–6 months, was 91.5% and an overall hearing improvement was achieved in 91.5% of cases. This was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Only weak correlation was found between hearing improvement and age (Pearson’s r = 0.175, P = 0.024), and there was no significant difference in hearing improvement across gender (P = 0.164), size (P = 0.198) or site (P = 0.447) of the perforation. Myringoplasty is an operation that can improve hearing in many cases independently of age, gender and the size and site of the perforation. Patients who undergo myringoplasty should be advised whilst been consented that there is a good chance of hearing improvement.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Zollner F (1955) The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 69(10):637–652PubMedCrossRef Zollner F (1955) The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol 69(10):637–652PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Austin DF, Shea JJ Jr (1961) A new system of tympanoplasty using vein graft. Laryngoscope 71:596–611PubMed Austin DF, Shea JJ Jr (1961) A new system of tympanoplasty using vein graft. Laryngoscope 71:596–611PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hough JV (1970) Tympanoplasty with the interior fascial graft technique and ossicular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 80(9):1385–1413PubMedCrossRef Hough JV (1970) Tympanoplasty with the interior fascial graft technique and ossicular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 80(9):1385–1413PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP (2002) Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27(5):331–334PubMedCrossRef Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP (2002) Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27(5):331–334PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kotecha B, Fowler S, Topham J (1999) Myringoplasty: a prospective audit study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(2):126–129PubMedCrossRef Kotecha B, Fowler S, Topham J (1999) Myringoplasty: a prospective audit study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(2):126–129PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bhat NA, De R (2000) Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty. J Otolaryngol 29(4):229–232PubMed Bhat NA, De R (2000) Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty. J Otolaryngol 29(4):229–232PubMed
8.
go back to reference Black JH, Wormald PJ (1995) Myringoplasty-effects on hearing and contributing factors. S Afr Med J 85(1):41–43PubMed Black JH, Wormald PJ (1995) Myringoplasty-effects on hearing and contributing factors. S Afr Med J 85(1):41–43PubMed
9.
go back to reference Perkins R, Bui HT (1996) Tympanic membrane reconstruction using formaldehyde-formed autogenous temporalis fascia: twenty years’ experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114(3):366–379PubMedCrossRef Perkins R, Bui HT (1996) Tympanic membrane reconstruction using formaldehyde-formed autogenous temporalis fascia: twenty years’ experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114(3):366–379PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Gersdorff SSS (1995) Myringoplasty: long term results in adults and children. Am J Otol 16(4):532PubMed Gersdorff SSS (1995) Myringoplasty: long term results in adults and children. Am J Otol 16(4):532PubMed
12.
go back to reference Blanshard JD, Robson AK, Smith I, Maw AR (1990) A long term view of myringoplasty in children. J Laryngol Otol 104(10):758–762PubMedCrossRef Blanshard JD, Robson AK, Smith I, Maw AR (1990) A long term view of myringoplasty in children. J Laryngol Otol 104(10):758–762PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Umapathy N, Dekker PJ (2003) Myringoplasty: is it worth performing in children? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(10):1053–51055PubMedCrossRef Umapathy N, Dekker PJ (2003) Myringoplasty: is it worth performing in children? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(10):1053–51055PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Myringoplasty: surgical outcomes and hearing improvement: is it worth performing to improve hearing?
Authors
M. Karela
Sandeep Berry
A. Watkins
J. J. Phillipps
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0570-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2008 Go to the issue